Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Only read if you are NOT religious and/or do not believe in any 'supreme' being (othe

77,018 212,304 December 2, 2007 at 08:48 PM in Question
personal attacks will not be tolerated and will be mod alerted, if you wish to set someone apart use generalities, such as specific religion not speific person on SD for example

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you dont get the right to feel insulted, u have been warned...

so, peeps, if you dont believe in god, do you feel that ones that do are delusional?

a lot of people will sight karma or other things as 'he got what he had coming' but i argue that it's all a mathematical randomness that on a small scale might seem like karma

perfect example is: when you play poker and u push with the best hand, a LOT of times, you can predict/be so sure that the card will come that will beat you even if the chance of it coming is less than 1:6. when the card comes, some might argue it as karma, but i argue that its all random, just on a small scale randomness doesn't work

discuss....

Community Wiki

Last Edited by Ram|bunc|tious December 6, 2007 at 06:15 AM


wikipost loves you too!

866 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Oct 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 32,527 Posts
1,665 Reputation
arjunsr
12-03-2007 at 04:57 PM.
12-03-2007 at 04:57 PM.
Quote from Drio :
The one with an ouce of evidence.

What is there to "teach" about creationism? Fine, "God said Poof! Class dismissed" The only thing taught... would be how to disprove evolution.

Really... what would you say? Aside from listing off the reasons evolution can't be.

God made this.... then he thought it would be cool with some eyes.... and then he put a little fluffy cloud over here. It didn't go so well on the first night because it kept running into trees while flying in the dark! That's when God decided to give it radar! And that's how we have the bat. Whee

I guess you could ignore the science of how they came to be... and just study how they are today. Maybe a little praise in there because he did such a knockup job?
yep. its a science class. asking people to have faith in a designer isn't science. its a valid opinion, but its not somethign that can be subject to a scientific hypohtesis.
Reply
Joined Jul 2004
Magically Delicious
> bubble2 10,796 Posts
659 Reputation
SlicKitty
12-03-2007 at 05:02 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:02 PM.
Quote from Mavtech :
So, your telling me there is absolutely no chance at all that it was just you and your body fighting real hard to beat the ailment? Why not give yourself any credit? This is one of those situations where someone doesn't know why something happened. So, they attribute it to divine intervention. Also, how many other people in the world were close to death at the time you were? Did you win some sort of lottery to get his help? How many others had his help at that time? If thousands others survived a serious illness at that time, which ones were God's hand and which ones were just hard work and fight? How do we know the difference?

As for the enzyme comment: Again, something cannot be fully explained. So, people just attribute it to God. It's just not good enough for me. I want to know. I'm not just going to take someone's word for it. We don't where science is concerned. Why do people do it with religion?
It wasn't an ailment, it was a ruptured aorta. Your body doesn't fight a ruptured aorta. Trust me, your life is never, ever so out of your own hands as it is in that particular situation. There is literally nothing you can do to save yourself. I am a controlling person and there is nothing that can be done on your own behalf. You are completely at the mercy of others. In addition, I wasn't even supposed to be in Rome, or with the fluent Italian speaker (whose job it is to be the liaison for medical emergencies...whom I met only 2 hours prior to my emergency), or get the #1 vascular surgeon in Europe, but I've told this story before here, and you are looking to refute what I know to be true. You weren't there. I was. I know what saved my life. I'm not "attributing" anything to divine intervention. I know what was. There's no illusion on my part. I'm completely clear, lucid, and informed about who saved me.
The short answer is, "No. My body had nothing at all to do with the miracle of survival, nor the 10 hours of things that needed to fall into perfect position to save my life."

It is interesting to me though how one might think that someone like me (certainly no athlete) would be able to survive an aortal arterial bleed for about 2 hours, when an athlete like Sean Taylor, younger than I, was unable to survive one.

And you're wrong about Scientists just throwing up their hands and stating that the enzyme cannot be explained. Many Scientists have had exactly this one thing lead them to the conclusion that there must be intelligent design, including the Scientist who preaches at my own church. It may not be your choice, but it is the choice of others.

As I said before, there is a choice to be made. If your choice is not to believe, then you've made your choice. There's no need to belittle the choice of those who believe otherwise. Stating that those who do explain the enzyme through intelligent design are no more fools than those who choose not to explain it at all.
Reply
Joined Nov 2005
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 39,439 Posts
5,562 Reputation
Dr. J
12-03-2007 at 05:02 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:02 PM.
I've thought about this before - if the church (any religion for that matter) was created for power (and everything that follows, $$, etc etc) - based on the belief that there is some big bad God out there, and the people crating it KNEW it was false, then why is it the way it is? I mean - the goal of many religions is the betterment of mankind - help your neighbor, don't be greedy, in general live a "good" life for you and everyone else. If religions were created for the purpose of control for the benefit of a select few (e.g. pope, etc) then shouldn't it be the OTHER way around? Survival of the fittest - rape and pillage to get what you want.

In Jesus' case, why would (He) (or the Apostles I guess) create a religion based on just being a GOOD person if their quest was money and power?
Reply
Joined Jul 2004
Magically Delicious
> bubble2 10,796 Posts
659 Reputation
SlicKitty
12-03-2007 at 05:09 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:09 PM.
Quote from Drio :
I'm not even sold on the Big Bang...

I just find evolution plausible enough that I like to argue with people that find it unfathomable. laugh out loud
I don't find evolution unfathomable, or even the idea that there was a species similar to ours. Peking Man was proven to be a hoax, however, Neanderthal Man has not. So far, it appears that Neanderthal Man's fossils are genuine. I don't know why it isn't possible that there was Neanderthal Man independent from Homo Sapien, or that we've progressed from that point, or that Neanderthal Man was never really that far behind where we are to begin with.
Reply
Joined Feb 2007
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,709 Posts
230 Reputation
ThatOneNotThis
12-03-2007 at 05:11 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:11 PM.
Quote from Drio :
The one with an ouce of evidence.

What is there to "teach" about creationism? Fine, "God said Poof! Class dismissed" The only thing taught... would be how to disprove evolution.

Really... what would you say? Aside from listing off the reasons evolution can't be.

God made this.... then he thought it would be cool with some eyes.... and then he put a little fluffy cloud over here. It didn't go so well on the first night because it kept running into trees while flying in the dark! That's when God decided to give it radar! And that's how we have the bat. Whee

I guess you could ignore the science of how they came to be... and just study how they are today. Maybe a little praise in there because he did such a knockup job?
LMAO

Drio, that was funny... I just spent a minute chuckling to myself.

It's my personal opinion that evolution as is - is wrong from the beginning. I'm not saying that EVERYTHING is absolutely incorrect about evolution.

I believe in the fact that things do evolve (change over time)... I don't think that was ever my point to dismiss.. Because I mean you can see it right now, with a naked eye... Creationism doesn't try to disprove that things and characteristics change...

It sheds a different light on how things actually came to be, NOT per se - how things are/were after they came to be.


I realize and even understand that the entire theory of evolution isn't just about "how it began"... It also continues on to say how species change, and adapt of conditions and life on this planet.

I don't think that the theory that Creationism proposes argues w/ the aspects of life AFTER it was created... And that's kinda why its called CREATIONism...
Reply
Joined Dec 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 26,586 Posts
3,338 Reputation
Mavtech
12-03-2007 at 05:22 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:22 PM.
Quote from SlicKitty :
It wasn't an ailment, it was a ruptured aorta. Your body doesn't fight a ruptured aorta. Trust me, your life is never, ever so out of your own hands as it is in that particular situation. There is literally nothing you can do to save yourself. I am a controlling person and there is nothing that can be done on your own behalf. You are completely at the mercy of others. In addition, I wasn't even supposed to be in Rome, or with the fluent Italian speaker (whose job it is to be the liaison for medical emergencies...whom I met only 2 hours prior to my emergency), or get the #1 vascular surgeon in Europe, but I've told this story before here, and you are looking to refute what I know to be true. You weren't there. I was. I know what saved my life. I'm not "attributing" anything to divine intervention. I know what was. There's no illusion on my part. I'm completely clear, lucid, and informed about who saved me.
The short answer is, "No. My body had nothing at all to do with the miracle of survival, nor the 10 hours of things that needed to fall into perfect position to save my life."

It is interesting to me though how one might think that someone like me (certainly no athlete) would be able to survive an aortal arterial bleed for about 2 hours, when an athlete like Sean Taylor, younger than I, was unable to survive one.

And you're wrong about Scientists just throwing up their hands and stating that the enzyme cannot be explained. Many Scientists have had exactly this one thing lead them to the conclusion that there must be intelligent design, including the Scientist who preaches at my own church. It may not be your choice, but it is the choice of others.

As I said before, there is a choice to be made. If your choice is not to believe, then you've made your choice. There's no need to belittle the choice of those who believe otherwise. Stating that those who do explain the enzyme through intelligent design are no more fools than those who choose not to explain it at all.
I didn't belittle anything or anyone. I simply asked you questions. I think people in situations like that often short suit themselves on credit when something awesome happens. Do I think it's spectacular and awesome that survived? Absolutely! Could I ever say it was God who saved you (or me if I were ever in a similar situation)? Not unless I saw him or spoke to him. You didn't say you saw him or spoke to him. You just said it was God's hand because of how close you were to death and survived. Just because events fell into place doesn't mean God did it. There's a whole bunch of chance and luck to figure in as well. You said yourself that you had the best doctor in Europe. So, I say he had more to do with it than anyone else. Give him the credit. He's a physical, tangible person who everyone knows exists and had the most direct contact with you. I'm not telling you how you should feel. Just stating my opinion. Also, I am not a "non-believer". I'm just not a full believer either. Like I said before, I'm a fence-sitter. Smilie

I believe what I see, hear, smell, and touch until I have reason to believe otherwise.
Reply
Joined Feb 2007
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,709 Posts
230 Reputation
ThatOneNotThis
12-03-2007 at 05:24 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:24 PM.
Quote from arjunsr :
yep. its a science class. asking people to have faith in a designer isn't science. its a valid opinion, but its not somethign that can be subject to a scientific hypohtesis.
Why do people call "faith" as something that you have to try and make yourself believe in when there is hard evidence to back it up... And I've listed evidence above to put the evolution theory that it took millions/billions of years for living things to "evolve" out of pudding... The Carbon dating on that diamond proves that it is less than 58,000 years old; not nearly enough time for evolution to be correct on the origin of species...

But if science even gives evidence to the fact that we were actually "intelligently designed" - why would that be faith?

Let me ask this question arj. Why do you have to have "faith" in gravity? You can't see it, or touch it. Yet you know its there - because there is evidence (scientific) to prove it. Therefore, its not your faith in gravity - but rather your belief that brings it home to you...

I personally believe that if you look, you will find - and then you can believe w/ more than just faith... The trick to it is you have to look beyond just what you want to see, and look from a point of view that God DOES exist; and you will find evidence to back it up. If you look from the point of view that God does NOT exist, then you will only see what you want yourself to see.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
12-03-2007 at 05:28 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:28 PM.
Quote from CovertCelery :
The trick to it is you have to look beyond just what you want to see, and look from a point of view that God DOES exist; and you will find evidence to back it up. If you look from the point of view that God does NOT exist, then you will only see what you want yourself to see.
That works both ways. If you want him to exist you can find evidence that he does, if you don't want him to exist then you can find evidence that he wont exist.
Reply
Joined May 2007
♥ Love my puppies!
> bubble2 6,815 Posts
818 Reputation
BrgnHntr
12-03-2007 at 05:29 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:29 PM.
Quote from Dr. J :
I've thought about this before - if the church (any religion for that matter) was created for power (and everything that follows, $$, etc etc) - based on the belief that there is some big bad God out there, and the people crating it KNEW it was false, then why is it the way it is? I mean - the goal of many religions is the betterment of mankind - help your neighbor, don't be greedy, in general live a "good" life for you and everyone else. If religions were created for the purpose of control for the benefit of a select few (e.g. pope, etc) then shouldn't it be the OTHER way around? Survival of the fittest - rape and pillage to get what you want.

In Jesus' case, why would (He) (or the Apostles I guess) create a religion based on just being a GOOD person if their quest was money and power?
Good point. The apostles also all died horrible, painful deaths at the hands of those wanting them to recind their belief. Why would they choose to die that way rather than say 'okay, I was lying' unless they really believed it?
Reply
Joined Oct 2004
Pirate's Life For Me
> bubble2 11,274 Posts
808 Reputation
PiratesSayARRR
12-03-2007 at 05:32 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:32 PM.
Quote from CovertCelery :
Why do people call "faith" as something that you have to try and make yourself believe in when there is hard evidence to back it up... And I've listed evidence above to put the evolution theory that it took millions/billions of years for living things to "evolve" out of pudding... The Carbon dating on that diamond proves that it is less than 58,000 years old; not nearly enough time for evolution to be correct on the origin of species...

But if science even gives evidence to the fact that we were actually "intelligently designed" - why would that be faith?

Let me ask this question arj. Why do you have to have "faith" in gravity? You can't see it, or touch it. Yet you know its there - because there is evidence (scientific) to prove it. Therefore, its not your faith in gravity - but rather your belief that brings it home to you...

I personally believe that if you look, you will find - and then you can believe w/ more than just faith... The trick to it is you have to look beyond just what you want to see, and look from a point of view that God DOES exist; and you will find evidence to back it up. If you look from the point of view that God does NOT exist, then you will only see what you want yourself to see.
or your are being delusional in thinking that g_d exists but actually doesn't because you want something so badly.

Scientists have the ability to date with Pb isotopes
Reply
Joined Feb 2007
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,709 Posts
230 Reputation
ThatOneNotThis
12-03-2007 at 05:34 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:34 PM.
Quote from Mavtech :
I didn't belittle anything or anyone. I simply asked you questions. I think people in situations like that often short suit themselves on credit when something awesome happens. Do I think it's spectacular and awesome that survived? Absolutely! Could I ever say it was God who saved you (or me if I were ever in a similar situation)? Not unless I saw him or spoke to him. You didn't say you saw him or spoke to him. You just said it was God's hand because of how close you were to death and survived. Just because events fell into place doesn't mean God did it. There's a whole bunch of chance and luck to figure in as well. You said yourself that you had the best doctor in Europe. So, I say he had more to do with it than anyone else. Give him the credit. He's a physical, tangible person who everyone knows exists and had the most direct contact with you. I'm not telling you how you should feel. Just stating my opinion. Also, I am not a "non-believer". I'm just not a full believer either. Like I said before, I'm a fence-sitter. Smilie

I believe what I see, hear, smell, and touch until I have reason to believe otherwise.
Mav, I respect what you're saying... You are definitelly on a good point. You can't see, hear, smell, or touch God......

What about gravity? does gravity exist? I'm not trying to be mean to you Mav, but you can't say that just because you can't identify it as being something tangible, doesn't mean it doesn't exist...

Remember back even just a hundred years ago or more... People died from bacteria, viruses (black death, plague, etc...).... They couldn't see them, touch them, smell, hear, etc... Yet they still existed.

The only difference is that we now have the capabilities to see them, and know that they are there... People thought that the world was flat too.... They didn't know any better because they couldn't prove it - they just saw the horizon, and thought "well that's where the earth must end". How wrong they were...

All I'm saying is that we don't have a "scientific way" to see God, or touch, or hear, or see him.... Essentially we don't have the scientific knowhow (don't think we ever will) to prove that God DOES NOT EXIST... Once someone finds a scientific way to disprove God's existence - THEN I will believe that God does not indeed exist...
Reply
Joined Mar 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 12,777 Posts
1,208 Reputation
Imerson
12-03-2007 at 05:35 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:35 PM.
If I may respectfully add my two cents...

I believe that there is at least some sort of higher power, some kind of god that created what we have today either by setting it into motion through evolution, just creating all of it, 6 day creation, or somewhere in between. I think this belief has a strong logical basis (which I do not want to debate here). Right now I have Christian beliefs (except hell), but even if Christianity is wrong, I would still believe in at least some form of higher power.

That being said, I also understand the position of atheists and agnostics. We really don't know what's out there unless we have experienced it or have proof of it. So I know where atheists, agnostics and "seekers" come from in that regard. I don't agree with this position, but I am respectful of those who hold it.

This is the issue with faith. Take for example, SlicKitty's experience (hope you don't mind, SK Wink)--she has strong conviction that there is a god because she has experienced a miracle. Does that mean she can convince anyone else? Maybe not, but she's pretty sure (or actually, knows) what she believes is true.

This is where I have an issue. Some would say SlicKitty is delusional or stupid for believing in a God, even though her experience has convinced her. It's hateful and wrong to call someone names for seeing things differently from you, yet this is the attitude I see from a lot of atheists.

Now, I am not trying to make a statement about atheists, rather about religious intolerance. I know atheists that are more kind and loving than religious people.

But, the attitude put forth by some atheists or agnostics is very hurtful to people like me, who believe in a higher power.

I would say nobody truly knows unless they have had a real experience, and that is debatable by those who do not believe. So I think it is wrong for anyone to attack someone else who has different beliefs.

I think it is possible to disagree without being attacking, mean or hurtful, and ideally this is how everyone would disagree.
Reply
Joined Oct 2004
Pirate's Life For Me
> bubble2 11,274 Posts
808 Reputation
PiratesSayARRR
12-03-2007 at 05:36 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:36 PM.
Quote from BrgnHntr :
Good point. The apostles also all died horrible, painful deaths at the hands of those wanting them to recind their belief. Why would they choose to die that way rather than say 'okay, I was lying' unless they really believed it?
I don't doubt the pure form the the cult the jesus started but when the church came to power many books were rewritten. There is more to religion than doing a good deed, there is money in it. Don't believe me...look at the catholic church. Look at all the nonprofits that make a ton of money off of believers.

This is why I choose to live my life for myself. I believe that everyone should strive for excellence and find a mean in between their vices. If everyone lived by the golden rule this earth would be much better off.
Reply
Joined Jan 2005
Pants down, always
> bubble2 11,702 Posts
1,770 Reputation
stimpy
12-03-2007 at 05:36 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:36 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
It could be:
me < universe
dog < me

God is not the only thing that's greater than you.
Iagree exactly ... but there are those that would rule out one or the other. It doesn't change any of the rest of my post.... but then those that wouldn't understand my post probably are the same ones that think they can understand everything. Big Grin
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Feb 2007
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,709 Posts
230 Reputation
ThatOneNotThis
12-03-2007 at 05:38 PM.
12-03-2007 at 05:38 PM.
Quote from PiratesSayARRR :
or your are being delusional in thinking that g_d exists but actually doesn't because you want something so badly.

Scientists have the ability to date with Pb isotopes
Ya know... Sometimes I wonder what Mr. Darwin thought about right before his death........???

Doesn't anyone wonder what must have gone through his head when he was on his deathbed?..... It was probably: "God I hope I was right"..... LMAO LMAO LMAO

Yes, they have Pb isotopes to date w/ - but ummmmm, how are you gonna test a rock that is made up of NOTHING BUT CARBON w/ Pb.....?
Reply
Page 14 of 58
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.