This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
This Philips 50 inch QLED looks like a budget 144 hertz gaming TV that could work well for casual PC play, couch gaming, and SDR use. The appeal is the rare 4K and 144 hertz spec at this price, along with Google TV, eARC, and wide viewing angles. The main concerns are the unclear HDMI 2.1 and 4K at 144 hertz support, only 350 nits of brightness, and likely weak HDR and higher input lag than a true gaming monitor. It seems best for a tight budget if you do not need strong HDR or competitive gaming performance.
casual PC gamers who want a big-screen 4K/144Hz setup for SDR play because the comments say it's "fine" as a 144hz SDR gaming monitor and a "fantastic price for 144hz" if you're not relying on strong HDR.
buyers who mainly watch in brighter rooms or don't care about meaningful HDR because the community points out the 350 nits brightness isn't great for HDR, but says it should be fine for SDR and non-dark viewing.
people setting up a couch/entertainment PC or emulators who want streaming plus simple HDMI hookups because commenters note it has Google TV and multiple HDMI ports, making it easy to use as a TV-style gaming display.
renters or desk-setup users who can tolerate using it as a monitor for everyday use because one commenter says a previous version "works decent as a computer monitor," and expects this slightly better version to behave similarly.
people who care about strong HDR performance because the community calls out only 350 nits brightness as "not great, especially for HDR," and suggests alternatives with much higher HDR output if HDR matters.
buyers who want full-array local dimming and high-nit HDR because commenters say a Hisense mini-LED full-array model with ~1000 nits HDR is the better choice if you care about those features.
competitive shooter players who need monitor-like responsiveness and strong HDR because commenters warn the modest brightness/contrast and likely higher input lag than true gaming monitors make it "not ideal for competitive play," with HDR expected to feel weak.
buyers who specifically want reliable 4K at 120/144Hz over HDMI because commenters can't find solid reviews and note Philips specs look incomplete or contradictory (e.g., 4K at 60Hz vs higher refresh at lower resolutions).
The listed specs are unclear: Philips' site appears to cap maximum input at 4K 60Hz, while some comments suggest HDMI 2.1 on ports 3 and 4 may allow 4K at 144Hz. Until confirmed, assume 144Hz may be limited to lower resolutions or require specific ports/settings.
It is rated at 350 nits, which is enough for SDR but weak for HDR. That means HDR highlights and overall punch will be limited compared with brighter mini-LED TVs.
It can work well as a large 4K/144Hz SDR gaming display for casual or couch PC gaming. It is less ideal for competitive play because brightness, contrast, and likely input lag are not monitor-class, and text clarity may suffer if HDMI 2.1 or full 4K/144Hz chroma support is missing.
If you want stronger HDR and full-array local dimming, the extra-cost Hisense mini-LED option is the better pick. If you mainly want a cheap 144Hz 4K TV for SDR use, the Philips is the better value.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
That's what it looks like to me. Very disappointing if that's the case.
Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
Last edited by bargainleecher November 30, 2025 at 08:02 PM.
That's what it looks like to me. Very disappointing if that's the case.Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
There's a few comments on a YouTube video that say the 3rd and 4th HDMI ports are HDMI 2.1 and should support 4k at 144 Hz, but take that with a grain of salt.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
AI response per the listed specs at Walmart.com: Good value for the price if you want a big-screen 4K/144 Hz display for casual PC gaming, but not ideal for competitive play due to its modest brightness, low contrast, and likely higher input lag than true gaming monitors.Key points based on the specs you providedros • 55" 4K @ 144 Hz: Rare at this price; great for immersive single-player or controller-based games. • QLED panel: Better color volume than standard LED. • Google TV + HDMI x3: Easy streaming and simple PC hookup. • Wide viewing angles: IPS-like experience (178° spec).Cons • 350 nits brightness & 1600:1 contrast: SDR is fine, but HDR10 performance will feel weak. • No HDMI 2.1 details given: If ports are HDMI 2.0, 4K/144 Hz with PC may require chroma subsampling (lower text clarity). • Typical TV input lag likely > gaming monitors (not specified). • Large size at desktop distances: text clarity and ergonomics may be challenging if you sit close.Bottom lineFor $328, it's a strong value as a budget large-format PC gaming display—great for cinematic gaming, emulators, media, or couch PC setups. If you play competitive shooters, value crisp text for work, or want meaningful HDR, a real gaming monitor will perform better.
any thoughts on this being used as a computer monitor ?
A friend of mine has the previous version of this monitor he got last black Friday and it works decent as a computer monitor. This is a slightly better version so I'm sure this will work as well. But could be better options.
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Listed for 400, how are you getting the price you posted
The Phillips 55" is $328 so for $72 more for $400 the Hisense is better if you care about full array local dimming and HDR (1000nits bare minimum )content.
If you only care for SDR and don't play in the dark (or use an led light strip for the back of the TV) then the Philips should be fine but.... But if you have a little extra.
Really the 50" is worth more for it's price if you are on a tight budget ($50 less than the 55" and $122 less than the Hisense)
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This Philips 50 inch QLED looks like a budget 144 hertz gaming TV that could work well for casual PC play, couch gaming, and SDR use. The appeal is the rare 4K and 144 hertz spec at this price, along with Google TV, eARC, and wide viewing angles. The main concerns are the unclear HDMI 2.1 and 4K at 144 hertz support, only 350 nits of brightness, and likely weak HDR and higher input lag than a true gaming monitor. It seems best for a tight budget if you do not need strong HDR or competitive gaming performance.
Common Questions (4)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Edit: Well it looks like it supports eARC so maybe HDMI 2.1 supports 4k @ 144?
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I would get an led strip for the back of the screen. Will help make the black levels look better in the dark.
I mean try it and if it sucks then return it but still a fantastic price for 144hz if used in SDR
Appears to be a rebrand?
Also https://www.sharpconsum
And: https://www.iffalcon.co
https://slickdeals.net/f/18860764-hisense-55-u65qf-series-144hz-4k-miniled-qled-fire-tv-2025-best-buy-amazon-399-99?referrerId=3
If you only care for SDR and don't play in the dark (or use an led light strip for the back of the TV) then the Philips should be fine but.... But if you have a little extra.
Really the 50" is worth more for it's price if you are on a tight budget ($50 less than the 55" and $122 less than the Hisense)
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!