Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $87.99 |
Product Name: | TP-Link WiFi 6 AX3000 VPN Router – 802.11ax Wireless Router, Gigabit, Dual Band Internet Router, MU-MIMO, OneMesh Compatible (Archer AX55) |
Manufacturer: | TP-Link |
Model Number: | Archer AX55 |
Product SKU: | B09G5W9R6R |
UPC: | 840030703041 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
54 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I would be willing to pay from $120-$150 for a much better router; is there anything in that price range that's worth the extra cost?
https://www.costco.com/tp-link-tr...97042.html
https://slickdeals.net/f/15857719-tp-link-tri-band-7-stream-ax3200-wi-fi-6-wireless-router-119-99?src=SiteSear
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank BeefSup
https://www.costco.com/tp-link-tr...97042.html
https://slickdeals.net/f/15857719-tp-link-tri-band-7-stream-ax3200-wi-fi-6-wireless-router-119-99?src=SiteSear
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
First off course one is AX1800 while the other is AX3000 which means more overall throughput.
Design wise while both get great range per puck the X60 has 4 internal antennas compared to the X20 which only has 2 which means better signal stronger connections.
Then you have X60 with 6 streams compared to the X20 with 4 streams which becomes important if your adding a lot of devices on the network who need to talk a lot. Or are centered in certain parts of the house.
Real world performance from the tests I saw, you will be getting around 550-600Mbps from the X20 while the X60 will push around 700Mbps on the top end to a compatible client.
Hope that helped you, like I said if you need it now the X20 is not bad, but the X60 shines a lot brighter same goes for the X55 (watered down version of the X60) which is very similar to the X20.
Do you think this will suffice my need?
Thanks
First off course one is AX1800 while the other is AX3000 which means more overall throughput.
Design wise while both get great range per puck the X60 has 4 internal antennas compared to the X20 which only has 2 which means better signal stronger connections.
Then you have X60 with 6 streams compared to the X20 with 4 streams which becomes important if your adding a lot of devices on the network who need to talk a lot. Or are centered in certain parts of the house.
Real world performance from the tests I saw, you will be getting around 550-600Mbps from the X20 while the X60 will push around 700Mbps on the top end to a compatible client.
Hope that helped you, like I said if you need it now the X20 is not bad, but the X60 shines a lot brighter same goes for the X55 (watered down version of the X60) which is very similar to the X20.
On the side note, how is eero6 in comparison to X20? I am planning on wiring the x20 to ethernet so eero6 does not look like a good choice.
On the side note, how is eero6 in comparison to X20? I am planning on wiring the x20 to ethernet so eero6 does not look like a good choice.
Compared to the standard Eero 6 this is superior as Eero 6 (300ish Mbps) and even the eero 6 Pro have problems breaking past 500Mbps. The latest Eero 6E seems to be even slower and more unreliable so a complete pass till they work out the bugs. Eero was never meant for speed but reliability but in this case the X20 is just as reliable but also performs better.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.