Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sorry, this deal has expired.
Get notified of deals like this in the future.
Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage
27" LG 27GN880-B UltraGear QHD Nano IPS 1ms 144Hz HDR Monitor w/ Ergo Stand Expired
$359
$599.99
or less w/ SD Cashback + Free S/H
BuyDig has 27" LG 27GN880-B UltraGear QHD Nano IPS 1ms 144Hz HDR Monitor w/ Ergo Stand on sale for $359 w/ promo code VEG25 applied in cart. Slickdeals Cashback is available for this store (PC extension required, before checkout). Shipping is free.
Thanks to Slickdeals Deal Editor iconian for posting this deal.
Deal Instructions:
Thanks to Slickdeals Deal Editor iconian for posting this deal.
Deal Instructions:
- Visit product page for 27" LG 27GN880-B UltraGear QHD Nano IPS 1ms 144Hz HDR Monitor
- Add to cart
- In cart, apply promo code VEG25
- Total will be $496.99 - $137.99 promo code = $359 + free shipping
- Screen Size: 27"
- Resolution: 2560x1440
- Refresh Rate: 144Hz
- Response Time: 1ms (GtG at Faster)
- Display Type: IPS w/ HDR10
- Color Gamut (Typ.): DCI-P3 98% (CIE1976)
- G-SYNC Compatible + AMD FreeSync
- Ergo stand can Extend/Retract/Swivel/Height/Pivot/Tilt
Original Post
Written by
Edited July 21, 2021
at 09:32 AM
in
Monitors
(6)
Get BuyDig Coupons
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Check Out Similar Monitors Deals
View AllPrice Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: LG 27GN880-B 27 UltraGear QHD Nano IPS 1ms 144Hz HDR G-SYNC Gaming Monitor
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
45 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Two months and they should be cheaper new egg is charging way too much
In reality, PS5 only has 8 or 9 games that can fulfill that 4K/120fps potential. Warzone is one of them, but it uses dynamic 4K, so it drops the resolution down when the FPS begins to dip to achieve stable frame rates. This is why the marketing behind 4K/120Hz is misleading. They purposely don't explain to buyers that they will almost never reach the 4K/120fps potential in 99% of the games they purchase, so the HDMI 2.1 feature is kind of moot. I still think modern consoles are a good value though, especially if you've seen what's going on in the graphics card market.
Realistically, almost no setup is running new AAA games at much over 60 fps 4k with reasonable settings. And even if your setup did when it was new, it won't for long.
In reality, PS5 only has 8 or 9 games that can fulfill that 4K/120fps potential. Warzone is one of them, but it uses dynamic 4K, so it drops the resolution down when the FPS begins to dip to achieve stable frame rates. This is why the marketing behind 4K/120Hz is misleading. They purposely don't explain to buyers that they will almost never reach the 4K/120fps potential in 99% of the games they purchase, so the HDMI 2.1 feature is kind of moot. I still think modern consoles are a good value though, especially if you've seen what's going on in the graphics card market.
That's all well and good if you're a PC gamer only. But he was talking about PS5. While it's true not many games support 4K/120, and you're not likely to get both max resolution and frame rate simultaneously, the bigger issue is that PS5 doesn't support anything between 1080P and 4K. So it's still better to get 4K if you're primarily worried about PS5.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
100hz or 100fps?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
People have been making claims about 4K gaming being realistic for the masses "in another generation or two" for about 8 years now. Checker-boarding, DLSS/FSR, and other upscaling techniques (which scale well past 4K, by the way) are not "stop gaps," they're tech used to get more performance with little to no visual trade off and the desire for that isn't going to vanish past 4K. Besides, since most people can't tell a difference between native and DLSS images, the only people who really care if that tech is being used are the spec junkies who value numbers over actual experiences.