This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Model: Philips 50" Class 144Hz QLED+ 4K UltraHD (2160p) Google + Gaming Smart TV (50PUG7675/F7)
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
That's what it looks like to me. Very disappointing if that's the case.
Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
Last edited by bargainleecher November 30, 2025 at 08:02 PM.
That's what it looks like to me. Very disappointing if that's the case.Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
There's a few comments on a YouTube video that say the 3rd and 4th HDMI ports are HDMI 2.1 and should support 4k at 144 Hz, but take that with a grain of salt.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
AI response per the listed specs at Walmart.com: Good value for the price if you want a big-screen 4K/144 Hz display for casual PC gaming, but not ideal for competitive play due to its modest brightness, low contrast, and likely higher input lag than true gaming monitors.Key points based on the specs you providedros • 55" 4K @ 144 Hz: Rare at this price; great for immersive single-player or controller-based games. • QLED panel: Better color volume than standard LED. • Google TV + HDMI x3: Easy streaming and simple PC hookup. • Wide viewing angles: IPS-like experience (178° spec).Cons • 350 nits brightness & 1600:1 contrast: SDR is fine, but HDR10 performance will feel weak. • No HDMI 2.1 details given: If ports are HDMI 2.0, 4K/144 Hz with PC may require chroma subsampling (lower text clarity). • Typical TV input lag likely > gaming monitors (not specified). • Large size at desktop distances: text clarity and ergonomics may be challenging if you sit close.Bottom lineFor $328, it's a strong value as a budget large-format PC gaming display—great for cinematic gaming, emulators, media, or couch PC setups. If you play competitive shooters, value crisp text for work, or want meaningful HDR, a real gaming monitor will perform better.
any thoughts on this being used as a computer monitor ?
A friend of mine has the previous version of this monitor he got last black Friday and it works decent as a computer monitor. This is a slightly better version so I'm sure this will work as well. But could be better options.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Listed for 400, how are you getting the price you posted
The Phillips 55" is $328 so for $72 more for $400 the Hisense is better if you care about full array local dimming and HDR (1000nits bare minimum )content.
If you only care for SDR and don't play in the dark (or use an led light strip for the back of the TV) then the Philips should be fine but.... But if you have a little extra.
Really the 50" is worth more for it's price if you are on a tight budget ($50 less than the 55" and $122 less than the Hisense)
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank DeejayMesh
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I would get an led strip for the back of the screen. Will help make the black levels look better in the dark.
I mean try it and if it sucks then return it but still a fantastic price for 144hz if used in SDR
Appears to be a rebrand?
Also https://www.sharpconsum
And: https://www.iffalcon.co
https://slickdeals.net/f/18860764-hisense-55-u65qf-series-144hz-4k-miniled-qled-fire-tv-2025-best-buy-amazon-399-99?referrerId=3
If you only care for SDR and don't play in the dark (or use an led light strip for the back of the TV) then the Philips should be fine but.... But if you have a little extra.
Really the 50" is worth more for it's price if you are on a tight budget ($50 less than the 55" and $122 less than the Hisense)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!