Joined Jan 2004
Here's to the future
Forum Thread
So What Does Everyone Think About Deflate-Gate?
January 22, 2015 at
12:50 PM
in
Sporting Goods
The title says it. What does everyone think about this bizarre "Deflate-Gate" deal that is far more interesting that this year's Super Bowl? Belichick reaffirmed that he knew nothing at all about the football preparation and denied having anything to do with it.
Tom Brady is supposed to be talking publicly very soon and may be admitting to arranging to have the footballs prepped to the way he likes them.
So, is this a big deal? Is this something that happens with pretty much every team and it has just become public?
Tom Brady is supposed to be talking publicly very soon and may be admitting to arranging to have the footballs prepped to the way he likes them.
So, is this a big deal? Is this something that happens with pretty much every team and it has just become public?
469 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
As far as the single person bathroom--the experiment was done in a single stall. Pretty good chance that a full bathroom with a sink and maybe both a toilet and a urinal would be larger than a single stall with just a toilet, even allowing that the stall appeared to be a larger handicapped stall.
The attendant would have had 24 balls with him but I'm sure they wouldn't be all mixed together in one bag. So while taking up a little more space I wouldn't think it would be much of a hindrance. Just toss the other bag off to the side and get to the deflation.
The 77 seconds falls well under the 90 seconds the attendant was in the bathroom. For the experiment they had determined that it took 2.2 seconds to deflate the football by 2psi. So the guy deflating the football is estimating that time when he is deflating each football. Granted, that is a pretty difficult task.
However, there is a huge margin of error built in to the experiment already. As we have already heard the actual footballs from the game were deflated only 1psi, with one apparently not deflated at all and one deflated 2psi, as previously discussed. So, if it takes 2.2 seconds to deflate the football 2psi, it is reasonable that it likely takes about 1.1 seconds to deflate the football 1psi. At least that should be close enough for this experiment. So the guy in the video was shooting for 2.2 seconds. Even if in reality he only held the pin in each ball for around half of his desired time, it should have been long enough to let out 1psi.
It would have been nicer if they had shown the actual pressure in the footballs after the test, but you really can't shoot down the results just because you don't like the argument. It isn't conclusive, but I think the experiment indeed shows it would be possible for the attendant to deflate all twelve balls in 90 seconds.
Myth not yet busted.
As I've said before in this thread, it just sounds like a manufactured controversy that's over some silly shit that's easily explained by a simple scientific explanation that has also been proven via videotaped experiments.
As I've said before in this thread, it just sounds like a manufactured controversy that's over some silly shit that's easily explained by a simple scientific explanation that has also been proven via videotaped experiments.
Sounds like you're butthurt about your team getting dominated by the Pats. That's the only reason I can figure you'd be spewing this vitriol.
Sounds like you're butthurt about your team getting dominated by the Pats. That's the only reason I can figure you'd be spewing this vitriol.
PAintTheSkygrey
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
PAintTheSkygrey
I thought it was hidden!
Let's go back to the "Ice Bowl" where the temperature was -15F. If the rule had been in place back then what would the initial pressure have to have been set at to keep the ball above the !2.5psi on the field?
Nothing to do with this controversy, I'm just curious if it is even realistically possible to stay within the rules. There are many games played at temperatures right around freezing or in the twenties.
Super Bowl XLIX: Patriots by 14.
Personally I think the 3 or 4 layers to the football act as insulation, a football is actually fairly thicker skinned than a car tire. I really am not sure that thermodynamics effects the ball as much as some people say. Bill Bye and the scientists in the article I posted a few posts ago think the Patriots are wrong.
Also remember that this guy probably has don't this a lot and has lots of practices. Of course the guy who's only practiced it a few times isn't going to be as efficient as a long time seasoned pro.
Again things like this don't help the NFL and especially Rodger Godell. Godell has had a really tough year and if he could easily make this disappear he would. He can't just wipe it under the rug though because the thought from the NFL and other teams is that the Patriots gained a unfair advantage purposely.
Belicheat said that spygate didn't give them any advantage. Then why cheat? Let's remember Belicheat was a career assistant besides the time he was pretty bad as head coach of the Browns. Let's also remember that Brady was a life long back up pretty much.
Now let's remember that the patriots started 10-0 in the playoffs and 3-0 in the super bowl Bradys first 5 years before spygate. Between spygate and coming into this year the Patriots went 8-8 in the playoffs and 0-2 in the super bowl.
Usually quarterbacks and coaches get better with experience. Really weird that they were far far more successful before getting caught cheating the first time.
The article I posted the other day showed that until 2007 the patriots were below average in fumble protection. In 2007 and since they flipped a switch and have been BY FAR the best at protecting against fumbles in the history of the league.
We all know they Patriots cycle through so many players. How can they be historicly the best at protecting against fumbles every year regardless off who is even on the field for them?
A deflated ball really helps the quarterback but helps every player get a better grip on the ball, running backs receivers and quarterbacks.
Deflated balls = less fumbles for the team in addition to better control and accuracy on the passes.
Look up the Patriots record since Belicheat in the second half of the season, especially at home. Its far better than their first half. Why?
Because that's when the weather is colder and they have a bigger advantage because they are deflating balls. Deflated balls are really important when its cold because the balls semi freeze and are hard to grip.
Now let's remember that the patriots started 10-0 in the playoffs and 3-0 in the super bowl Bradys first 5 years before spygate. Between spygate and coming into this year the Patriots went 8-8 in the playoffs and 0-2 in the super bowl.
Usually quarterbacks and coaches get better with experience. Really weird that they were far far more successful before getting caught cheating the first time.
They didn't even pretend they weren't doing anything wrong. They admitted they were recording from an unauthorized location, paid their fines, gave up their draft pick, and carried on.
We all know they Patriots cycle through so many players. How can they be historicly the best at protecting against fumbles every year regardless off who is even on the field for them?
A deflated ball really helps the quarterback but helps every player get a better grip on the ball, running backs receivers and quarterbacks.
Deflated balls = less fumbles for the team in addition to better control and accuracy on the passes.
http://regressing.dead
Because that's when the weather is colder and they have a bigger advantage because they are deflating balls. Deflated balls are really important when its cold because the balls semi freeze and are hard to grip.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.