This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Model: Seagate Expansion 20TB External Hard Drive HDD - USB 3.0, with Rescue Data Recovery Services (STKP20000400)
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I bought two last time this was on sale and shucked them into my nas. I ran a stress test and secure wiped them followed by a extended smart test, both ran it fine without issues. Temps were good for me, lower than my wd reds
That's literally EVERY thread on SD. Most of the content is just two factions trying to prove the other is wrong. If you don't believe me, head on over to the recent lululemon jogger thread, same thing, different product.
Anyway, that's why using a strong sense of filtration and due diligence helps with these comments. Once in a while you get a good nugget of info/wisdom which makes it worth the effort if you actually need said item.
It is highly likely hamr. Higher noise, higher heat, and higher energy usage.
Smr would have lots of stalls after almost full. But we don't hear... my drives stop working comment.
SMR cant handle random reads and writes like a CMR enterprise rated Sata Drive.
There would be a huge bottleneck and the drives would die quickly.
I cant believe bestbuy and seagate are throwing these drives into externals , i thought SMR died at 8TB ,
This 20TB should be like 150.00
I would rather purchase a 18TB -20TB Refurb from serverpartsdeals who gets their drives directly from seagate vs this SMR drive. Even if it was a few bucks more.
Also anyone buying large capacity drives should be running some sort or parity now
raid 1 , raid 5 raid 6 , etc.
Nobody knows for sure what these drives are because to my knowledge, there are no 20 TB barracudas we can buy. The only way we know they're barracudas are by taking them out of their internal casing which you're not supposed to do.
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
Nobody knows for sure what these drives are because to my knowledge, there are no 20 TB barracudas we can buy. The only way we know they're barracudas are by taking them out of their internal casing which you're not supposed to do.
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
They could be rejected HAMR 28TB SMR drives being repackaged as new in an external hard disk where the consumer cannot see the drive. The firmware is erased , 28TB platter disabled to make it 20TB.
Also pretty sure bestbuy bought a ton of these externals . very cheaply and sold it to the consumer . SMR is ok for external USB or a single drive use but never put them in RAID. Not designed for that use case. It will be awhile before consumers get good CMR 28TB -32TB CMR drives with HAMR mozaic 3+tech
WD is a better sure option to buy external hdds, or buy something other than 20TB external , 22-24TB from seagate if you want exos CMR
1 person's anecdote = proof to rely on in what world? You are making yourself look... foolish to say the least.
If you don't believe there is a SMR drive inside, then buy it. It's your money on the line. If it were me, I'd give up telling people it's a SMR a long time ago. I'd tell them once or twice. That's it. If they believe it, great. If they don't, great too.
They could be rejected HAMR 28TB SMR drives being repackaged as new in an external hard disk where the consumer cannot see the drive. The firmware is erased , 28TB platter disabled to make it 20TB.
Also pretty sure bestbuy bought a ton of these externals . very cheaply and sold it to the consumer . SMR is ok for external USB or a single drive use but never put them in RAID. Not designed for that use case. It will be awhile before consumers get good CMR 28TB -32TB CMR drives with HAMR mozaic 3+tech
WD is a better sure option to buy external hdds, or buy something other than 20TB external , 22-24TB from seagate if you want exos CMR
I'd give up telling people it's a SMR drive inside a long time ago. I'd tell them once or twice. That's it. If they believe it, great. If they don't, great too.
Yes, please post a photo if you can. I'm curious to see this Barrcuda drive you're talking about.
Once some guys wanted me to provide evidence to backup my claims (it was online forum). I did as they asked. Then I realized those people had no authority to demand anything from me. If I didn't do what they wanted, they couldn't do a damn thing about it. I think it's the situation here, too.
You guys don't need to believe him. That's the end of the argument. For me, I won't buy a hard drive even there is a slightest hint about SMR.
1
3
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Curious, would anyone here used an SMR drive for cold storage where you would write to it once a month roughly? I'm conflicted on the SMR vs CMR decision for cold storage. Thanks for any input.
what you need is a reliablewith such reliable reputation brandname. seagate has never had a good reputation since the last worst ratings decades ago.
you wouldnt want their warranty and their "recovery" service. what you need is reliable hardware. you would be lucky to have 30% of your valuable data back if they can recover any. the rest will be gone forever.
the replacement is such a joke too. you will get a used (dying) refurbished to replace your brand new that you paid at retail. this kind of practice should be banned. its not a warranty honor. its more like they are trying yo get rid of their low quality "brand new" products. then if they fail they would replace them with the used bad ones.
paid for a russian virgin bridemaid. if shes not virgin. they would replace a bogo single mother.
Absolutely wrong. The 5 or so Seagate external drives i have got over last 8 or so years, from 500gb to 5tb, all r going strong today! What u talking about? Lol
I have two of these 20tb drives, got one from B&H which has Exos X24 and the one from BestBuy has Barracuda. Did test them multiple times, the results are similar all the time. The Baracuda drive makes more noise, vibrations & heat than the Exos drive. Temperatures easily reach 52'c on both drives, but Barracuda is always 2'C more than Exos. I am using a 80mm fan mounted on top of both these drives which helps to keep them under 40'C. Attaching the screenshots, I am not sure if we can confirm that the Barracuda drive is CMR/SMR, but the Random Write speeds are quite less when compared to the Exos drive.
Facts have been presented you are the nonsense here trolling
The only fact you've proven is that they may contain a Barracuda branded drive. Reviewing everything you've presented, there's still no evidence of them being SMR. The only thing I can figure is you assume that because it's a Barracuda it must be SMR. That is not true. There are plenty of CMR Barracudas.
Quote
from CTRFK8
:
SMR cant handle random reads and writes like a CMR enterprise rated Sata Drive.
SMR shouldn't have any issue with random reads. It's random writes that they struggle with.
Quote
from MAC944Turbo
:
Still no proof on the Barracuda being SMR huh?
Plenty of articles? Nope. You mean expected timeframes and roadmaps which had many delays and is only now beginning to roll out the promised HAMR technology.
This is Seagate's official report on rolling out HAMR to other drives at volume scale. The whole claim that they've been in use since 14TB is on a timeline not anything official. Now as far as this poster's claim of it being old and highly tested technology, this is what the report states:
"Seagate has successfully completed qualification testing for its HAMR based Mozaic drives with several customers within the Mass Capacity markets, including a leading cloud service provider. The Company expects to begin shipping initial HAMR product volume to this cloud customer in the coming weeks"
So they did a pilot run, yet we have this random person touting it as a technology that is fully vetted. Date of report? December 3, 2024.
Again, take this person's comments with a grain of salt. Especially given they feel they need to reply in 5 different comments at a time. HAMR is not fully tested, and again this person has yet to provide any substantial proof that the drive they supposedly had was SMR. Bit of a joker really.
P.S. Here is Seagate's datasheet on what technologies are in which drives. Note how neither the EXOS E nor EXOS X drives are listed as containing HAMR under 24TB. So much for that claim that they've been in use since the x14. https://www.seagate.com/products/cmr-smr-list/
To be fair, he did link to an old Seagate roadmap that depicted HAMR being used in some Mach 2 drives (which themselves are a small subset of the Exos line), as little as 14TB, as early as 2019. He then decided this meant all Exos drives were HAMR, or all Exos X14 and newer models are HAMR, depending on which reply we look at. I'm pretty sure he's using the same faulty logic to determine this drive is SMR, based simply on the fact it's Barracuda branded. Not all Barracuda drives are SMR.
Quote
from Hawk2007
:
Nobody knows for sure what these drives are because to my knowledge, there are no 20 TB barracudas we can buy. The only way we know they're barracudas are by taking them out of their internal casing which you're not supposed to do.
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
I agree with you on almost every point. As someone who has tried to follow the saga, I haven't seen anyone anywhere provide the slightest real evidence these drives are SMR. Everyone seems to be jumping to the conclusion that because they're Barracuda branded they must be SMR. I suspect if they actually were SMR, someone would have demonstrated that they behave as such.
Quote
from BlueVoyager308
:
Once some guys wanted me to provide evidence to backup my claims (it was online forum). I did as they asked. Then I realized those people had no authority to demand anything from me. If I didn't do what they wanted, they couldn't do a damn thing about it. I think it's the situation here, too.
You guys don't need to believe him. That's the end of the argument. For me, I won't buy a hard drive even there is a slightest hint about SMR.
You're right. However, if you're going to loudly and repeatedly make an assertion, you should expect to be asked to back it up with something convincing. As for this particular drive, I still haven't seen any hints that it is SMR.
Quote
from bert90987
:
Curious, would anyone here used an SMR drive for cold storage where you would write to it once a month roughly? I'm conflicted on the SMR vs CMR decision for cold storage. Thanks for any input.
It depends on the situation. If you're doing mostly large sequential writes (like video files), SMR is likely fine. If you're going to regularly overwrite a lot of small files, expect potential slowdowns. For occasional use, that may still be acceptable to you. Despite what some claim, SMR does have its places. The ironic part is drive manufacturers rarely put it in places I think would make logical sense.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I have two of these 20tb drives, got one from B&H which has Exos X24 and the one from BestBuy has Barracuda. Did test them multiple times, the results are similar all the time. The Baracuda drive makes more noise, vibrations & heat than the Exos drive. Temperatures easily reach 52'c on both drives, but Barracuda is always 2'C more than Exos. I am using a 80mm fan mounted on top of both these drives which helps to keep them under 40'C. Attaching the screenshots, I am not sure if we can confirm that the Barracuda drive is CMR/SMR, but the Random Write speeds are quite less when compared to the Exos drive.
THANK YOU for being the first person to provide some real information, even if it's still not conclusive either way. At first, I thought both drives were showing numbers lower than I'd expect, then I realized they're half full. The differences in random writes may not be due to what people expect. Exos drives have different caching algorithms than their lower end lines. They can quickly cache a few seconds (<5) worth of random writes, which produces the impressive results on benchmarks like CrystalDiskInfo (which reports PEAK results). Even drives like the IronWolf Pro will get much lower random write numbers in CDM. From a couple drives I tested, the Exos X22 got roughly ~20MB/s random writes, and ~3.5MB/s for the IronWolf Pro. When testing with something like Iometer (which can provide results over time), the Exos dropped massively after about 5 seconds, while the IronWolf Pro continued at the same rate.
1
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
Top Comments
Anyway, that's why using a strong sense of filtration and due diligence helps with these comments. Once in a while you get a good nugget of info/wisdom which makes it worth the effort if you actually need said item.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
197 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Smr would have lots of stalls after almost full. But we don't hear... my drives stop working comment.
SMR cant handle random reads and writes like a CMR enterprise rated Sata Drive.
There would be a huge bottleneck and the drives would die quickly.
I cant believe bestbuy and seagate are throwing these drives into externals , i thought SMR died at 8TB ,
This 20TB should be like 150.00
I would rather purchase a 18TB -20TB Refurb from serverpartsdeals who gets their drives directly from seagate vs this SMR drive. Even if it was a few bucks more.
Also anyone buying large capacity drives should be running some sort or parity now
raid 1 , raid 5 raid 6 , etc.
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
https://www.techradar.c
Also pretty sure bestbuy bought a ton of these externals . very cheaply and sold it to the consumer . SMR is ok for external USB or a single drive use but never put them in RAID. Not designed for that use case. It will be awhile before consumers get good CMR 28TB -32TB CMR drives with HAMR mozaic 3+tech
WD is a better sure option to buy external hdds, or buy something other than 20TB external , 22-24TB from seagate if you want exos CMR
https://www.seagate.com/innovation/mozaic/
https://www.techradar.com/pro/pot...-heres-why [techradar.com]
Also pretty sure bestbuy bought a ton of these externals . very cheaply and sold it to the consumer . SMR is ok for external USB or a single drive use but never put them in RAID. Not designed for that use case. It will be awhile before consumers get good CMR 28TB -32TB CMR drives with HAMR mozaic 3+tech
WD is a better sure option to buy external hdds, or buy something other than 20TB external , 22-24TB from seagate if you want exos CMR
https://www.seagate.com/innovation/mozaic/
You guys don't need to believe him. That's the end of the argument. For me, I won't buy a hard drive even there is a slightest hint about SMR.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
you wouldnt want their warranty and their "recovery" service. what you need is reliable hardware. you would be lucky to have 30% of your valuable data back if they can recover any. the rest will be gone forever.
the replacement is such a joke too. you will get a used (dying) refurbished to replace your brand new that you paid at retail. this kind of practice should be banned. its not a warranty honor. its more like they are trying yo get rid of their low quality "brand new" products. then if they fail they would replace them with the used bad ones.
paid for a russian virgin bridemaid. if shes not virgin. they would replace a bogo single mother.
Come on man you are lost
This is why best buy dropped the 20TB significantly , they are ripping off people
get the 24TB!
https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoar...s_sh
Here you chumps go
Seagate bringing back barracuda SMR drives
probably using some sort of HAMR tech
not CMR!
How foolish people who go against a Grand Master Slick Dealer
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/seag...merrevie
Plenty of articles? Nope. You mean expected timeframes and roadmaps which had many delays and is only now beginning to roll out the promised HAMR technology.
https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.
This is Seagate's official report on rolling out HAMR to other drives at volume scale. The whole claim that they've been in use since 14TB is on a timeline not anything official. Now as far as this poster's claim of it being old and highly tested technology, this is what the report states:
"Seagate has successfully completed qualification testing for its HAMR based Mozaic drives with several customers within the Mass Capacity markets, including a leading cloud service provider. The Company expects to begin shipping initial HAMR product volume to this cloud customer in the coming weeks"
So they did a pilot run, yet we have this random person touting it as a technology that is fully vetted. Date of report? December 3, 2024.
Again, take this person's comments with a grain of salt. Especially given they feel they need to reply in 5 different comments at a time. HAMR is not fully tested, and again this person has yet to provide any substantial proof that the drive they supposedly had was SMR. Bit of a joker really.
P.S. Here is Seagate's datasheet on what technologies are in which drives. Note how neither the EXOS E nor EXOS X drives are listed as containing HAMR under 24TB. So much for that claim that they've been in use since the x14.
https://www.seagate.com/products/cmr-smr-list/
The price is decent for what you get but they could ever easily be enterprise rejected drives that didn't meet QC. We don't know if these are SMR or CMR... Or at least I can't see who is winning the fight up there
You guys don't need to believe him. That's the end of the argument. For me, I won't buy a hard drive even there is a slightest hint about SMR.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!