Woot! has select packs of
60W Otterbox Premium Pro Fast Charge Dual Port GaN USB-C Wall Chargers (Black) on sale as listed below.
Shipping is free for Amazon Prime Members (must login with your Amazon account and select a shipping address in order for Woot to apply free shipping) or is otherwise $6 per order.
Thanks to Community
Member timbertop for sharing this deal.
Available (use the sorting options on product page to select desired quantity):
- 1-Pack $13.99
- 2-Pack $22.99
Product Details:
- Rugged and built to last
- Rigorously tested for safe and smart charging
- Drop tested and wrapped in a tough exterior
- Travel-ready folding prongs
- Efficient GaN technology
- Intelligent power charges devices at optimal speeds
- Safe charging with USB-Power Delivery (PD) and Programmable Power Supply (PPS)
- Adaptable power profile charges some laptops (20V/3A)
- Compact GaN design only covers a single outlet, second outlet is clear
- Powerful delivery for smartphones, tablets and laptops
- Works with devices from any brand.
No Longer Available: 
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
Anker Prime volume comparison:
* 67W: 4.70 in^3
* 100W: 5.20 in^3
I haven't used the Anker Prime or Otterbox chargers, but my other chargers (older Baseus 2C1A GaN, prob 90% efficient) get really hot. Bleeding edge premium chargers are typically >95% efficient. I assume any modern PPS charger is >95% efficient, and hopefully that keeps heat generation low.
I'm sure there's some optimization between charger shape, efficiency, and surface area for dissipation to minimize heat retention. Still, hard to find PPS charging at such a high wattage in a charger at this price. I bought a couple, even though I'm definitely not short on chargers.
34 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Unfortunately, they'll arrive after I leave :/
Good news is I can give these to the kids to put in their backpacks for their school laptops!
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank timbertop
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Hung0702
Anker Prime volume comparison:
* 67W: 4.70 in^3
* 100W: 5.20 in^3
I haven't used the Anker Prime or Otterbox chargers, but my other chargers (older Baseus 2C1A GaN, prob 90% efficient) get really hot. Bleeding edge premium chargers are typically >95% efficient. I assume any modern PPS charger is >95% efficient, and hopefully that keeps heat generation low.
I'm sure there's some optimization between charger shape, efficiency, and surface area for dissipation to minimize heat retention. Still, hard to find PPS charging at such a high wattage in a charger at this price. I bought a couple, even though I'm definitely not short on chargers.
NEMA 1-15 standard has probably been around for nearly 100 years, no reason for a manufacturer to get the blade length wrong.
Tho woot is now a dumping ground for Amazon. Did you get that one from woot?
Edit: maybe your power strips are the problem if you don't experience it in wall receptacles.
NEMA 1-15 standard has probably been around for nearly 100 years, no reason for a manufacturer to get the blade length wrong.
Tho woot is now a dumping ground for Amazon. Did you get that one from woot?
Edit: maybe your power strips are the problem if you don't experience it in wall receptacles.
I got the 72w model last time, while I haven't opened it yet. I don't see how this is different in the way you claim. They both are GaN so no excessive heat. Both out put the same watt except the 3 port has an ADDITIONAL 12w USB-A. Both grippy exterior and style! I'm not sure what I'm missing here!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Solid charger compared to Anker, and other no name brands. I can't tell much difference compared to Anker 3 port chargers.
Solid charger compared to Anker, and other no name brands. I can't tell much difference compared to Anker 3 port chargers.
Good to know. I read the description last time around and thought the 72w model was the right choice for a couple dollars more! Got 3 for $33. Great deal.
Yes I found the same thing. Mine fall out of plugs on airplanes and trains which is extremely annoying. They also fall out of furniture that has built in power strips (like in hotel rooms). Not just a one off - all of mine that are this model do this. Very odd as I've never seen this before with any other plug.
They seem to stay in regular wall outlets okay if you plug them in directly.
Size weight and stability in a wall outlet matter to me.
72w and 60w: Dock at the seaport on either model and obtain identical 60w USB C-PD PPS charging performance.
The USB A port on the 72w is limited to 12 watts @5 volts with no QC. I want a fully functional Type A port to justify the extra weight and bulk of the 72w.
Others will have different priorities.
The 60w is significantly lighter and more compact. It's ac prongs are heavier gauge than those on the 72w. Port power negotiation is fast but the 72w occasionally requires me to manually re-start my USB Type A desk lamp further reducing the usefulness of the 72w to me.
Both models have survived 5 weeks of high load torture testing.
The 72w weighs 123 g and has lighter gauge ac prongs.
The 60w weighs 106 g and is more compact. It does not flop up and down to the same degree when fully inserted in to a grippy wall outlet introduced by slop in the pivots..
The 30w 'Premium Pro Fast' PPS GaN cube is $8.50. I'd like to test it. Note that it lacks the 21v in PPS found in the 60w and required by some phones for ultra-fast charging. But it does have PPS 3.3v-11v 3A and und up to 16v PPS@2 A. It's C-PD profile is 3v/9v 3A, 12v 2.5A , 15v 2A, 20v 1.5 A covering more applications than found in many other 30w cubes.
If power interruption from port negotiation is an issue then using dedicated 30-45w cubes is the solution. Service life will be longer too thanks to better heat dissipation. The USB Type A adapter can then be precisely matched to the device. Low wattage USB Type A devices are tiny.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment