Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
expiredShane1234 posted Aug 23, 2021 01:11 PM
expiredShane1234 posted Aug 23, 2021 01:11 PM

Western Digital 4TB WD Red NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD - $85 + Free shipping w/ Prime $84.99

$85

Amazon
18 Comments 11,649 Views
Visit Amazon
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Amazon.com has Western Digital 4TB WD Red NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD for $84.99 with free Prime shipping.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083XVY99B/


https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083XVY99B/
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Amazon.com has Western Digital 4TB WD Red NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD for $84.99 with free Prime shipping.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083XVY99B/


https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B083XVY99B/

Community Voting

Deal Score
+9
Good Deal
Visit Amazon

Price Intelligence

Model: Western Digital Red WD40EFAX 4 TB Hard Drive - 3.5" Internal - SATA (SATA/600) - Storage System Device Supported - 5400rpm - 180 TB TBW - 3 Year Warra

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 8/5/2025, 12:29 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$141.94

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

18 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 23, 2021 03:34 PM
2,729 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
Aug 23, 2021 03:34 PM
b.armsAug 23, 2021 03:34 PM
2,729 Posts
For those wondering, this is SMR
Aug 23, 2021 07:13 PM
874 Posts
Joined May 2019
Aug 23, 2021 07:13 PM
oreganotrailAug 23, 2021 07:13 PM
874 Posts
Quote from b.arms :
For those wondering, this is SMR
Does that mean I get another 2 dollars for that class action if I buy it and become outraged?
1
Aug 23, 2021 07:14 PM
19 Posts
Joined Jun 2013
Aug 23, 2021 07:14 PM
jonnfb516Aug 23, 2021 07:14 PM
19 Posts
Quote from b.arms :
For those wondering, this is SMR
Please remind me, SMR > OR < CMR
Aug 23, 2021 07:25 PM
424 Posts
Joined May 2017
Aug 23, 2021 07:25 PM
wdslkdAug 23, 2021 07:25 PM
424 Posts
Quote from jonnfb516 :
Please remind me, SMR > OR < CMR
Right, I had to google myself, because I can never remember. So, the conventional wisdom is CMR better than SMR.

These are "WD Red" and are SMR.
The "WD Red Plus" are the better and CMR.
Aug 23, 2021 07:26 PM
19 Posts
Joined Jun 2013
Aug 23, 2021 07:26 PM
jonnfb516Aug 23, 2021 07:26 PM
19 Posts
Quote from wdslkd :
Right, I had to google myself, because I can never remember. So, the conventional wisdom is CMR better than SMR.

These are "WD Red" and are SMR.
The "WD Red Plus" are the better and CMR.
You rock, was actually about to edit. Thank you.
Aug 23, 2021 09:21 PM
17 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Aug 23, 2021 09:21 PM
4th.on.3rdAug 23, 2021 09:21 PM
17 Posts
Quote from wdslkd :
Right, I had to google myself, because I can never remember. So, the conventional wisdom is CMR better than SMR.

These are "WD Red" and are SMR.
The "WD Red Plus" are the better and CMR.
WD has really muddied the waters, s it's no longer so straightforward. There are older WD Red (the newer are now named 'Plus') that are CMR, like the EFRX series. There are also WD Blue (my gotos for ZFS NAS) that are CMR, like the EZRZ and EZAZ series.
Aug 23, 2021 09:32 PM
3,952 Posts
Joined Sep 2007
Aug 23, 2021 09:32 PM
InterfaceAug 23, 2021 09:32 PM
3,952 Posts
Consumer grade mechanical hard drives by Seagate and Western Digital should be avoided if you care about your data. Get an enterprise hard drive filled with helium, it will last you a very long time.

https://www.amazon.com/HGST-Ultra...0856WZT3B/

HGST Ultrastar 7K4000 4TB 64MB Cache 7200RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5inch Internal Hard Drive (for NAS, Desktop PC/Mac, Surveillance Storage, CCTV DVR) - 5 Year Warranty (Renewed)
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 24, 2021 02:53 AM
17 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Aug 24, 2021 02:53 AM
4th.on.3rdAug 24, 2021 02:53 AM
17 Posts
Quote from Interface :
Consumer grade mechanical hard drives by Seagate and Western Digital should be avoided if you care about your data. Get an enterprise hard drive filled with helium, it will last you a very long time.

https://www.amazon.com/HGST-Ultra...0856WZT3B/

HGST Ultrastar 7K4000 4TB 64MB Cache 7200RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5inch Internal Hard Drive (for NAS, Desktop PC/Mac, Surveillance Storage, CCTV DVR) - 5 Year Warranty (Renewed)
That's one way to go if you like to take chances on "renewed" HDs, and you don't care about noise. I've been there already. I got four, and each of them had 5 years on them, and all four failed within a month. BTW, all from the same source as you linked to (but through Newegg), and the guy refunded the money, no questions asked. At least that, but I'm not going to do that again.

On the other hand:

Code:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Western Digital Blue Device Model: WDC WD30EZRZ-00WN9B0
Serial Number: xxxxxxx
Device Id: 5 0014ee 20cab49f7
Firmware Version: 80.00A80
User Capacity: 3,000,592,982,016 bytes [3.00 TB]
Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical
Rotation Rate: 5400 rpm
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: ACS-2 (minor revision not indicated)
SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is: Mon Aug 23 19:06:49 2021 PDT
Code:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate     0x002f   200   200   051    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  3 Spin_Up_Time            0x0027   172   172   021    Pre-fail  Always       -       8358
  4 Start_Stop_Count        0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       171
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   200   200   140    Pre-fail  Always       -       0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate         0x002e   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0032   043   043   000    Old_age   Always       -       41689
 10 Spin_Retry_Count        0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       153
192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       60
193 Load_Cycle_Count        0x0032   077   077   000    Old_age   Always       -       370489
194 Temperature_Celsius     0x0022   116   103   000    Old_age   Always       -       36
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0030   200   200   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count    0x0032   200   200   000    Old_age   Always       -       0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x0008   200   200   000    Old_age   Offline      -       0
ZFS file system, ECC system memory, light use, ~4.5 years and still going strong. I have yet to have one fail on me, though I always keep a spare and replace when I'm starting to get errors. I've been doing it for years (decades really). Just got two more 4TB EZAX @ $75 ea.
Last edited by 4th.on.3rd August 23, 2021 at 07:58 PM.
Aug 24, 2021 02:35 PM
2,729 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
Aug 24, 2021 02:35 PM
b.armsAug 24, 2021 02:35 PM
2,729 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank b.arms

Quote from jonnfb516 :
Please remind me, SMR > OR < CMR
C stands for "Conventional"
S stands for "Shingled"
MR means "Magnetic Recording"

In most (arguably all) applications, CMR is best.
Shingled (SMR) has the data overlapping, like a shingle. While this doesn't really affect reading the data, writing new data means all of the overlapping data has to be moved out of the way first. and all of the overlapping data on top of that has to be moved as well... and so on...

It's fine for archival purposes, write once and store as a backup, etc... but for everyday use, SMR is terrible. In a NAS it's even worse, particularly one that uses ZFS. It can make a RAID array that would usually take 12 hours or so to rebuild with a CMR drive take several weeks on an SMR drive. That is what made these drives so maddening. SMR is the worst performing drive you could put in a modern NAS, yet that's what WD labelled them for without telling anyone they did it.
1
Aug 24, 2021 02:43 PM
19 Posts
Joined Jun 2013
Aug 24, 2021 02:43 PM
jonnfb516Aug 24, 2021 02:43 PM
19 Posts
Quote from b.arms :
C stands for "Conventional"
S stands for "Shingled"
MR means "Magnetic Recording"

In most (arguably all) applications, CMR is best.
Shingled (SMR) has the data overlapping, like a shingle. While this doesn't really affect reading the data, writing new data means all of the overlapping data has to be moved out of the way first. and all of the overlapping data on top of that has to be moved as well... and so on...

It's fine for archival purposes, write once and store as a backup, etc... but for everyday use, SMR is terrible. In a NAS it's even worse, particularly one that uses ZFS. It can make a RAID array that would usually take 12 hours or so to rebuild with a CMR drive take several weeks on an SMR drive. That is what made these drives so maddening. SMR is the worst performing drive you could put in a modern NAS, yet that's what WD labelled them for without telling anyone they did it.
Thank you for the explanation. Never knew that's how it worked or that they did it without telling anyone.

If I am putting some photos on a backup that I will probably not touch again for awhile, this will probably be fine, correct? Otherwise get the "plus".
Aug 24, 2021 03:01 PM
2,729 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
Aug 24, 2021 03:01 PM
b.armsAug 24, 2021 03:01 PM
2,729 Posts
Quote from jonnfb516 :
Thank you for the explanation. Never knew that's how it worked or that they did it without telling anyone.

If I am putting some photos on a backup that I will probably not touch again for awhile, this will probably be fine, correct? Otherwise get the "plus".
Personally, I just stay away from SMR altogether. I tend to swap my drives around and repurpose them though.

As far as I know, there's no benefit to the end user to use SMR, it only benefits the manufacturer because they can squeeze about 30% more data on to each platter.

I would use those reconditioned 4TB Ultrastars that someone linked in this thread long before buying SMR drives. That's just a personal preference I suppose, but HGST makes insanely reliable drives, especially their enterprise line. Sucks that WD bought them.

Off Topic Nostalgia Time:
It's funny that back in the day, Hitachi bought IBM's Hard Drive division, but didn't change the model names at all. Anyone who knew anything about computers knew that IBM's consumer drives "DeskStar" had been referred to as "DeathStar" for several years at that point due to their horrible reliability. I learned in the mid 2000's that Hitachi "DeskStars" were some of the most reliable drives you could get, yet they could often be found cheap because people still had that model name association.

After the flood in Thailand that ground WD to a crawl and caused the market to get desperate, everyone else soon learned Hitachi drives were awesome too. and the "Deathstar" moniker was all but forgotten.
Aug 24, 2021 03:34 PM
2,729 Posts
Joined Jul 2014
Aug 24, 2021 03:34 PM
b.armsAug 24, 2021 03:34 PM
2,729 Posts
Quote from 4th.on.3rd :
That's one way to go if you like to take chances on "renewed" HDs, and you don't care about noise. I've been there already. I got four, and each of them had 5 years on them, and all four failed within a month. BTW, all from the same source as you linked to (but through Newegg), and the guy refunded the money, no questions asked. At least that, but I'm not going to do that again.

ZFS file system, ECC system memory, light use, ~4.5 years and still going strong. I have yet to have one fail on me, though I always keep a spare and replace when I'm starting to get errors. I've been doing it for years (decades really). Just got two more 4TB EZAX @ $75 ea.
I've had hit-or-miss luck with second-hand drives, but I always run a full battery of tests using Seatools before putting data on any newly purchased HDD I get. The faulty drives have always shown themselves during the long generic test or sooner, and I'll send the drive back as "DOA".

That goes for new drives as well, and I've found my share of soon-to-be-failing drives by just letting those long tests run. Send back as DOA within the 30-day return period, never have to deal with the manufacturers or lose any data.
Aug 25, 2021 12:29 AM
30 Posts
Joined Nov 2012
Aug 25, 2021 12:29 AM
MikeThorAug 25, 2021 12:29 AM
30 Posts
Quote from Interface :
Consumer grade mechanical hard drives by Seagate and Western Digital should be avoided if you care about your data. Get an enterprise hard drive filled with helium, it will last you a very long time.

https://www.amazon.com/HGST-Ultra...0856WZT3B/

HGST Ultrastar 7K4000 4TB 64MB Cache 7200RPM SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5inch Internal Hard Drive (for NAS, Desktop PC/Mac, Surveillance Storage, CCTV DVR) - 5 Year Warranty (Renewed)
I had one take a shit on me after 4 years. I was running it in RAID 1 though because it was sentimental.
Aug 25, 2021 06:23 AM
3,952 Posts
Joined Sep 2007
Aug 25, 2021 06:23 AM
InterfaceAug 25, 2021 06:23 AM
3,952 Posts
Quote from MikeThor :
I had one take a shit on me after 4 years. I was running it in RAID 1 though because it was sentimental.
So you are complaining after 4-years, your internal hard drive quit on you. Most of the crap sold to consumers doesn't even last that long.
1

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 25, 2021 06:53 PM
17 Posts
Joined Jun 2014
Aug 25, 2021 06:53 PM
4th.on.3rdAug 25, 2021 06:53 PM
17 Posts
Quote from Interface :
... Most of the crap sold to consumers doesn't even last that long.
Your hard-and-fast rule (more like a blanket conviction with a dose of fear mongering) is not incorrect per se, and yet manages to be wrong for a whole gamut of use cases.

In a home environment HDs are most of the time just spinning idle. In such case, consumer-type HDs, like the WD Blue line, are parfectly fine (as the SMART data I posted shows).

On the other hand, if you are in a commercial environment where HDs are pushed to their mechanical/thermal/electrical limits most of the time, then you may(*) need, and can justify their price, drives capable of delivering 100s of TBs over their lifetime, like the mentioned HGST made ones.

To each his/her own and according to their needs (ha!), so oftentimes the "crap" drives, as you call them, are the most suitable solution.

(*) Spend some time looking through Backblaze reliability reporting.
Last edited by 4th.on.3rd August 25, 2021 at 11:56 AM.

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All