Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredEragorn | Staff posted Oct 28, 2025 02:20 AM
expiredEragorn | Staff posted Oct 28, 2025 02:20 AM

EDU Members: Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens Bundle

+ Free S/H

$1,714

$2,198

22% off
B&H Photo Video
13,635 Views
Visit B&H Photo Video
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
B&H Photo Video has for EDU Members (register here): Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens and Basic Bundle for $1714.40. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Eragorn for posting this deal.

Includes:
  • Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens
  • Ruggard Journey 24 DSLR Shoulder Bag (Black)
  • Sony 128GB SF-M Tough Series UHS-II SDXC Memory Card
  • Watson NP-FZ100 V3 Lithium-Ion Battery Pack (7.2V, 2250mAh, 16.2Wh)
  • Watson Mini Duo USB-C Charger for Sony NP-FZ100 Batteries
Features:
  • 33MP Full-Frame Exmor R CMOS BSI Sensor
  • Up to 10 fps Shooting, ISO 100-51200
  • 4K 60p Video in 10-Bit, S-Cinetone
  • 3.68m-Dot EVF with 120 fps Refresh Rate
  • 3" 1.03m-Dot Vari-Angle Touchscreen LCD
  • 759-Pt. Fast Hybrid AF, Real-Time Eye AF
  • Focus Breathing Compensation

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff

Original Post

Written by Eragorn | Staff
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
B&H Photo Video has for EDU Members (register here): Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens and Basic Bundle for $1714.40. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Deal Hunter Eragorn for posting this deal.

Includes:
  • Sony a7 IV Mirrorless Camera with 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Lens
  • Ruggard Journey 24 DSLR Shoulder Bag (Black)
  • Sony 128GB SF-M Tough Series UHS-II SDXC Memory Card
  • Watson NP-FZ100 V3 Lithium-Ion Battery Pack (7.2V, 2250mAh, 16.2Wh)
  • Watson Mini Duo USB-C Charger for Sony NP-FZ100 Batteries
Features:
  • 33MP Full-Frame Exmor R CMOS BSI Sensor
  • Up to 10 fps Shooting, ISO 100-51200
  • 4K 60p Video in 10-Bit, S-Cinetone
  • 3.68m-Dot EVF with 120 fps Refresh Rate
  • 3" 1.03m-Dot Vari-Angle Touchscreen LCD
  • 759-Pt. Fast Hybrid AF, Real-Time Eye AF
  • Focus Breathing Compensation

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff

Original Post

Written by Eragorn | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+49
Good Deal
Visit B&H Photo Video

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

Eragorn
22018 Posts
34392 Reputation
Edit: just verified it but here's the reddit post I saw on r/SonyAlpha about it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SonyAlph...o_be_true/

I think the actual retail price is $2898, not $2198, giving it a 41% discount. Also, the image and the description both are different items. Here's a screenshot of the "Items Included" section
https://i.imgur.com/4thUu4X.png

33 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Oct 31, 2025 11:18 PM
676 Posts
Joined Oct 2019
NavySardine761Oct 31, 2025 11:18 PM
676 Posts
Quote from jimx200 :
Do you have this lens? If so, how about a link to some of your photos? I'm looking for images from actual users as I've been researching this combo. I have seen plenty of beautiful photos from the 28-70 lens btw and this review is solid: http://www.thephoblographer.com/2...e_vignette [thephoblographer.com]
Yes, I have the lens (it came with a Sony A7ii I bought years ago). That lens wasn't good enough for that camera let alone the vastly superior A7iv.

I could take decent photos with any camera and any lens, but this lens isn't doing anyone any favors and to put it on a $2.5K body is an insult to the camera.

I do not have any published photos taken with that lens, as I mentioned, it is a toss away. Even other $200 lenses (say from Tamron) have better image quality. A $400 used Sony A7 (first gen) is going to have more resolving power than that lens does. Thus using it on an A7iv is an insult to that camera.

The review photos there are mediocre at best. And if you notice in the review, they are using it on the original A7 (and in some instances the A7ii). The A7iv is a completely different class of camera, and yes, I actually own all 3 so I'm fully aware.

The lens quality is more important than the camera body quality in terms of outcome of image quality. The lens becomes the limiting factor. So a deal like this, you toss the lens and buy something halfway decent. If you have no intention of paying more, then buy a better lens and get a cheaper body.
Last edited by NavySardine761 October 31, 2025 at 04:20 PM.
Nov 01, 2025 05:57 AM
10,401 Posts
Joined Oct 2011
jimx200Nov 01, 2025 05:57 AM
10,401 Posts
Quote from NavySardine761 :
Yes, I have the lens (it came with a Sony A7ii I bought years ago). That lens wasn't good enough for that camera let alone the vastly superior A7iv.

I could take decent photos with any camera and any lens, but this lens isn't doing anyone any favors and to put it on a $2.5K body is an insult to the camera.

I do not have any published photos taken with that lens, as I mentioned, it is a toss away. Even other $200 lenses (say from Tamron) have better image quality. A $400 used Sony A7 (first gen) is going to have more resolving power than that lens does. Thus using it on an A7iv is an insult to that camera.

The review photos there are mediocre at best. And if you notice in the review, they are using it on the original A7 (and in some instances the A7ii). The A7iv is a completely different class of camera, and yes, I actually own all 3 so I'm fully aware.

The lens quality is more important than the camera body quality in terms of outcome of image quality. The lens becomes the limiting factor. So a deal like this, you toss the lens and buy something halfway decent. If you have no intention of paying more, then buy a better lens and get a cheaper body.
You have 3 cameras in the series, but no image hosting site for any? I've seen and read enough positive reviews from this lens to avoid it. Lots of good looking images with the lens on Flickr and 500px.
Nov 03, 2025 01:40 PM
676 Posts
Joined Oct 2019
NavySardine761Nov 03, 2025 01:40 PM
676 Posts
Quote from jimx200 :
You have 3 cameras in the series, but no image hosting site for any? I've seen and read enough positive reviews from this lens to avoid it. Lots of good looking images with the lens on Flickr and 500px.
Not for that particular lens. I have images with those camera bodies with other lenes attached. I can try to send you an IM if you would like to judge if I'm a competent photographer based on my work.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

Trending Deals