Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

How a cell phone picture led to girl's suicide

5,315 707 October 23, 2010 at 02:46 PM in Chat (2)

151 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2006
nope.
> bubble2 18,404 Posts
14,761 Reputation
Sr. QA
wuzzy | Staff
10-25-2010 at 03:39 PM.
10-25-2010 at 03:39 PM.
Popcorn
Reply
Joined Jan 2005
HoMycraz Not horNycraz!
> bubble2 2,659 Posts
436 Reputation
homycraz2
10-25-2010 at 04:48 PM.
10-25-2010 at 04:48 PM.
Quote from SlicKitty :
She's a child.

You two just earned a spot on my ignore list.

This is exactly how this kind of thing happens. Children should be forgiven a certain amount of mistakes.

What kind of grown person uses the word "whore" to describe a 13 year old girl? I guess the answer (for me) is - not the kind of person I want to hear from.
Why was she such a promiscuous cat in the first place? Why the hell are thirteen year olds even sexually active in the first place?

Parents need to use features like on sprint you can view picture mail sent or received online.

Secondly why the hell would a girl include and recognizAble features in a farking sext.

Send a picture of your tits with your face... Guy gets off and sends to everyone you kill yourself.

Send a picture without your face guy still gets off and even if he sends it to everyone, you have deniability. It could be anyones tits.




In conclusion , ladies don't include your face in your naughty pics.

Guys could care less anyways.
Reply
Joined Jul 2004
Magically Delicious
> bubble2 10,796 Posts
659 Reputation
SlicKitty
10-25-2010 at 05:36 PM.
10-25-2010 at 05:36 PM.
Quote from homycraz2 :
Why was she such a promiscuous cat in the first place? Why the hell are thirteen year olds even sexually active in the first place?

Parents need to use features like on sprint you can view picture mail sent or received online.

Secondly why the hell would a girl include and recognizAble features in a farking sext.

Send a picture of your tits with your face... Guy gets off and sends to everyone you kill yourself.

Send a picture without your face guy still gets off and even if he sends it to everyone, you have deniability. It could be anyones tits.




In conclusion , ladies don't include your face in your naughty pics.

Guys could care less anyways.

I don't, so spare me your advice.

This person was a child and she's gone now, so you can probably spare her your advice, as well.

And she didn't have sex with him, in answer to your first questions. She took a picture, which she sent to one person. That doesn't make her promiscuous any more than you leaving the apostrophe out of "anyone's" makes you stupid. It was one mistake. Everyone makes them.
Even you.

From what I know of you, you make the kinds that get you punched at parties.
Reply
Joined Mar 2005
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 2,003 Posts
220 Reputation
wes
10-25-2010 at 08:57 PM.
10-25-2010 at 08:57 PM.
I'm sorry but I don't think I'm reading the same article that most everyone else and the title writer were reading. So this girl is tormented mercilessly, then she emails her boobies, then she's tormented mercilessly, then she offs herself. OH NOES IT'S TEH TECH'S FALUT!!Whee That isn't what led to means, motherf#$@r, and you'd know that if you picked a major that promotes thought.

I know that it isn't PC, or even chivalrous, but what would have solved this right quick is if some figure of authority would have slapped those girls' sh!t when they where out of line. I mean smack then around so much they're sucking their thumb in the corner, right in front of everyone. Prop won't hear anything out of them after one or two times of that.

I what to stop all these attacks on tech. Where do you think 50% of my pr0n collection's coming from - mentally-stable, educated women making rational decisions at the time of developement?! I need a steady supply of foolish choices to keep me thru the night, otherwise I'm just alone with my imagination, and nobody wants to go there!shake head
Reply
Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
> bubble2 25,141 Posts
707 Reputation
Iaaaiws
10-25-2010 at 09:51 PM.
10-25-2010 at 09:51 PM.
This thread just makes me feel old. Hell, 13 year-olds didn't even have boobs when I was young.
Reply
Joined Jan 2005
HoMycraz Not horNycraz!
> bubble2 2,659 Posts
436 Reputation
homycraz2
10-26-2010 at 12:56 AM.
10-26-2010 at 12:56 AM.
Quote from SlicKitty :
I don't, so spare me your advice.

This person was a child and she's gone now, so you can probably spare her your advice, as well.

And she didn't have sex with him, in answer to your first questions. She took a picture, which she sent to one person. That doesn't make her promiscuous any more than you leaving the apostrophe out of "anyone's" makes you stupid. It was one mistake. Everyone makes them.
Even you.

From what I know of you, you make the kinds that get you punched at parties.
Well if she took my advice she wouldnt have hung her self with her favorite scarf now would she have?

My grammar mistake did not lead me to commite suicide using my keyboard.

Lesson learned stupid people do stupid things and America's youth are turning into pussies.

I think almost anyone here above the age of 20 can recall being bullied but never attempted to jump off a bridge.
Reply
Joined Mar 2007
serving up a tall glass..
> bubble2 4,047 Posts
3,480 Reputation
.teri.
10-26-2010 at 03:50 AM.
10-26-2010 at 03:50 AM.
Quote from damsel. :
I think the majority of problems would be stopped if kids got a cell phone without a camera and/or had the data plan disabled.
Iagree

yes kids will be kids and they can find another way, but it would make it harder to do so.


Quote from wuzzy :
Should have kept her "breasts" to herself.
Quote from shuriken :
none of this would've happened had she not camwhored herself. Dontknow
Quote from homycraz2 :
Why was she such a promiscuous cat in the first place?
These responses sound like they were written by kids. oh wait, they were.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2006
nope.
> bubble2 18,404 Posts
14,761 Reputation
Sr. QA
wuzzy | Staff
10-26-2010 at 04:32 AM.
10-26-2010 at 04:32 AM.
Kids will be kids? Come on now, Ms Teri. This situation is a little over the top. How many kids take nudes of themselves, send to a friend and commit suicide when it goes viral?

Since you're referring to me as a kid. No, I've never done it and I don't know anyone who has. The parents can't watch the kids 24/7. They will find a way to get a phone/internet.
Reply
Joined Oct 2004
Professor Fishslapper!
> bubble2 12,104 Posts
277 Reputation
dalokgawd
10-26-2010 at 05:29 AM.
10-26-2010 at 05:29 AM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
This thread just makes me feel old. Hell, 13 year-olds didn't even have boobs when I was young.
Iagree None worth texting pictures of anyways... laugh out loud
Reply
Joined Oct 2004
Professor Fishslapper!
> bubble2 12,104 Posts
277 Reputation
dalokgawd
10-26-2010 at 05:35 AM.
10-26-2010 at 05:35 AM.
Quote from homycraz2 :
Well if she took my advice she wouldnt have hung her self with her favorite scarf now would she have?

My grammar mistake did not lead me to commite suicide using my keyboard.

Lesson learned stupid people do stupid things and America's youth are turning into pussies.

I think almost anyone here above the age of 20 can recall being bullied but never attempted to jump off a bridge.
Halleleujah! Out of all the rambling and name calling this thread has devolved into I have found an actual issue worth noting. It is true that kids these days do seem to be committing suicide at a much higher rate than when I was a kid. Is it because the children nowadays have become less mentally stable and are less able to deal with adversity? Is the self esteem generation so coddled that they don't know how to handle any blows to their ego anymore? Or is it because the taunting nowadays in the age of the internet has gotten so much worse? Has the teasing gotten so much more fierce since I was a kid that children nowadays are left no other option but suicide so often?

I think both ideas are probably true but I lean towards the former being the major culprit. I think kids these days have their self esteem so artificially inflated (everyone gets a trophy) and their egos so sheltered and protected (they can never answer a question WRONG... they are just thinking differently...) that they have really lost the ability to deal with criticism and attacks on either their self esteem or their ego.
Reply
Joined May 2006
Suspected porn star
> bubble2 11,996 Posts
1,332 Reputation
ForeverDecember
10-26-2010 at 05:39 AM.
10-26-2010 at 05:39 AM.
Why didn't the parents do anything about this? They didn't see that their daughter was being tormented? Didn't see the signs of a teen in trouble?

Why didn't her friends say anything? Some friends huh?
Reply
Joined Mar 2007
serving up a tall glass..
> bubble2 4,047 Posts
3,480 Reputation
.teri.
10-26-2010 at 06:29 AM.
10-26-2010 at 06:29 AM.
Quote from wuzzy :
Kids will be kids? Come on now, Ms Teri. This situation is a little over the top. How many kids take nudes of themselves, send to a friend and commit suicide when it goes viral?

Since you're referring to me as a kid. No, I've never done it and I don't know anyone who has. The parents can't watch the kids 24/7. They will find a way to get a phone/internet.
yes, kids will be kids and unfortunately these days being kids isn't the same as it used to be. Too much influence from TV, too few parents limiting what their kids are exposed to. Too many parents giving too many things to their kids that they are too young and inexperienced to handle.

As far as referring to you as a kid, I was going by your responses. In my mind, it's kinda like this:

Principal: Wuzzy, did 'jane' send you a photo of her breasts?
Wuzzy: yes.
Principal: Wuzzy, did you send the pic to your friends?
Wuzzy: yes, but it's not my fault. She shouldn't have done it in the first place. if she hadn't I wouldn't have had it to send, so don't blame me.
Principal: Shuri, did you post 'jane's breasts on the internet?"
Shuri: yes.
Principal: Shuri, why did you do that?
Shuri: Because Wuzzy sent it to me. It's not my fault, she should have never sent the pic to Wuzzy in the first place. It's her fault I posted them on the internet.
Principal: Homy, did you throw things at 'jane' and call her horrible names?
Homy: yes.
Principal: Homy, why did you do that?
Homy: Because she sent a pic to Wuzzy,and he sent it to Shuri, and Shuri posted it on the internet. It's not MY fault I threw things at her and tormented her. It's her fault. She's the one that sent the pic to Wuzzy.

so yes, I think your line of reasoning is on the same level as the middle school kids. To say it's her fault that she was tortured by an entire school for something she sent to one person is her fault is childish. Bad judgement on her part, but no excuse for the behaviour of all the other kids that participated.
Reply
Last edited by .teri. October 26, 2010 at 06:34 AM.
Joined Mar 2007
serving up a tall glass..
> bubble2 4,047 Posts
3,480 Reputation
.teri.
10-26-2010 at 06:32 AM.
10-26-2010 at 06:32 AM.
Quote from ForeverDcember :
Why didn't the parents do anything about this? They didn't see that their daughter was being tormented? Didn't see the signs of a teen in trouble?

Why didn't her friends say anything? Some friends huh?
Iagree

and add that if the school social worker knew things were bad enough to have her sign a 'no harm' contract, then why were none of the kids disciplined, their parents notified of what they were doing and why were the girl's parents not notified?
Reply
Joined Jan 2008
the Drunken Snowman
> bubble2 10,780 Posts
154 Reputation
Phrozt
10-26-2010 at 06:39 AM.
10-26-2010 at 06:39 AM.
Quote from SlicKitty :
From what I know of you, you make the kinds that get you punched at parties.
You seem to make a lot of judgments about people based on what know about them from a few posts on the internet, yet you're quick to tell everyone else how they shouldn't judge.

From what I know about you, you're a hypocrite.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined May 2006
Suspected porn star
> bubble2 11,996 Posts
1,332 Reputation
ForeverDecember
10-26-2010 at 06:40 AM.
10-26-2010 at 06:40 AM.
Quote from .teri. :
Iagree

and add that if the school social worker knew things were bad enough to have her sign a 'no harm' contract, then why were none of the kids disciplined, their parents notified of what they were doing and why were the girl's parents not notified?
Unless the school had reasonable cause to believe that the girl's home life was bad, they should have contacted the parents before bringing her in and having her sign. If they thought there was something wrong at home they should have contacted the proper department and took it from there.
Reply
Page 9 of 11
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.