Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

So What Does Everyone Think About Deflate-Gate?

25,141 707 January 22, 2015 at 12:50 PM in Sporting Goods
The title says it. What does everyone think about this bizarre "Deflate-Gate" deal that is far more interesting that this year's Super Bowl? Belichick reaffirmed that he knew nothing at all about the football preparation and denied having anything to do with it.

Tom Brady is supposed to be talking publicly very soon and may be admitting to arranging to have the footballs prepped to the way he likes them.

So, is this a big deal? Is this something that happens with pretty much every team and it has just become public?

469 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-28-2015 at 01:21 PM.
01-28-2015 at 01:21 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
Paint makes a pretty good argument that the attendant could have indeed deflated all of the footballs in the 90 seconds he was in the bathroom. The guy in the video did the deflation 12 times. The fact that he missed two balls and did two of them twice actually supports why one of the game balls was two pounds low, one was fully inflated, and the rest were one pound low. In the rush the experimenter missed two footballs. In the rush the attendant missed one. Plausible.

As far as the single person bathroom--the experiment was done in a single stall. Pretty good chance that a full bathroom with a sink and maybe both a toilet and a urinal would be larger than a single stall with just a toilet, even allowing that the stall appeared to be a larger handicapped stall.

The attendant would have had 24 balls with him but I'm sure they wouldn't be all mixed together in one bag. So while taking up a little more space I wouldn't think it would be much of a hindrance. Just toss the other bag off to the side and get to the deflation.

The 77 seconds falls well under the 90 seconds the attendant was in the bathroom. For the experiment they had determined that it took 2.2 seconds to deflate the football by 2psi. So the guy deflating the football is estimating that time when he is deflating each football. Granted, that is a pretty difficult task.

However, there is a huge margin of error built in to the experiment already. As we have already heard the actual footballs from the game were deflated only 1psi, with one apparently not deflated at all and one deflated 2psi, as previously discussed. So, if it takes 2.2 seconds to deflate the football 2psi, it is reasonable that it likely takes about 1.1 seconds to deflate the football 1psi. At least that should be close enough for this experiment. So the guy in the video was shooting for 2.2 seconds. Even if in reality he only held the pin in each ball for around half of his desired time, it should have been long enough to let out 1psi.

It would have been nicer if they had shown the actual pressure in the footballs after the test, but you really can't shoot down the results just because you don't like the argument. It isn't conclusive, but I think the experiment indeed shows it would be possible for the attendant to deflate all twelve balls in 90 seconds.

Myth not yet busted.
But the experiment is not nearly as conclusive as some would have you believe. There were multiple issues with it, which is mainly what bothers me. If they had just taken a little more time to conduct it a little more properly and with a little more attention to detail, I wouldn't have nearly as much of an objection. But, as-is, that sort of sloppiness doesn't really encourage trustworthiness.
Reply
Joined Oct 2007
Foxiest of the Hounds
> bubble2 13,846 Posts
474 Reputation
godfather927
01-28-2015 at 02:07 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:07 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
Paint makes a pretty good argument that the attendant could have indeed deflated all of the footballs in the 90 seconds he was in the bathroom. The guy in the video did the deflation 12 times. The fact that he missed two balls and did two of them twice actually supports why one of the game balls was two pounds low, one was fully inflated, and the rest were one pound low. In the rush the experimenter missed two footballs. In the rush the attendant missed one. Plausible.
That's the hilarious part about it, Paint's obviously a pats fanboy and he was actually arguing against the 90-second deflation theory as being plausible. He went in circles so many times that he ended up building a case against himself!
Rofl2
Reply
Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
> bubble2 25,141 Posts
707 Reputation
Original Poster
Iaaaiws
01-28-2015 at 02:11 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:11 PM.
Quote from godfather927 :
That's the hilarious part about it, Paint's obviously a pats fanboy and he was actually arguing against the 90-second deflation theory as being plausible. He went in circles so many times that he ended up building a case against himself!
Rofl2
I admit I really couldn't figure out which side Paint was on with some of his arguments. laugh out loud
Reply
Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-28-2015 at 02:13 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:13 PM.
Quote from godfather927 :
That's the hilarious part about it, Paint's obviously a pats fanboy and he was actually arguing against the 90-second deflation theory as being plausible. He went in circles so many times that he ended up building a case against himself!
Rofl2
Um, I really don't even follow football all that much. And I'm on the East Cost, but pretty much as far south as you can go on it, so no geographic ties either.

As I've said before in this thread, it just sounds like a manufactured controversy that's over some silly shit that's easily explained by a simple scientific explanation that has also been proven via videotaped experiments.
Reply
Joined Oct 2007
Foxiest of the Hounds
> bubble2 13,846 Posts
474 Reputation
godfather927
01-28-2015 at 02:16 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:16 PM.
Quote from PaintTheSkyGrey :
Um, I really don't even follow football all that much. And I'm on the East Cost, but pretty much as far south as you can go on it, so no geographic ties either.

As I've said before in this thread, it just sounds like a manufactured controversy that's over some silly shit that's easily explained by a simple scientific explanation that has also been proven via videotaped experiments.
Yeah that's cool man, enjoy the asterisk. Thumbup
Reply
Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-28-2015 at 02:18 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:18 PM.
Quote from godfather927 :
Yeah that's cool man, enjoy the asterisk. Thumbup
Why would I care about an asterisk?

Sounds like you're butthurt about your team getting dominated by the Pats. That's the only reason I can figure you'd be spewing this vitriol.
Reply
Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
> bubble2 25,141 Posts
707 Reputation
Original Poster
Iaaaiws
01-28-2015 at 02:44 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:44 PM.
Quote from PaintTheSkyGrey :
Why would I care about an asterisk?

Sounds like you're butthurt about your team getting dominated by the Pats. That's the only reason I can figure you'd be spewing this vitriol.
You aren't fooling anybody fanboi. Nono2

PAintTheSkygrey
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-28-2015 at 02:59 PM.
01-28-2015 at 02:59 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
You aren't fooling anybody fanboi. Nono2

PAintTheSkygrey
EEK!

I thought it was hidden! Whee
Reply
Joined Nov 2005
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 39,439 Posts
5,562 Reputation
Dr. J
01-28-2015 at 03:20 PM.
01-28-2015 at 03:20 PM.
Quote from Iaaaiws :
What would the math work out to if a game were being played somewhere that was actually cold instead of 50F?

Let's go back to the "Ice Bowl" where the temperature was -15F. If the rule had been in place back then what would the initial pressure have to have been set at to keep the ball above the !2.5psi on the field?

Nothing to do with this controversy, I'm just curious if it is even realistically possible to stay within the rules. There are many games played at temperatures right around freezing or in the twenties.
80F vs -15F is a ~ 17% drop. A pre-inflated 13.5 PSI ball would be down to 8.5 PSI; 12.5 to 7.7.
Reply
Joined Jul 2010
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 8,282 Posts
341 Reputation
Jethrine
01-28-2015 at 04:23 PM.
01-28-2015 at 04:23 PM.
Not a Patriots fan.

Super Bowl XLIX: Patriots by 14.
Reply
Joined Dec 2008
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 9,053 Posts
2,447 Reputation
fireballs
01-28-2015 at 04:36 PM.
01-28-2015 at 04:36 PM.
Quote from Dr. J :
80F vs -15F is a ~ 17% drop. A pre-inflated 13.5 PSI ball would be down to 8.5 PSI; 12.5 to 7.7.
So if thermodynamics actually makes this big of a deal wouldn't people have noticed 7.7 balls in the past? That's extremely low.

Personally I think the 3 or 4 layers to the football act as insulation, a football is actually fairly thicker skinned than a car tire. I really am not sure that thermodynamics effects the ball as much as some people say. Bill Bye and the scientists in the article I posted a few posts ago think the Patriots are wrong.

Also remember that this guy probably has don't this a lot and has lots of practices. Of course the guy who's only practiced it a few times isn't going to be as efficient as a long time seasoned pro.

Again things like this don't help the NFL and especially Rodger Godell. Godell has had a really tough year and if he could easily make this disappear he would. He can't just wipe it under the rug though because the thought from the NFL and other teams is that the Patriots gained a unfair advantage purposely.

Belicheat said that spygate didn't give them any advantage. Then why cheat? Let's remember Belicheat was a career assistant besides the time he was pretty bad as head coach of the Browns. Let's also remember that Brady was a life long back up pretty much.

Now let's remember that the patriots started 10-0 in the playoffs and 3-0 in the super bowl Bradys first 5 years before spygate. Between spygate and coming into this year the Patriots went 8-8 in the playoffs and 0-2 in the super bowl.

Usually quarterbacks and coaches get better with experience. Really weird that they were far far more successful before getting caught cheating the first time.

The article I posted the other day showed that until 2007 the patriots were below average in fumble protection. In 2007 and since they flipped a switch and have been BY FAR the best at protecting against fumbles in the history of the league.

We all know they Patriots cycle through so many players. How can they be historicly the best at protecting against fumbles every year regardless off who is even on the field for them?

A deflated ball really helps the quarterback but helps every player get a better grip on the ball, running backs receivers and quarterbacks.

Deflated balls = less fumbles for the team in addition to better control and accuracy on the passes.

Look up the Patriots record since Belicheat in the second half of the season, especially at home. Its far better than their first half. Why?

Because that's when the weather is colder and they have a bigger advantage because they are deflating balls. Deflated balls are really important when its cold because the balls semi freeze and are hard to grip.
Reply
Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-29-2015 at 02:30 PM.
01-29-2015 at 02:30 PM.
Quote from fireballs :
Belicheat said that spygate didn't give them any advantage. Then why cheat? Let's remember Belicheat was a career assistant besides the time he was pretty bad as head coach of the Browns. Let's also remember that Brady was a life long back up pretty much.

Now let's remember that the patriots started 10-0 in the playoffs and 3-0 in the super bowl Bradys first 5 years before spygate. Between spygate and coming into this year the Patriots went 8-8 in the playoffs and 0-2 in the super bowl.

Usually quarterbacks and coaches get better with experience. Really weird that they were far far more successful before getting caught cheating the first time.
From what I understand (and as I've said before, not a huge football guy), it's not that BB did anything necessarily wrong other than recording from the wrong location. That other teams did the exact same thing; he just stretched the rules and did it from the field instead of from the designated location. And, as he said in his press conference a few days ago, 80,000 other people all saw the same signs and signals.

They didn't even pretend they weren't doing anything wrong. They admitted they were recording from an unauthorized location, paid their fines, gave up their draft pick, and carried on.

Quote from fireballs :
The article I posted the other day showed that until 2007 the patriots were below average in fumble protection. In 2007 and since they flipped a switch and have been BY FAR the best at protecting against fumbles in the history of the league.

We all know they Patriots cycle through so many players. How can they be historicly the best at protecting against fumbles every year regardless off who is even on the field for them?

A deflated ball really helps the quarterback but helps every player get a better grip on the ball, running backs receivers and quarterbacks.

Deflated balls = less fumbles for the team in addition to better control and accuracy on the passes.
And I actually just read this article that hugely debunks your article:

http://regressing.deadspin.com/wh...1681805710

Quote from fireballs :
Look up the Patriots record since Belicheat in the second half of the season, especially at home. Its far better than their first half. Why?

Because that's when the weather is colder and they have a bigger advantage because they are deflating balls. Deflated balls are really important when its cold because the balls semi freeze and are hard to grip.
All speculative with zero basis in factual reality.
Reply
Joined Jul 2009
Permanently Bland
> bubble2 15,176 Posts
2,874 Reputation
PaintTheSkyGrey
01-29-2015 at 02:36 PM.
01-29-2015 at 02:36 PM.
Referees at Super Bowl 49 will adopt a new hand signal to indicate eligible and ineligible receivers, according to Seattle Seahawks' coach Pete Carroll, via Bob Condotta of The Seattle Times. Carroll said the referees will point at ineligible receivers and make a missed field goal sign, according to Condotta, and that they will point two hands at eligible players, according to Ian Rapoport of the NFL Network.

Carroll pointed out that the league has never done something like this before. It's clear they want as little controversy surrounding this Super Bowl as possible, and they want to avoid the questions that came out following the New England Patriots' wins over the Baltimore Ravens and Indianapolis Colts thus far in the postseason.

While those games sparked some serious controversy over eligible and ineligible receivers, the Patriots didn't actually do anything wrong, per the NFL rulebook. There was definite trickery at play, but running the plays they did was not against the rules, as we noted in this extensive article on what exactly they did and why exactly the Ravens and Colts were confused.
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/...r-new-rule

Scratchchin
Reply
Joined Aug 2011
Permanent Ban
> bubble2 2,019 Posts
457 Reputation
cr8ter
01-29-2015 at 03:38 PM.
01-29-2015 at 03:38 PM.
don't both sides use the same ball? If not, that's the problem.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jan 2006
Piece of work
> bubble2 18,933 Posts
670 Reputation
Landers
01-29-2015 at 03:40 PM.
01-29-2015 at 03:40 PM.
Quote from cr8ter :
don't both sides use the same ball? If not, that's the problem.
I recommend reading either this thread or an article on the issue. I'm sure this and many of your questions would be quickly answered that way..
Reply
Page 18 of 32
Start the Conversation
 

More Sporting Goods Deals & Discounts

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.