Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Only read if you are NOT religious and/or do not believe in any 'supreme' being (othe

77,018 212,304 December 2, 2007 at 08:48 PM in Question
personal attacks will not be tolerated and will be mod alerted, if you wish to set someone apart use generalities, such as specific religion not speific person on SD for example

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you dont get the right to feel insulted, u have been warned...

so, peeps, if you dont believe in god, do you feel that ones that do are delusional?

a lot of people will sight karma or other things as 'he got what he had coming' but i argue that it's all a mathematical randomness that on a small scale might seem like karma

perfect example is: when you play poker and u push with the best hand, a LOT of times, you can predict/be so sure that the card will come that will beat you even if the chance of it coming is less than 1:6. when the card comes, some might argue it as karma, but i argue that its all random, just on a small scale randomness doesn't work

discuss....

Community Wiki

Last Edited by Ram|bunc|tious December 6, 2007 at 06:15 AM


wikipost loves you too!

866 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2006
Chivalry-never outdated
> bubble2 13,690 Posts
Just Peachy
12-03-2007 at 07:13 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:13 PM.
Quote from IVIax :
I do agree with your logic completely. BUT the way a lot of religions portray god to be is forgiving, a great "thing", understanding, merciful, etc.

All Most of his laws are to "better" a person. Agree? (I would say all, but I don't know all of them)

That's what I don't understand -- how can "he" be forgiving and compassionate and want you to better yourself and be merciful, but ONLY to the people who believe in him. What about those who are agnostic -- they never said they don't believe in him, just that they're not sure if he exists or not... So they should be punished even if they bettered their lives and lived by MOST of his laws, but never believed in him?

somewhat hypocritical IMHO.
To you and Imerson (hi Imerson, long time no see.. at least, that I'm aware of!) Wink

Let's look at the times of Noah. People were doing what they wanted, when they wanted, falling off the straight and narrow, were pagens, some even cannibals. God had enough. Tells Noah to prepare for big whompin flooding. Noah cautions people around him (even as they made fun of him) of what was going to occur and to repent of their sins and prepare for the coming flood. Nobody listened. When the floods came, who was knocking on yon ark door to be let in? Those who felt Noah was crazy and believing in God was a terrible inconvenience. Was God merciful? To the sinners who died, I'm sure they'd say no. To Noah and his family, I'm sure they'd say yes. God needed to get rid of that which was ruining His earth. There would have been no need of a cleansing of the earth if God allowed himself to be more merciful, right? Everyone is given a chance, and along with that chance comes free will and the ability to seek knowledge.
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
L8: Grand Teacher
> bubble2 3,854 Posts
147 Reputation
killerbootsman
12-03-2007 at 07:19 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:19 PM.
Quote from Peachyum :
To you and Imerson (hi Imerson, long time no see.. at least, that I'm aware of!) Wink

Let's look at the times of Noah. People were doing what they wanted, when they wanted, falling off the straight and narrow, were pagens, some even cannibals. God had enough. Tells Noah to prepare for big whompin flooding. Noah cautions people around him (even as they made fun of him) of what was going to occur and to repent of their sins and prepare for the coming flood. Nobody listened. When the floods came, who was knocking on yon ark door to be let in? Those who felt Noah was crazy and believing in God was a terrible inconvenience. Was God merciful? To the sinners who died, I'm sure they'd say no. To Noah and his family, I'm sure they'd say yes. God needed to get rid of that which was ruining His earth. There would have been no need of a cleansing of the earth if God allowed himself to be more merciful, right? Everyone is given a chance, and along with that chance comes free will and the ability to seek knowledge.
But there is a difference between the story of Noah and ours... You mentioned the people were becoming "pagens" and "falling off the straight and narrow". I can't talk for Imerson and Max, but I don't feel like I'm living an unmoral life. In fact, without be a condescending bastard, I feel I'm living a life with more morals then some of my devoutly religious brothers and sisters. So who is really "falling off the straight and narrow"? Those who live unmoral and unethical lives or those who do not grant the existence of God.
Reply
Joined Oct 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 32,527 Posts
1,665 Reputation
arjunsr
12-03-2007 at 07:28 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:28 PM.
Quote from Peachyum :
To you and Imerson (hi Imerson, long time no see.. at least, that I'm aware of!) Wink

Let's look at the times of Noah. People were doing what they wanted, when they wanted, falling off the straight and narrow, were pagens, some even cannibals. God had enough. Tells Noah to prepare for big whompin flooding. Noah cautions people around him (even as they made fun of him) of what was going to occur and to repent of their sins and prepare for the coming flood. Nobody listened. When the floods came, who was knocking on yon ark door to be let in? Those who felt Noah was crazy and believing in God was a terrible inconvenience. Was God merciful? To the sinners who died, I'm sure they'd say no. To Noah and his family, I'm sure they'd say yes. God needed to get rid of that which was ruining His earth. There would have been no need of a cleansing of the earth if God allowed himself to be more merciful, right? Everyone is given a chance, and along with that chance comes free will and the ability to seek knowledge.
to get this somewhat back on topic, this is what some find "delusional"

the story of the ark said 2 of every species. aside from the miracle of a boat that could carry 2 of every kind, carrying every single type of beetle known of, animals only found in some parts of the worlds; what we know of in breeding.. if we all descended from a common ancestor many things would have died out thousands of years ago.
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
12-03-2007 at 07:28 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:28 PM.
Quote from Peachyum :
To you and Imerson (hi Imerson, long time no see.. at least, that I'm aware of!) Wink

Let's look at the times of Noah. People were doing what they wanted, when they wanted, falling off the straight and narrow, were pagens, some even cannibals. God had enough. Tells Noah to prepare for big whompin flooding. Noah cautions people around him (even as they made fun of him) of what was going to occur and to repent of their sins and prepare for the coming flood. Nobody listened. When the floods came, who was knocking on yon ark door to be let in? Those who felt Noah was crazy and believing in God was a terrible inconvenience. Was God merciful? To the sinners who died, I'm sure they'd say no. To Noah and his family, I'm sure they'd say yes. God needed to get rid of that which was ruining His earth. There would have been no need of a cleansing of the earth if God allowed himself to be more merciful, right? Everyone is given a chance, and along with that chance comes free will and the ability to seek knowledge.
Let's assume I believe in Noah and the arc (* assuming I believe it happened, would assume I believe in god, and assume that I believe what was written in the bible/books is true)

Now, IMO if god was truly merciful, then he would forgive those who made mistakes through their lives.

I guess I have a problem, with Christianity portraying their god to be fully merciful and forgiving and caring and loving, but that would be only to his people. And yes I understand your POV as well "why should we forgive you, if Jesus bled for us believers, and you guys just want to freeload".

I don't think this argument is going to go far beyond this point (at least for me).
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
Chivalry-never outdated
> bubble2 13,690 Posts
Just Peachy
12-03-2007 at 07:29 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:29 PM.
Quote from killerbootsman :
But there is a difference between the story of Noah and ours... You mentioned the people were becoming "pagens" and "falling off the straight and narrow". I can't talk for Imerson and Max, but I don't feel like I'm living an unmoral life. In fact, without be a condescending bastard, I feel I'm living a life with more morals then some of my devoutly religious brothers and sisters. So who is really "falling off the straight and narrow"? Those who live unmoral and unethical lives or those who do not grant the existence of God.
Those who are wolves in sheeps clothing (as it were) who claim to be righteous and are not would find themselves in a world of hurt when Judgment came. They would be worse off in claiming to know God than you who claim not to know Him at all. They are hypocrites and will be dealt with accordingly.
Reply
Joined Mar 2006
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 12,777 Posts
1,208 Reputation
Imerson
12-03-2007 at 07:30 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:30 PM.
Hi Peachyum hug

Quote from Peachyum :
To you and Imerson (hi Imerson, long time no see.. at least, that I'm aware of!) Wink

Let's look at the times of Noah. People were doing what they wanted, when they wanted, falling off the straight and narrow, were pagens, some even cannibals. God had enough. Tells Noah to prepare for big whompin flooding. Noah cautions people around him (even as they made fun of him) of what was going to occur and to repent of their sins and prepare for the coming flood. Nobody listened. When the floods came, who was knocking on yon ark door to be let in? Those who felt Noah was crazy and believing in God was a terrible inconvenience. Was God merciful? To the sinners who died, I'm sure they'd say no. To Noah and his family, I'm sure they'd say yes. God needed to get rid of that which was ruining His earth. There would have been no need of a cleansing of the earth if God allowed himself to be more merciful, right? Everyone is given a chance, and along with that chance comes free will and the ability to seek knowledge.
The free will part is highly arguable (though I don't believe God sending someone to hell for eternity with no free will is right either). And look at it this way - life on this earth is nothing compared to eternity. God could still have had mercy on those people after death (and as far as I know, nothing says He hasn't - in fact the Bible says Jesus preached to the spirits in prison who were disobedient in the time of the flood).

I just don't see God that way anymore. It helps answer the question about people like residents of foreign countries, who are sincere in their beliefs but are not Christian. It's opened my eyes to see a world that God truly loves, and helped strengthen my faith.
Reply
Last edited by Imerson December 3, 2007 at 07:33 PM.
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
12-03-2007 at 07:32 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:32 PM.
Quote from killerbootsman :
But there is a difference between the story of Noah and ours... You mentioned the people were becoming "pagens" and "falling off the straight and narrow". I can't talk for Imerson and Max, but I don't feel like I'm living an unmoral life. In fact, without be a condescending bastard, I feel I'm living a life with more morals then some of my devoutly religious brothers and sisters. So who is really "falling off the straight and narrow"? Those who live unmoral and unethical lives or those who do not grant the existence of God.
As for me, I'm living a moral life, and try to better myself. BUT I'm probably not doing as much as you are.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Sep 2006
Chivalry-never outdated
> bubble2 13,690 Posts
Just Peachy
12-03-2007 at 07:33 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:33 PM.
Quote from arjunsr :
to get this somewhat back on topic, this is what some find "delusional"

the story of the ark said 2 of every species. aside from the miracle of a boat that could carry 2 of every kind, carrying every single type of beetle known of, animals only found in some parts of the worlds; what we know of in breeding.. if we all descended from a common ancestor many things would have died out thousands of years ago.
Wouldn't you just love to be able to go up to Mt. Ararat and have a looksee at what they've got going on there? Big Grin

Arj, about the only thing I can really say about this is that if my God is able to create the heavens and the earth, am I really going to get snarky about how He went about loading up the animals he created two by two, or how it is that we all are descendants of three couples? shake head
Reply
Joined Oct 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 32,527 Posts
1,665 Reputation
arjunsr
12-03-2007 at 07:45 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:45 PM.
Quote from Peachyum :
Wouldn't you just love to be able to go up to Mt. Ararat and have a looksee at what they've got going on there? Big Grin

Arj, about the only thing I can really say about this is that if my God is able to create the heavens and the earth, am I really going to get snarky about how He went about loading up the animals he created two by two, or how it is that we all are descendants of three couples? shake head
so when does it start? when does mating with your brothers/sisters become bad, and when is it god's plan?

its engrained into just about all species.. mating with family is bad.
Reply
Joined Jun 2004
Damn You Scuba Steve
> bubble2 1,808 Posts
1,202 Reputation
Scubastevie
12-03-2007 at 07:48 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:48 PM.
I believe in the God that the catholic church teaches, I do not believe what the catholic church does and say.
I don't want to argue if there is one or not, I just like to feel there is
Reply
Joined Feb 2007
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,709 Posts
230 Reputation
ThatOneNotThis
12-03-2007 at 07:49 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:49 PM.
Quote from arjunsr :
i can test gravity. drop a ball. drop something else. go to the moon. drop something. they act in a specifc repeated predictible way based off the mass of the planet. that's scientific method. make a hypothesis, test it.

that doesn't work with faith based creationism. you can't test things when the basis is as far as our current understanding on how the universe there's no other logical explanation than someone had to make it.

i broguth it up in another thread.. but like the ancient greeks who came up with gods to answer every question. how did the earth stay up? well a god held it on his shoulders. how did thunder happen? a god gets mad and throws them down. science explained how both of those things happen by an explanation accepted by most of the world.

if (big if, but just for argument sake) we find a series of well preserved fossils that show exactly how evolution of man happened from apes. what then?


dr j> i don't think religion was used to control people at the begining. all the major religions stress living a good life. its jsut societies nature to figure out things. hamurabi's code was thousands of years before christ. it still found killing to be wrong. however, it was used that way quickly afterwards.
Ok. No prob. You say that scientific theory hypothesees, and testing..... Just take the C14 data I gave an example about Arj.... Not only did they make a hypothesis, AND they tested it - BUT they did is using accepted scientific methods... They used science to prove that what is being taught is wrong...

The conclusion is very much based on science... C14 proves that it indeed does not take millions/billions of years to make a diamond... The theory that evolution is based upon tries to hold true to million/billions of years... However, those millions and billions of years are being proven to be incorrect... The starting point of evolution RELIES upon millions and billions of years for it to be correct... less than 58,000 years does NOT give evolution NEARLY enough time to "unfold" by itself.

Thus the "start" of evolution (origin of species) is incorrect. Thus, only one alternative..... Since there is not nearly enough time for "life to start by itself by a statisitical percentage" - it means that intelligent design HAS TO BE a credible theory.... Otherwise, the origin of species has to be modified to show that ALL of life on this planet started less than 58,000 years ago... Our current scientific models will all point to the fact that there is not nearly enough time for life to have spontaneously "evolved from primortial ooze" in that small amount of time...

Which means intelligent design, and to *me* it means that God's existence has been "scientifically proven".... You all keep saying.... "SHOW ME SCIENTIFIC PROOF".......................

the scientific facts for intelligent design are smacking people on the side of the head, yet they STILL don't want to believe it....
Reply
Joined Dec 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 26,586 Posts
3,338 Reputation
Mavtech
12-03-2007 at 07:49 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:49 PM.
Quote from CovertCelery :
Mav, I respect what you're saying... You are definitelly on a good point. You can't see, hear, smell, or touch God......

What about gravity? does gravity exist? I'm not trying to be mean to you Mav, but you can't say that just because you can't identify it as being something tangible, doesn't mean it doesn't exist...

Remember back even just a hundred years ago or more... People died from bacteria, viruses (black death, plague, etc...).... They couldn't see them, touch them, smell, hear, etc... Yet they still existed.

The only difference is that we now have the capabilities to see them, and know that they are there... People thought that the world was flat too.... They didn't know any better because they couldn't prove it - they just saw the horizon, and thought "well that's where the earth must end". How wrong they were...

All I'm saying is that we don't have a "scientific way" to see God, or touch, or hear, or see him.... Essentially we don't have the scientific knowhow (don't think we ever will) to prove that God DOES NOT EXIST... Once someone finds a scientific way to disprove God's existence - THEN I will believe that God does not indeed exist...
I can see gravity in action. I can look in a microscope and see a bacteria or virus and watch them kill cells. I have something to go on when I say they exist. I can physically show someone. No one can physically show anyone anything that has to do with God. Until I have something to go on to say God exists, I will stay on the fence and simply say "I just don't know". I'm ok with that. I don't have to have answers for everything.

When I was in college, I was in a real bad car wreck. I was sleeping in the passenger seat when my roommate lost control on I-95. We did 360s down I-95, flipped over, slid about 50 yards upside-down into the water. All the glass shattered around us. I walked away with nothing but a piece of glass in my elbow. Did God play a part? How many people would say he did? Well, I say "I just don't know". If he did, "thanks a bunch God". But, I have no evidence to believe that he chose that it wasn't my time to go. I have no reason to believe anything other than that I was one lucky son of a bitch. It was 12:18 AM. At this time, my mother woke up suddenly from a deep sleep 250 miles away. Coincidence? Or did someone tell her something? I simply do not know.
Reply
Joined Feb 2006
R U an ultracrepidarian?
> bubble2 77,018 Posts
212,304 Reputation
Original Poster
Pro
Sr. Deal Editor
iconian | Staff
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
all i have to say right now is: Yawn
that was a nice 4 hr nap Big Grin

where were we?
Reply
Joined Sep 2006
IVIodel citizen
> bubble2 19,431 Posts
836 Reputation
Fallacy
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
Quote from CovertCelery :
Ok. No prob. You say that scientific theory hypothesees, and testing..... Just take the C14 data I gave an example about Arj.... Not only did they make a hypothesis, AND they tested it - BUT they did is using accepted scientific methods... They used science to prove that what is being taught is wrong...

The conclusion is very much based on science... C14 proves that it indeed does not take millions/billions of years to make a diamond... The theory that evolution is based upon tries to hold true to million/billions of years... However, those millions and billions of years are being proven to be incorrect... The starting point of evolution RELIES upon millions and billions of years for it to be correct... less than 58,000 years does NOT give evolution NEARLY enough time to "unfold" by itself.

Thus the "start" of evolution (origin of species) is incorrect. Thus, only one alternative..... Since there is not nearly enough time for "life to start by itself by a statisitical percentage" - it means that intelligent design HAS TO BE a credible theory.... Otherwise, the origin of species has to be modified to show that ALL of life on this planet started less than 58,000 years ago... Our current scientific models will all point to the fact that there is not nearly enough time for life to have spontaneously "evolved from primortial ooze" in that small amount of time...

Which means intelligent design, and to *me* it means that God's existence has been "scientifically proven".... You all keep saying.... "SHOW ME SCIENTIFIC PROOF".......................

the scientific facts for intelligent design are smacking people on the side of the head, yet they STILL don't want to believe it....
BUT science being wrong, does not automatically make religion right.

Science says the world existed 58,000 years ago (according to this new "theory"), religion still says only thousands, not 10's of thousands. So could it be they're both wrong?

OR this science experiment does NOT prove everything. It could have other explanations in it (errors in analysis, errors in C14, etc. etc. etc.), and the world REALLY did exist for millions of billions of years. Until this new theory is made mainstream, I wont believe there are no flaws in it.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Oct 2003
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 32,527 Posts
1,665 Reputation
arjunsr
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
12-03-2007 at 07:55 PM.
Quote from CovertCelery :
Ok. No prob. You say that scientific theory hypothesees, and testing..... Just take the C14 data I gave an example about Arj.... Not only did they make a hypothesis, AND they tested it - BUT they did is using accepted scientific methods... They used science to prove that what is being taught is wrong...

The conclusion is very much based on science... C14 proves that it indeed does not take millions/billions of years to make a diamond... The theory that evolution is based upon tries to hold true to million/billions of years... However, those millions and billions of years are being proven to be incorrect... The starting point of evolution RELIES upon millions and billions of years for it to be correct... less than 58,000 years does NOT give evolution NEARLY enough time to "unfold" by itself.

Thus the "start" of evolution (origin of species) is incorrect. Thus, only one alternative..... Since there is not nearly enough time for "life to start by itself by a statisitical percentage" - it means that intelligent design HAS TO BE a credible theory.... Otherwise, the origin of species has to be modified to show that ALL of life on this planet started less than 58,000 years ago... Our current scientific models will all point to the fact that there is not nearly enough time for life to have spontaneously "evolved from primortial ooze" in that small amount of time...

Which means intelligent design, and to *me* it means that God's existence has been "scientifically proven".... You all keep saying.... "SHOW ME SCIENTIFIC PROOF".......................

the scientific facts for intelligent design are smacking people on the side of the head, yet they STILL don't want to believe it....
science isn't infallible and they say as much. when we find new things that show what went wrong in our initial experiment, we revise and make a new theory.that's how science works.

i have more faith in sciencetific method though, then something written thousands of years ago. that's me.i put my faith in man eventually figuring out how the universe leads instead of saying i don't know, a creator must have done it.
Reply
Page 17 of 58
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.