Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Sep 11, 2025 04:57 PM
expiredphoinix | Staff posted Sep 11, 2025 04:57 PM

$499: Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony Mirrorless Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount at Amazon

$499

$799

37% off
Amazon
8 Comments 3,603 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon [amazon.com] has Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony Mirrorless Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount for $499.
Shipping is free.

Price
$300 lower (38% savings) than the list price of $799
$200 lower (29% savings) than the previous price of $699

Customer reviews
4.6⭐ / 695
200+ bought in past month

amazon.com/dp/B08B34HWKV [amazon.com]

My other deals
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon [amazon.com] has Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD for Sony Mirrorless Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount for $499.
Shipping is free.

Price
$300 lower (38% savings) than the list price of $799
$200 lower (29% savings) than the previous price of $699

Customer reviews
4.6⭐ / 695
200+ bought in past month

amazon.com/dp/B08B34HWKV [amazon.com]

My other deals

Community Voting

Deal Score
+10
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di Iii Rxd Lens for Sony E

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 2/21/2026, 10:25 PM
Sold By Sale Price
NewEgg$649.95
Amazon$799

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

8 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 11, 2025 05:28 PM
716 Posts
Joined Feb 2010
cooidude0Sep 11, 2025 05:28 PM
716 Posts
That's a good deal, I paid about that much for this used off of eBay. Although it doesn't have VC, it's optically great for the weight and price, just annoying the zoom barrel is reversed from every other lens I have.
Sep 11, 2025 05:57 PM
789 Posts
Joined Dec 2007
AmerijapoxicanoSep 11, 2025 05:57 PM
789 Posts
sigma announced a competitor to this lens coming out soon. it'll cost about double this price. Tamron also announced a successor to this one and it'll be 25-200 mm.

I find this tempting because of the price but I'm sure the new "super zooms" by sigma and Tamron themselves will be better lenses than this one. I hear this one isn't super sharp at all the focal lengths, especially the telephoto. but I don't own this.
Sep 11, 2025 06:00 PM
1,202 Posts
Joined Feb 2007
scottzeeSep 11, 2025 06:00 PM
1,202 Posts
The best all-purpose full-frame Sony E-mount lens for the money. Highly recommended!

One note: Tamron just announced a successor that will be 25-200mm, presumably for about $800. Also, Sigma just announced a 20-200mm, but it's slower and likely has worse image quality.

For the money, you can't beat this.
Sep 11, 2025 08:34 PM
9,188 Posts
Joined Jul 2006
NattefrostSep 11, 2025 08:34 PM
9,188 Posts
I have the tamron 28-75mm is it worth getting this one as well?
Sep 11, 2025 09:17 PM
38 Posts
Joined Oct 2009
joduscSep 11, 2025 09:17 PM
38 Posts
Already dead?
Sep 12, 2025 12:38 AM
1,541 Posts
Joined Mar 2012
Chevyguy85Sep 12, 2025 12:38 AM
1,541 Posts
Quote from Nattefrost :
I have the tamron 28-75mm is it worth getting this one as well?
I don't have the 28-75 yet but I'm pretty sure it has better image quality vs the 28-200. The 28-200 is a great budget travel lens, it's what I have with me here in Costa Rica right now. Jack of all trades, master of none. Even as unknowing as I am I can see when I excede the capability of the lens. However my a7iii and 28-200 is still noticably better in most cases vs my S24 Ultra. Lugging around my Tamron 35-150 or even my Tamron 150-500 is impractical when I fly with just a "personal" bag. If you want more reach vs the 28-75 then yes it's worth it. If you don't, then no? For me it's the 1 lens I bring when I'm packing light. There is also Tamron's 50-300 which is apparently the spiritual successor to the 70-300 I have. I might check that one out one day.
Sep 12, 2025 02:35 AM
3,701 Posts
Joined May 2006
dreganSep 12, 2025 02:35 AM
3,701 Posts
Interesting, this looks exactly like the 18-200 which came with my Sony A100, I think the rumor was that lens was manufactured by Tamron as well? It was a great lens. I later purchased their 16-300 also amazing, Sigma 18-250 kinda terrible, very soft, people said you had to send it in with your camera to get it calibrated which never made any sense to me.

But back on topic, if this is made for APSC and full frame, are these mm ratings for full frame and we can expect a crop factor equivalent of roughly 42-300mm for APSC?

Or is it going the other direction whereby the mm specs are for APSC and with full frame one would expect roughly 18-130mm? Judging from the numbers that to me seems the most likely scenario but I can't find anything definitive online.
Last edited by dregan September 13, 2025 at 10:38 AM.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Sep 16, 2025 07:05 AM
1,541 Posts
Joined Mar 2012
Chevyguy85Sep 16, 2025 07:05 AM
1,541 Posts
Quote from dregan :
Interesting, this looks exactly like the 18-200 which came with my Sony A100, I think the rumor was that lens was manufactured by Tamron as well? It was a great lens. I later purchased their 16-300 also amazing, Sigma 18-250 kinda terrible, very soft, people said you had to send it in with your camera to get it calibrated which never made any sense to me.

But back on topic, if this is made for APSC and full frame, are these mm ratings for full frame and we can expect a crop factor equivalent of roughly 42-300mm for APSC?

Or is it going the other direction whereby the mm specs are for APSC and with full frame one would expect roughly 18-130mm? Judging from the numbers that to me seems the most likely scenario but I can't find anything definitive online.
28mm-200mm FF.
Di III is FF for Tamron
Di III-A is APSC for Tamron

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals