Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Samsung vs. Apple - Verdict has come down..

18,933 670 August 24, 2012 at 04:17 PM in Chat (2)
http://gizmodo.com/5937762/samsun...g-updating

Samsung got wrecked:

* Jury finds Samsung infringement of Apple utility, design patents for some (though not all) products
* Jury upholds Apple utility, design patents
* Jury upholds Apple trade dress '983
* Jury finds Samsung "diluted" Apple's registered iPhone, iPhone 3 and "Combination iPhone" trade dress on some products, not on others
* No Apple infringement of Samsung utility patents
* Jury found Samsung violated antitrust law by monopolizing markets related to the UMTS standard

Damages owed by Samsung:
* $2.3 billion and counting

(Full disclosure: above info stolen from live.cnet.com/Event/Apple_vs_Samsung_verdict)
Add a Comment
Reply

134 Comments

View Forum Thread

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Mar 2011
L8: Grand Teacher
> bubble2 3,596 Posts
351 Reputation
gunnerusa
08-27-2012 at 12:29 PM.
08-27-2012 at 12:29 PM.
Quote from IPT :
oh and one of the jurors speaks out:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3...peaks-out/
Saw that one too...I bet the juror saying they "skipped" a key question is a quote that will find its way into Samsung's motion to dismiss the jury's verdict. OMG
Reply
Joined Nov 2003
The original gay....
> bubble2 8,038 Posts
649 Reputation
HeyLookItsMe
08-27-2012 at 01:45 PM.
08-27-2012 at 01:45 PM.
Quote from IPT :
stealing this post from OCN member: 2010rig
http://www.overclock.net/t/1298842/cnet-exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/0_50#post_18024896



oh and one of the jurors speaks out:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/



Facepalm
anyone can make keyboards but if you patent the look and feel of your design, then other people have to stay away from it. Apple is not, nor have they claimed to be the first one to use the "pad" /"slate" design. they had a patent that covers the overall esthics of their design and THAT was part of what samsung copied. they tried to make their (samsung) devices look similar to iphones/pad to make them appeal to the same audience

the picture with the years illustrates this point
Reply
Last edited by HeyLookItsMe August 27, 2012 at 01:48 PM.
Joined Sep 2007
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 24,000 Posts
2,237 Reputation
Kolto
08-27-2012 at 01:58 PM.
08-27-2012 at 01:58 PM.
Quote from HeyLookItsMe :
anyone can make keyboards but if you patent the look and feel of your design, then other people have to stay away from it. Apple is not, nor have they claimed to be the first one to use the "pad" /"slate" design. they had a patent that covers the overall esthics of their design and THAT was part of what samsung copied. they tried to make their (samsung) devices look similar to iphones/pad to make them appeal to the same audience

the picture with the years illustrates this point
they didn't win on the ipad result, they won on the UI/bezel of the Iphone
if you read the jury result, they found samsung not infringement on the Ipad design.

If you read my quote on the juror, he stated they believed they copied the UI look and the bezel
Also honestly, the bezel? i mean really a bezel is the infringement?

Which if you look at the F700 i showed you, would've proved this "UI" and bezel was already in use by samsung phones 1 year before the iphone was announced.

Its a ridiculous point, the US Patent office is retarded for granting such a broad patent, and the jurors that have talked so far are just giving samsung ammunition in their appeal.

This "settlement" won't be resolved for another 5 years, its funny how they're arguing about the Samsung Galaxy S and the iphone 3G, they aren't even complaining about current devices. But apple wants to use its ruling on the Galaxy S to stop S3 sales? When the phones don't look alike at all?
Reply
Joined Jun 2004
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 27,804 Posts
541 Reputation
Pig
08-27-2012 at 02:05 PM.
08-27-2012 at 02:05 PM.
Quote from IPT :
they didn't win on the ipad result, they won on the UI/bezel of the Iphone
if you read the jury result, they found samsung not infringement on the Ipad design.

If you read my quote on the juror, he stated they believed they copied the UI look and the bezel
Also honestly, the bezel? i mean really a bezel is the infringement?

Which if you look at the F700 i showed you, would've proved this "UI" and bezel was already in use by samsung phones 1 year before the iphone was announced.

Its a ridiculous point, the US Patent office is retarded for granting such a broad patent, and the jurors that have talked so far are just giving samsung ammunition in their appeal.

This "settlement" won't be resolved for another 5 years, its funny how they're arguing about the Samsung Galaxy S and the iphone 3G, they aren't even complaining about current devices. But apple wants to use its ruling on the Galaxy S to stop S3 sales? When the phones don't look alike at all?
Am pretty sure Samsung has their own share of silly patents in their pockets. If nothing else, Apple beat them in the patent game.

Also, irrespective of who copied who...Apple was the one to popularize and commercialize the Touch Phone and the Touch Tablet......no one else had succeeded before them. Gradually everyone tried to copy/follow/get inspired from their successes with the iphone and the ipad.
Reply
Joined May 2004
Warning free 10 years!
> bubble2 24,862 Posts
1,948 Reputation
Ram|bunc|tious
08-27-2012 at 02:59 PM.
08-27-2012 at 02:59 PM.
I'm just here for the Popcorn
Reply
Joined Jun 2004
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 27,804 Posts
541 Reputation
Pig
08-27-2012 at 03:53 PM.
08-27-2012 at 03:53 PM.
Quote from Ram|bunc|tious :
I'm just here for the Popcorn
Reply
Joined Dec 2005
L9: Master
> bubble2 4,769 Posts
1,002 Reputation
V0RT3X
08-27-2012 at 04:07 PM.
08-27-2012 at 04:07 PM.
You don't see Apple suing this company

Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jun 2007
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 6,427 Posts
772 Reputation
jackbauer24
08-27-2012 at 04:19 PM.
08-27-2012 at 04:19 PM.
Quote from V0RT3X :
You don't see Apple suing this company
maybe that company does not sell that phone in the USA.
Reply
Joined Jul 2006
CDI gave me free netflix!
> bubble2 51,186 Posts
11,206 Reputation
dzap
08-27-2012 at 06:46 PM.
08-27-2012 at 06:46 PM.
Quote from V0RT3X :
You don't see Apple suing this company
If it's made in China and sold in China, then Apple can't do jack. China copies everything. They copy cars, phones, tablets, theme parks (yes they really have a FAKE Disneyland)., fake Apple stores, etc.

China don't give a fark, because China doesn't care. IP doesn't exist there (not for foreign companies anyway).

That and because the legal system is so slow. If Apple tries to sue any one of those guys, they'll have 15-25 new models of the same thing by the time it even reaches the court, so it'll be irrelevant.

Trying to sue someone in China for copyright infringement is like playing a very long game of cat and mouse. You'll never win.
Reply
Joined Jan 2004
L4: Never been better
> bubble2 783 Posts
61 Reputation
iampakky
08-27-2012 at 06:58 PM.
08-27-2012 at 06:58 PM.
There is a difference between Chinese copies and Korean copies. Koreans did not admit they were copying. They made slight modifications or improvements and claimed they were all their ideas. It is their culture. I learned this from working with many Koreans in the past. I hope this does not apply to every Koreans but I saw majority of them were always implementing this strategy to save them time and effort. They have no shame doing this. Samsung is the great example of Korean copycats. Japaneses were among the victims. Koreans hate Japaneses but copying everything from snacks to cars. Hundai copying Honda, Mercedes, BMW and Lexus is another good example. Now Hundai car is looking better the make they were copying from. I am glad that the jury reached the verdict against Samsung.
Reply
Last edited by iampakky August 27, 2012 at 07:00 PM.
Joined Jan 2004
L4: Never been better
> bubble2 783 Posts
61 Reputation
iampakky
08-27-2012 at 07:12 PM.
Reply
Joined Dec 2007
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 8,122 Posts
1,545 Reputation
menace33
08-27-2012 at 08:50 PM.
08-27-2012 at 08:50 PM.
Quote from iampakky :
Koreans hate Japaneses but copying everything from snacks to cars. Hundai copying Honda, Mercedes, BMW and Lexus is another good example. Now Hundai car is looking better the make they were copying from. I am glad that the jury reached the verdict against Samsung.
Which Koreans? Chairbash
Reply
Joined Jun 2011
if its Free its for ME!
> bubble2 2,848 Posts
2,379 Reputation
Bad_Boy
08-27-2012 at 10:00 PM.
08-27-2012 at 10:00 PM.
Smack samsung go sue apple for stealing the name of a fruit, now if u tell someone hey you want apple? they be like yea dad get me macbook pro ok? No b*tch i was talking about the FRUIT!
Reply
Joined Jul 2004
i inspire travel
> bubble2 92,684 Posts
36,041 Reputation
Pro
Deal Hunter
serra | Staff
08-27-2012 at 10:37 PM.
08-27-2012 at 10:37 PM.
Quote from iampakky :
There is a difference between Chinese copies and Korean copies. Koreans did not admit they were copying. They made slight modifications or improvements and claimed they were all their ideas. It is their culture. I learned this from working with many Koreans in the past. I hope this does not apply to every Koreans but I saw majority of them were always implementing this strategy to save them time and effort. They have no shame doing this. Samsung is the great example of Korean copycats. Japaneses were among the victims. Koreans hate Japaneses but copying everything from snacks to cars. Hundai copying Honda, Mercedes, BMW and Lexus is another good example. Now Hundai car is looking better the make they were copying from. I am glad that the jury reached the verdict against Samsung.
there's actually truth to that.

the store "forever 21" was founded by a korean man. he had only one store when he started. his two daughters looked thru fashion magazines & today's fashion trends. they took the designs, modified it, made their own labels and most of all, made it affordable.

true story, read it in an interview somewhere.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jan 2005
My life. My card.
> bubble2 9,507 Posts
3,600 Reputation
myamex
08-27-2012 at 10:44 PM.
08-27-2012 at 10:44 PM.
Quote from iampakky :
There is a difference between Chinese copies and Korean copies. Koreans did not admit they were copying. They made slight modifications or improvements and claimed they were all their ideas. It is their culture. I learned this from working with many Koreans in the past. I hope this does not apply to every Koreans but I saw majority of them were always implementing this strategy to save them time and effort. They have no shame doing this. Samsung is the great example of Korean copycats. Japaneses were among the victims. Koreans hate Japaneses but copying everything from snacks to cars. Hundai copying Honda, Mercedes, BMW and Lexus is another good example. Now Hundai car is looking better the make they were copying from. I am glad that the jury reached the verdict against Samsung.
Koreans are just a joke . They claimed they invented Chinese characters, Chinese herbology and press printing. They even claimed Confucius was a Korean.

Talking about a country where everyone does plastic surgery and scare of fan death. LMAO

I hate to see Apple abusing patent system to take down competition, but I really don't care much about Samsung.
Reply
Page 6 of 9
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.