Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by cmdauria • Mar 2, 2025
expired Posted by cmdauria • Mar 2, 2025

24TB Seagate Expansion External USB 3.0 Desktop Hard Drive

+ Free Shipping

$280

$330

15% off
Best Buy
179 Comments 51,006 Views
Visit Best Buy
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Best Buy has 24TB Seagate Expansion External USB 3.0 Desktop Hard Drive (STKP24000400) on sale for $279.99. Shipping is free or choose curbside pickup where stock permits.
  • Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Thanks to Community Member cmdauria for sharing this deal.

About this product:
  • 24TB Storage Capacity
  • External Desktop Drive
  • USB 3.0 Interface
  • USB-C (USB 3.0 Gen 1)
  • Rescue Data Recovery Services
  • PC/Mac Compatible

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff

Original Post

Written by cmdauria
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Best Buy has 24TB Seagate Expansion External USB 3.0 Desktop Hard Drive (STKP24000400) on sale for $279.99. Shipping is free or choose curbside pickup where stock permits.
  • Note: Availability for pickup may vary by location.
Thanks to Community Member cmdauria for sharing this deal.

About this product:
  • 24TB Storage Capacity
  • External Desktop Drive
  • USB 3.0 Interface
  • USB-C (USB 3.0 Gen 1)
  • Rescue Data Recovery Services
  • PC/Mac Compatible

Editor's Notes

Written by jimmytx | Staff

Original Post

Written by cmdauria

Community Voting

Deal Score
+45
Good Deal
Visit Best Buy

Price Intelligence

Model: Seagate - Expansion 20TB External USB 3.0 Desktop Hard Drive with Rescue Data Recovery Services - Black

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 5/1/2025, 12:12 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Best Buy$329.99
Leave a Comment
To participate in the comments, please log in.

Top Comments

Nobody will have any information on that. Until 2 weeks ago when people started ordering these exact drives and shucking them to find Barracudas, no one knew there even was a 24tb barracuda yet. It will be a while before we know anything about failure rate.

I ordered 3, returned 2 and shucked 1 to toss in my NAS with an exos from a previous order. It's quite, runs at 7200 RPM, and didn't have any issues after a 2 day long self test. With a Synology DS1522+ set to max performance fan speed it runs ~4c hotter than the exos at an avg temp of 42c when writing, but light read/Idle is down to 33c and the exos is 32c. No noticeable difference in throughput in the array. When it was still in the enclosure it shipped in, I tested and saw ~240mbps write vs the exos @ ~270, and 48c max temp vs 40c for the exos.
I think it's pretty much confirmed [reddit.com] that both the 20TB STKP20000400 and 24TB STKP24000400 Seagate externals are CMR Barracuda drives, as Seagate has updated their data sheet for Barracudas [seagate.com] now supporting 20TB and 24TB capacities.

I've heard of some people getting lucky and finding an Exos drive in the enclosure, but that seems to be for the earlier models manufactured before 2024. In my opinion, what you are most likely to get with both 20TB and 24TB is a Barracuda CMR 7200RPM drive with 512MB cache and a measly/terrible/unacceptable 1-year warranty [seagate.com].

I have the 20TB STKP20000400, and it has been working fine for about 2 months now. However, they are loud and slow when waking up from sleep/spindown; I would dare say they are the loudest externals I've ever owned. However, once they are initiated/started, they are quiet and quite quick. (I'm getting 250-300MB/s transfer speeds; the fastest I've experienced for externals.)

Overall, these are fine for typical backups and light Plex Media Server usage (I've been watching/streaming 4k content just fine for nearly 2 months now with the STKP20000400). However, for shucking and NAS applications, I would not recommend these due to the anemic 1-year warranty and Barracuda drives' terrible reputation.
I got the drive last week. Ordered online, shipped (not in store).
Drive inside: ST24000NM002H-3KS133 (Exos)
Oh, and it comes with only 1 year warranty - which is disappointing and way less than the refurbs I bought from serverpartdeals (though the prices for server part deals now went up)

179 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Joined Nov 2006
Mar 3, 2025
CTRFK8
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Quote from MWink :
Personally, I think it sounds like a bad idea. Most people seem to be getting Barracudas now. Do we even have any reason to believe the drives ship from stores and not distribution warehouses? I have no idea about their payment plan thing but it seems like something that could add even more complications. Of course, I'm still not over the hell they put me through trying to get a refund on an order they screwed up but refused to take back because it came with "non-returnable" bonus item.

Basically these drives are Trash, 150TB workload a year is drive just asking to give you smart errors , especially if the datasheet says it can only handle 100 days out of a year for power on usage.

Quote from MWink :
HAMR drives are brand new to the consumer market. I don't consider them remotely proven yet. I doubt it's going to be any quieter than these Barracudas, as they're almost certainly the exact same underlying hardware.
Seagate says it is proven and reliable. They would not be making Enterprise 30TB CMR Exo drives if it wasnt proven yet. Especially with the MTBF spec clearly posted on the 30TB model and the barracuda does not. This is a clear message they are trying to avoid a class action lawsuit in the future

20-24TB HAMR Barracudas have a work load rating of 150TB a year and can only be left on 100 days out of 365 days. This is not a NAS drive. Loud too because there is no anti vibration sensors. The new HAMR EXOs 30TB will certainly be quieter and can almost guarantee the white label 20-24TB drives from WD are 2-4x better when it comes to reliability especially if they have similar specs to a Red pro with a 550TB workload rating per year.
AI is more right than you right now.



Quote from MWink :
WD White labels aren't a Red Pro or Ultrastar any more than these Barracudas are an Exos. There isn't even a data sheet for the white labels, so you can't state their specs with any certainty.
All the white labels are CMR from 8TB to 24TB and have a workload rating similar to Barracuda pros. 300-550TB . They have a proven track record and benchmarks have been proven these are just as good as a Red/Red Plus and ironwolf series. In fact the WD180EDGZ 18TB shucked from easy store has 512MB cache and is 7200 RPM , equal to a WD Red Plus which has a 550TB workload rating per year. This Barracuda is garbage at 120TB a year workload.

Quote from MWink :
Again, the white labels don't have a data sheet, so you can't reasonably claim they're rated for 550TB/year.
All Western Digital White labels 8TB to 24TB have been proven comparable to their Red or Red plus/pro label drives. This is a known fact since the WD 8TB CMR drive was released in a enclosure. In fact you could buy a 8TB enclosure at best buy and receive a red label 8TB at one point. I also have several Hitachi Ultrastar white labels now and have gotten labeled Ironwolf and ironwolf pros in seagate enclosures.

Quote from MWink :
Over the course of several threads you have repeatedly spread false information. This all started with you insisting that the 20TB Barracudas were SMR, which has now been proven false. Bringing AI into the discussion is even more pointless, as it often gets things wrong.
Over the course of several threads i have proven you wrong to save slickdealers countless headaches who decided not to go with this drive because it is utter trash compared to even a barracuda pro drive . Even a white label WD drive is 2x better at this point. Btw out of the 3 PiB i have managed on 24/7 for 2 years farming crypto i have never had a WD CMR white label drive throw an error. I have however had 1 exo 18TB die after writing to it , probably shipping damage. Two Iron Wolf Pro , slow death with FW errors, 1 SPD 18TB Exo recert threw a minor FW error and was replaced by them within 30 days, Multiple and i mean multiple Barracuda drives died although SMR they were only written to once and then read 24/7 for two years.

Again not a NAS rated drive. Even WD shucked White label is a NAS drive. Barrcuda 24TB with a 120TB workload rating is pitiful even if it is CMR. This drive specs state for the 20-24TB Barracuda CMR that it is only rated for 2400 hours a year , or 100 days on . Practically the Same SPEC as the Barracuda 8TB SMR drives with 80MB/s faster transfer speed. This is why many on multiple threads this has gone on sale , they are returning them.
https://www.seagate.com/www-conte...-en_US.pdf

Again
These drives have inferior parts compared to a WD White Label , Seagate EXOs , Seagate Ironwolf drives.


The only good thing seagate is doing with this drive is giving the population cheaper alternative for TB per dollar. Which will ultimately drop prices. Even best buy is will be selling the 26-28TB enclosure with these Barracudas , Failed Enterprise CMR HAMR drives , with bad platters with a very poor FW.

I would not recommend this Barracuda in a NAS . Great for desktop use but not made to be left on 24/7 365 days a year. You are asking for trouble
Also AI is currently more right than you right now.
Last edited by CTRFK8 March 3, 2025 at 01:27 AM.
1
2
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Joined Nov 2006
Mar 3, 2025
CTRFK8
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
The Seagate Barracuda series, including a 24TB model, is designed primarily for desktop use, meaning it's optimized for intermittent workloads rather than the 24/7 operation required in a NAS. Barracuda drives typically lack features like vibration resistance, RAID optimization, and enhanced durability that are necessary for NAS environments.

For NAS, it's recommended to use dedicated NAS hard drives like Seagate IronWolf or IronWolf Pro, which offer:

Optimized firmware for RAID setups and multi-drive environments.
Higher endurance for continuous operation.
Vibration sensors to reduce drive failure risks in multi-drive arrays.
Error recovery control to prevent excessive timeouts in RAID arrays.
Using a Barracuda in a NAS may lead to higher failure rates, performance issues, and potential data loss over time. If you're setting up a NAS, investing in a NAS-specific drive like Seagate IronWolf, WD Red Plus, or Toshiba N300 is a much safer choice.
2
Mar 3, 2025
516 Posts
Joined Sep 2010
Mar 3, 2025
araif1
Mar 3, 2025
516 Posts
Quote from NervousBelieve8259 :
Are these things reliable?
The version with Exo X24 drives we could reasonably assume would be reliable, but what's shipping now is a new product with a new drive in it so nobody can really answer that yet. In my testing of the version with a BarraCuda drive it appears to be a good product and the performance is better than I expected. For backups, bulk storage and things like that I could recommend it. I wouldn't choose it, even with an Exos drive, for anything that requires it to run 24/7 or for a lot of extremely large transfers to the drive since it gets hot and has no active cooling.
Mar 3, 2025
1,144 Posts
Joined Mar 2017
Mar 3, 2025
11A
Mar 3, 2025
1,144 Posts
Quote from mrmochi :
I got an EXOS 2 weeks ago on the BB deal. Gotta be honest, this was the perfect drive for me.
Dead quiet, external, absolutely massive (so no need for multiple drives), EXOS enterprise reliability, had free $10 BB gift card so brought it down to just under $300.

Only takes 6 watts which 24/7 equates to $22 a year for me. This was the right drive for me.
If they only draw 6W, why don't they make them bus-powered? That's would make them more portable.
2
Mar 3, 2025
18 Posts
Joined Jan 2025
Mar 3, 2025
fmabgagloit
Mar 3, 2025
18 Posts
Quote from TachMN :
So many threads for this external...

I ordered two, lucked out with Exos. Ordered two more, then I learned about the Barracudas.

Here is a link to my post in another thread about the difference between the Exos and the Barracudas: https://slickdeals.net/forums/showpost.php?p=175907806&postcount=156&peid=e4fa5c39-a850-4f45-9c74-e3...

I will not be taking any chances of ordering online. They would have to be in stock in the store and the boxes able to be examined (not locked up) to tell if they are Exos or Barracuda.

What are you looking for on the box that states Exo or Barracuda? I assume the part number of either drive?
Mar 3, 2025
1,377 Posts
Joined Jan 2015
Mar 3, 2025
Deal_Hunter_X
Mar 3, 2025
1,377 Posts
Quote from fmabgagloit :
What are you looking for on the box that states Exo or Barracuda? I assume the part number of either drive?
It's within that link.
Mar 3, 2025
753 Posts
Joined May 2013
Mar 3, 2025
SamirPD
Mar 3, 2025
753 Posts
Interested to hear more about what drive people got walking into a bestbuy--Exos or Barracuda?

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Joined Nov 2006
Mar 3, 2025
CTRFK8
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Quote from SamirPD :
Interested to hear more about what drive people got walking into a bestbuy--Exos or Barracuda?
very rarely an EXos

New stock was replenished and best buy never had these drives available in store

so far reviews show 2.5 out of 5 stars
Mar 3, 2025
207 Posts
Joined Oct 2015
Mar 3, 2025
JamesH1227
Mar 3, 2025
207 Posts
I wonder if I got a bum drive or if Hyper Backup on Synology is just dreadfully slow, but I'm getting about 50MB/s to the drive I ordered. I've had a backup running for over 3 days now and it's barely transferred a bit over 11TB. I had up to 100MB/s during one test, but then after several hours it slowed way down. Another time it was more like 20-25MB/s. Those tests were on exfat, then I reformatted it to ext4 and I've had ~50MB/s since. But even that is slow since I've heard of other people getting 270-280MB/s. I'm trying to decide if I want to do a return/replace (if they let me) before that window closes?
Mar 3, 2025
3,620 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
Mar 3, 2025
ebolaboi
Mar 3, 2025
3,620 Posts
Quote from CTRFK8 :
MTBF is not meaningless lol MTBF (mean time between failures) is a measure of how reliable a hardware product or component is. The barracuda isnt even advertising this on the datasheet is pretty bad. hence the 120TB a year vs 550TB a year WD White labels get which are really WD Red Pros found regularly in WD easy stores and Elements sold at best buy. The 12TB baracuda Pro made years ago have a 300TB work load and can be operated 24/7. This Barracuda is saying the rated work hours is 2400 hours or 100 days per year is pitiful! This is a fact

The only good thing about these drives is that These barracudas will bring the entire TB per dollar market crashing. This is the only good thing about this drive. Other than that I expect these drives to fail quickly. Good for loading up minecraft i guess. 279+ tax one can buy a recert exo and still will last longer because of the specs .

Everyone is already returning these drives and i am not the only person telling facts.

https://www.seagate.com/www-conte...-en_US.pdf

No one is spreading false facts even AI is not picking up the datasheet on this crap drive.

AI Overview
Learn more
A 24TB Seagate Barracuda CMR drive is not ideal for a NAS (Network Attached Storage) as it is primarily designed for desktop PCs and not optimized for the continuous read/write operations typical in a NAS environment; while it might work for basic storage needs with infrequent access, dedicated NAS drives like the Seagate IronWolf series are better suited for heavy usage in a NAS setup.
Key reasons why a Barracuda isn't optimal for NAS:
Not designed for high workload:
Barracuda drives are not built to handle the constant data access and write cycles that a NAS experiences, which can lead to shorter lifespan when used in a NAS.
Lower reliability:
Compared to dedicated NAS drives, Barracudas may have less robust error correction mechanisms, potentially impacting data integrity in a NAS environment.
Vibration resistance:
NAS drives often have features to counteract vibrations within a multi-bay enclosure, which Barracuda drives might lack.
Better options for NAS:
Seagate IronWolf:
Specifically designed for NAS use with features like advanced error recovery and vibration resistance.
WD Red:
Another popular choice for NAS storage, offering similar features to the IronWolf.
Thank you.
1
Mar 3, 2025
3,620 Posts
Joined Dec 2011
Mar 3, 2025
ebolaboi
Mar 3, 2025
3,620 Posts
Quote from mrmochi :
u mad bro?

Sitting here with my 24TB EXOS drive at $270 Smilie
Not at all, dudebro. Lmk when that drive stops working though.👌🏽👍🏽🙏🏽
2
Mar 3, 2025
2,151 Posts
Joined Feb 2014
Mar 3, 2025
elefante72
Mar 3, 2025
2,151 Posts
Quote from ChargerSRT8 :
What is their typical price for a 24tb? Do they ever go on sale?
Last year, right now the prices are through the roof, so maybe in a few months they cool down. Normally toward the end of the summer a lot of the state and federal returns happen so Sept and Oct are good and then around BF. This is the worst time of the year generally.
Mar 3, 2025
2,151 Posts
Joined Feb 2014
Mar 3, 2025
elefante72
Mar 3, 2025
2,151 Posts
Quote from mrmochi :
Linus said his electricity is 11 cents / kW and he lives in Canada.

I live in Bay area CA
Not sure where he lives (or when he said this) but parents are in GTA and their hydro is vastly more expensive than that, over 40c kWh. Now I don't even know in the US were you can get electricity that cheap and remember CAD/USD is like 40-50% less so you are saying they are paying 6-7c kwh? I dont think so. The lowest cost province is QC because they have a plethora of hydro. BC is generally the most expensive.
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Joined Nov 2006
Mar 3, 2025
CTRFK8
Mar 3, 2025
10,114 Posts
Quote from JamesH1227 :
I wonder if I got a bum drive or if Hyper Backup on Synology is just dreadfully slow, but I'm getting about 50MB/s to the drive I ordered. I've had a backup running for over 3 days now and it's barely transferred a bit over 11TB. I had up to 100MB/s during one test, but then after several hours it slowed way down. Another time it was more like 20-25MB/s. Those tests were on exfat, then I reformatted it to ext4 and I've had ~50MB/s since. But even that is slow since I've heard of other people getting 270-280MB/s. I'm trying to decide if I want to do a return/replace (if they let me) before that window closes?
are you running a 1 disk synology?
This barracuda is not considered a NAS drive so sustained data rates will drop off a cliff
also depends on the RAID setup and what files are being moved. A bunch of tiny files like roms for emulation etc could slow it down.
i would return it and shuck a WD when they go on sale home lab community have been using these for years in true nas/ unraid /synology with no complaints. or go with a recert from SPD

i run 3 , 24 bay supermicros filled to the max, 2 disk parity in unraid, True nas core all running 10Gbps lan , and have rebuilt arrays over 50 times with unraid. not once have i had an issue with WD white label drives or a seagate exo x18, x20, x22, x24 they have been powered on for over 3 years. I monitor smart data through scrutiny container and do smart tests monthly.

I am running all 18TB+ currently managing over 1.2 PiB about to build another epyc 48 core using a 36 bay supermicro which will run true nas scale and will be filled with exos, WD white labels.

As long as you own a UPS and properly cool your drives they should last and be ok. However i would not trust barracuda specs even if it is a CMR
Last edited by CTRFK8 March 3, 2025 at 08:30 AM.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Mar 3, 2025
753 Posts
Joined May 2013
Mar 3, 2025
SamirPD
Mar 3, 2025
753 Posts
Quote from JamesH1227 :
I wonder if I got a bum drive or if Hyper Backup on Synology is just dreadfully slow, but I'm getting about 50MB/s to the drive I ordered. I've had a backup running for over 3 days now and it's barely transferred a bit over 11TB. I had up to 100MB/s during one test, but then after several hours it slowed way down. Another time it was more like 20-25MB/s. Those tests were on exfat, then I reformatted it to ext4 and I've had ~50MB/s since. But even that is slow since I've heard of other people getting 270-280MB/s. I'm trying to decide if I want to do a return/replace (if they let me) before that window closes?
Sounds like you have one of the barracuda drives inside--the Exos drives will be far faster due to enterprise technology vs consumer. If you need faster, I'd definitely return it.

Related Searches

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All