Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
16-Pack AmazonBasics AA 2000mAh Rechargeable Batteries Expired
$22
$27.49
w/ S&S + Free S&H
Amazon.com has 16-Pack AmazonBasics AA 2000mAh Rechargeable Batteries on sale for $21.99 when you clip the 20% off coupon found on the product page and checkout with Subscribe and Save. Shipping is free w/ Prime or on $25+ orders. Thanks newcal
Note: Must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically limited to one per account. You may cancel Subscribe & Save any time after your order ships.
Note: Must be logged in to clip coupons; coupons are typically limited to one per account. You may cancel Subscribe & Save any time after your order ships.
Editor's Notes & Price Research
Written by
- Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited music, unlimited video streaming & more.
- If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Original Post
Written by
Edited July 14, 2020
at 01:10 AM
I am looking for some additional rechargeable AA batteries to feed the hungry kids toys, and found the 16-pack 2000mAh Amazon Basics AA batteries to have 20% off coupon for the first shipment with subscribe and save. Coupled with 5% off on S&S, the price came down to $20.62, or $1.29 a piece. This is close to the lowest price according to CCC.
I have ordered these batteries before. Overall very satisfied. They do not have the highest mAh ratings, but for kids toys, the cost per battery is more important than the charge per battery--at least this is how I feel.
Remember to cancel S&S after the first shipment, if you do not want new ones on a regular basis.
https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasi...e3
Also 12 pack 800 mAh AAA, with 20% off first order with S&S, comes to $10.12 before tax.
https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasi...e3
I have ordered these batteries before. Overall very satisfied. They do not have the highest mAh ratings, but for kids toys, the cost per battery is more important than the charge per battery--at least this is how I feel.
Remember to cancel S&S after the first shipment, if you do not want new ones on a regular basis.
https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasi...e3
Also 12 pack 800 mAh AAA, with 20% off first order with S&S, comes to $10.12 before tax.
https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasi...e3
in
Batteries
(7)
Get Amazon coupons
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Batteries Deals
View All
Frontpage
$8.05
w/ Subscribe & Save
16
12
Popular
Popular
Frontpage
$99
+ Free Shipping
56
46
| Rating: | (4 out of 5 stars) |
| Reviews: | 5,131 Amazon Reviews |
| Product Name: | AmazonBasics AA Rechargeable Batteries (16-Pack) Pre-charged - Battery Packaging May Vary |
| Product Description: | Low self discharge battery, Minimum capacity 1900 mAh, Protection for Overcharge, Can meet HSF requirement. An Amazon Brand. |
| Manufacturer: | AmazonBasics |
| Model Number: | RFQ419 |
| Product SKU: | B007B9NV8Q |
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
119 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Personally, I have had about 50 of these batteries from previous purchases, and they work great for me. Never had an issue. Of course, I care more about being green and replacing all toy batteries with rechargeable, rather than whether one brand of battery can hold 5% more charges after a year. To me, price per battery matters more as long as the battery is of good quality.
Additionally, I have seen a very popular review about Japanese vs Chinese made battery on youtube, which famously claimed that Japanese made batteries are almost always better. This is probably one of the reasons behind all the concerns about country of origin. However, I feel that there are substantial non-scientific elements in these reviews. For one, some reviews based their conclusions primarily on the "claimed" mAh ratings by the manufacturer. A brand with 95% "real" mAh of the claimed mAh was rated better than another brand with 85% of that number. But what really matters to me is the "real" mAh per dollar cost. The fact that many Chinese brands are of lower price than Japanese brands was not considered in the review. Second, I have not seen a single review that has measured the same brand of batteries with enough repetition to show error bars and statistical significance. In the scientific world, comparing data without error bars and statistical evaluation is almost meaningless.
I do not want to start a debate about country of origin and battery quality--just my few cents.
It seems to be a smarter move to get batteries through IKEA as they are always made in Japan.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank NickT1620
It seems to be a smarter move to get batteries through IKEA as they are always made in Japan.
There are 1.5v Li AA rechargeable batteries good for august.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Personally, I have had about 50 of these batteries from previous purchases, and they work great for me. Never had an issue. Of course, I care more about being green and replacing all toy batteries with rechargeable, rather than whether one brand of battery can hold 5% more charges after a year. To me, price per battery matters more as long as the battery is of good quality.
Additionally, I have seen a very popular review about Japanese vs Chinese made battery on youtube, which famously claimed that Japanese made batteries are almost always better. This is probably one of the reasons behind all the concerns about country of origin. However, I feel that there are substantial non-scientific elements in these reviews. For one, some reviews based their conclusions primarily on the "claimed" mAh ratings by the manufacturer. A brand with 95% "real" mAh of the claimed mAh was rated better than another brand with 85% of that number. But what really matters to me is the "real" mAh per dollar cost. The fact that many Chinese brands are of lower price than Japanese brands was not considered in the review. Second, I have not seen a single review that has measured the same brand of batteries with enough repetition to show error bars and statistical significance. In the scientific world, comparing data without error bars and statistical evaluation is almost meaningless.
I do not want to start a debate about country of origin and battery quality--just my few cents.