Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
FWIW, I bought these two weeks ago when it was first advertised here, and I saw this comment by brucknerfan after the fact and got nervous. However, after three runs in these shoes, I think they're great for the price you're paying. I needed a shoe refresh going into a winter training season for Boston next year. I usually run my Brooks shoes into the 1000-1300 mile range before reloading, and these felt so light and fast that I was averaging 20 sec/mile faster for each run. So if you need a light shoe to crank out miles in, I recommend these!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank brucknerfan
10-31-2023 at 09:15 PM.
Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
FWIW, I bought these two weeks ago when it was first advertised here, and I saw this comment by brucknerfan after the fact and got nervous. However, after three runs in these shoes, I think they're great for the price you're paying. I needed a shoe refresh going into a winter training season for Boston next year. I usually run my Brooks shoes into the 1000-1300 mile range before reloading, and these felt so light and fast that I was averaging 20 sec/mile faster for each run. So if you need a light shoe to crank out miles in, I recommend these!
Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
This shoe gets a score of 89 (Great!) at RunRepeat and they say: "Exceptionally bouncy DNA Flash midsole" and "With its astonishingly light build and bouncy midsole that brings a spring to every step, the Brooks Hyperion Max truly offers an exceptional running experience that's good for all four seasons."
I'm not super experienced with Brooks personally as they're typically too narrow for me, but I see a lot of positive feedback from other runners about these. The main downside being the MSRP. If these weren't on the narrow side I'd pick up a pair for my rotation at this price point.
My biggest problem with this shoe is the tongue slides. It's thin and has no friction type of backing to keep it in place when wearing socks. The comfort is there, but I've tried about a half dozen ways to lace them and the tongue eventually ends up sliding to the outside part of the shoe. I have had the same problem with Hyperion Tempos so I think this is an issue with the Hyperion line in general. I don't have these issues with Ghosts or Adrenalines.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank brucknerfan
11-01-2023 at 04:47 AM.
Quote
from Cheesecycle
:
This shoe gets a score of 89 (Great!) at RunRepeat and they say: "Exceptionally bouncy DNA Flash midsole" and "With its astonishingly light build and bouncy midsole that brings a spring to every step, the Brooks Hyperion Max truly offers an exceptional running experience that's good for all four seasons."
I'm not super experienced with Brooks personally as they're typically too narrow for me, but I see a lot of positive feedback from other runners about these. The main downside being the MSRP. If these weren't on the narrow side I'd pick up a pair for my rotation at this price point.
Reread that quote from Runrepeat. It's a regurgitation of Brooks marketing points, not an impartial assessment of the shoe.
There's two side to Runrepeat. They do objective lab style testing that is used to create expanded specs for select shoes. But then there's the scoring system that is apparently based on subjective views from third parties.
I take Runrepeat's scoring with a grain of salt. The numbers are based on a partially arbitrary scoring system. They compile reviews on each shoe from socalled "pro" reviewers, people who make video shoe reviews (e.g. Ginger Runner) or operate websites (e.g. Believe in the Run). All of these sources are compromised by financial conflicts of interests. Basically they get free s*** in exchange for reviewing shoes and other running products. The website operators also earn through affiliate retail links and ad revenue from running brands. So these reviewers have an incentive to play up the positives and minimize the negatives of any shoe product. These socalled pro reviewers should be viewed as contract marketers for the shoe brands that operate on a pro quid quo basis, a favor for a favor.
Even more problematic is that in many cases Runrepeat creates own numerical scores for pro reviews by that don't provide a numerical score for a shoe. Some review sites use a education style grading system (e.g. Doctors of Running) of A, B, C, ect. The operators of Runrepeat then interpret those letter grades and assign them numerical scores that arbitrarily decided on.
Runrepeat also compiles user reviews from various retail websites. This poses another problem. Those reviews are often duplicated. Most retail store websites now commingle reviews from brand operated websites (e.g. brooksrunning.com) with reviews from their own customers. If you navigate to the review section on the Dick's page for the Hyperion Max there are 113 reviews. Underneath most of those reviews is a notice that reads "Originally posted on brooksrunning.com". That indicates that the review was copied from brooksrunning.com and duplicated on the Dick's webpage.
Runrepeat has some value in so far as listing specs, comparing specs between shoe models, and checking retail prices. Occasionally, they also cut and dissect shoes which can reveal some interesting details on a shoe's construction. When they perform in depth tests on a shoe's breathability and midsole durometer that can be helpful for making a purchase a decision. But their commentary is largely boiler plate.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank boosterjm
11-01-2023 at 05:22 AM.
Stick to traditional Brooks line like Adrenaline, Ghost etc for daily training. They are okay imo but for everything else brooks has fallen far behind in running
Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
I like em, I'm getting em
Let us know when you find more Joe's new balance deals. I need the Fuel cells
Reread that quote from Runrepeat. It's a regurgitation of Brooks marketing points, not an impartial assessment of the shoe.
There's two side to Runrepeat. They do objective lab style testing that is used to create expanded specs for select shoes. But then there's the scoring system that is apparently based on subjective views from third parties.
I take Runrepeat's scoring with a grain of salt. The numbers are based on a partially arbitrary scoring system. They compile reviews on each shoe from socalled "pro" reviewers, people who make video shoe reviews (e.g. Ginger Runner) or operate websites (e.g. Believe in the Run). All of these sources are compromised by financial conflicts of interests. Basically they get free s*** in exchange for reviewing shoes and other running products. The website operators also earn through affiliate retail links and ad revenue from running brands. So these reviewers have an incentive to play up the positives and minimize the negatives of any shoe product. These socalled pro reviewers should be viewed as contract marketers for the shoe brands that operate on a pro quid quo basis, a favor for a favor.
Even more problematic is that in many cases Runrepeat creates own numerical scores for pro reviews by that don't provide a numerical score for a shoe. Some review sites use a education style grading system (e.g. Doctors of Running) of A, B, C, ect. The operators of Runrepeat then interpret those letter grades and assign them numerical scores that arbitrarily decided on.
Runrepeat also compiles user reviews from various retail websites. This poses another problem. Those reviews are often duplicated. Most retail store websites now commingle reviews from brand operated websites (e.g. brooksrunning.com) with reviews from their own customers. If you navigate to the review section on the Dick's page for the Hyperion Max there are 113 reviews. Underneath most of those reviews is a notice that reads "Originally posted on brooksrunning.com". That indicates that the review was copied from brooksrunning.com and duplicated on the Dick's webpage.
Runrepeat has some value in so far as listing specs, comparing specs between shoe models, and checking retail prices. Occasionally, they also cut and dissect shoes which can reveal some interesting details on a shoe's construction. When they perform in depth tests on a shoe's breathability and midsole durometer that can be helpful for making a purchase a decision. But their commentary is largely boiler plate.
How about Doctors of Running? A little more critical than run repeat perhaps, but overall a good review (B, B/B+, A-).
Definitely not supporting the idea that these are "widely panned by runners."
It's just another website publishes reviews to generate revenue. I think a couple of the guys on that site are physical therapists, not actual doctors.
I think there's more insight to be had by sifting through the discussions on the r/RunningShoeGeeks sub. When the Hyperion Max was first announced there was enthusiasm on that forum. When people finally got their hands on the shoes the vibe changed to "meh".
For people that want a firm snappy EVA shoe, the Asics Gel Noosa Tri is a good option. That's a better and more popular shoe than the Hyperion Max.
It's just another website publishes reviews to generate revenue. I think a couple of the guys on that site are physical therapists, not actual doctors.
I think there's more insight to be had by sifting through the discussions on the r/RunningShoeGeeks sub. When the Hyperion Max was first announced there was enthusiasm on that forum. When people finally got their hands on the shoes the vibe changed to "meh".
For people that want a firm snappy EVA shoe, the Asics Gel Noosa Tri is a good option. That's a better and more popular shoe than the Hyperion Max.
From what I've seen on RunningShoeGeeks, the "meh" turned much more positive after break in periods.
While there are many upsides, this is is an inherent flaw with subreddit reviews for new products, especially those that require a break in period.
Idk, I don't have any skin in this game. Never tried this shoe and personally don't care for Brooks much. But your initial post was significantly more negative than the experiences I've seen in my running communities (including r/runningshoegeeks).
edit: Though to be fair, hype like that often leads to excessive disappointment initially which then rebounds to something more positive as the product is increasingly seen for what it is instead of being compared to the hype.
Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
These are a reasonable training shoe. Fuel rebel v3 is not as good, unless you like running on raw bread dough. Forefoot doesn't have good cushion and the mid sole bounce back feels like you're sinking in quicksand
Dicks keeps slashing the price on thisshoe because no one wants it. If you're not in the know this shoe has been widely panned by runners. It's hardly spoken of anymore on r/RunningShoeGeeks because it was bombed so bad when it came out last year.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
Thanks for the information! Hoka also uses EVA foam in a lot of their shoes, right? Would it be fair to say they are "stuck in the Stone age" with Brooks? People seem to like the Hoka Clifton 9 for example - but I believe they just use an EVA based foam. Wondering where they rank.
33 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank brucknerfan
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
Full review here: https://runrepeat.com/brooks-hyperion-max
I'm not super experienced with Brooks personally as they're typically too narrow for me, but I see a lot of positive feedback from other runners about these. The main downside being the MSRP. If these weren't on the narrow side I'd pick up a pair for my rotation at this price point.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank brucknerfan
Full review here: https://runrepeat.com/brooks-hyperion-max
I'm not super experienced with Brooks personally as they're typically too narrow for me, but I see a lot of positive feedback from other runners about these. The main downside being the MSRP. If these weren't on the narrow side I'd pick up a pair for my rotation at this price point.
Reread that quote from Runrepeat. It's a regurgitation of Brooks marketing points, not an impartial assessment of the shoe.
There's two side to Runrepeat. They do objective lab style testing that is used to create expanded specs for select shoes. But then there's the scoring system that is apparently based on subjective views from third parties.
I take Runrepeat's scoring with a grain of salt. The numbers are based on a partially arbitrary scoring system. They compile reviews on each shoe from socalled "pro" reviewers, people who make video shoe reviews (e.g. Ginger Runner) or operate websites (e.g. Believe in the Run). All of these sources are compromised by financial conflicts of interests. Basically they get free s*** in exchange for reviewing shoes and other running products. The website operators also earn through affiliate retail links and ad revenue from running brands. So these reviewers have an incentive to play up the positives and minimize the negatives of any shoe product. These socalled pro reviewers should be viewed as contract marketers for the shoe brands that operate on a pro quid quo basis, a favor for a favor.
Even more problematic is that in many cases Runrepeat creates own numerical scores for pro reviews by that don't provide a numerical score for a shoe. Some review sites use a education style grading system (e.g. Doctors of Running) of A, B, C, ect. The operators of Runrepeat then interpret those letter grades and assign them numerical scores that arbitrarily decided on.
Runrepeat also compiles user reviews from various retail websites. This poses another problem. Those reviews are often duplicated. Most retail store websites now commingle reviews from brand operated websites (e.g. brooksrunning.com) with reviews from their own customers. If you navigate to the review section on the Dick's page for the Hyperion Max there are 113 reviews. Underneath most of those reviews is a notice that reads "Originally posted on brooksrunning.com". That indicates that the review was copied from brooksrunning.com and duplicated on the Dick's webpage.
Runrepeat has some value in so far as listing specs, comparing specs between shoe models, and checking retail prices. Occasionally, they also cut and dissect shoes which can reveal some interesting details on a shoe's construction. When they perform in depth tests on a shoe's breathability and midsole durometer that can be helpful for making a purchase a decision. But their commentary is largely boiler plate.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank boosterjm
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
I like em, I'm getting em
Let us know when you find more Joe's new balance deals. I need the Fuel cells
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
There's two side to Runrepeat. They do objective lab style testing that is used to create expanded specs for select shoes. But then there's the scoring system that is apparently based on subjective views from third parties.
I take Runrepeat's scoring with a grain of salt. The numbers are based on a partially arbitrary scoring system. They compile reviews on each shoe from socalled "pro" reviewers, people who make video shoe reviews (e.g. Ginger Runner) or operate websites (e.g. Believe in the Run). All of these sources are compromised by financial conflicts of interests. Basically they get free s*** in exchange for reviewing shoes and other running products. The website operators also earn through affiliate retail links and ad revenue from running brands. So these reviewers have an incentive to play up the positives and minimize the negatives of any shoe product. These socalled pro reviewers should be viewed as contract marketers for the shoe brands that operate on a pro quid quo basis, a favor for a favor.
Even more problematic is that in many cases Runrepeat creates own numerical scores for pro reviews by that don't provide a numerical score for a shoe. Some review sites use a education style grading system (e.g. Doctors of Running) of A, B, C, ect. The operators of Runrepeat then interpret those letter grades and assign them numerical scores that arbitrarily decided on.
Runrepeat also compiles user reviews from various retail websites. This poses another problem. Those reviews are often duplicated. Most retail store websites now commingle reviews from brand operated websites (e.g. brooksrunning.com) with reviews from their own customers. If you navigate to the review section on the Dick's page for the Hyperion Max there are 113 reviews. Underneath most of those reviews is a notice that reads "Originally posted on brooksrunning.com". That indicates that the review was copied from brooksrunning.com and duplicated on the Dick's webpage.
Runrepeat has some value in so far as listing specs, comparing specs between shoe models, and checking retail prices. Occasionally, they also cut and dissect shoes which can reveal some interesting details on a shoe's construction. When they perform in depth tests on a shoe's breathability and midsole durometer that can be helpful for making a purchase a decision. But their commentary is largely boiler plate.
How about Doctors of Running? A little more critical than run repeat perhaps, but overall a good review (B, B/B+, A-).
https://www.doctorsofru
Definitely not supporting the idea that these are "widely panned by runners."
https://www.doctorsofru
Definitely not supporting the idea that these are "widely panned by runners."
It's just another website publishes reviews to generate revenue. I think a couple of the guys on that site are physical therapists, not actual doctors.
I think there's more insight to be had by sifting through the discussions on the r/RunningShoeGeeks sub. When the Hyperion Max was first announced there was enthusiasm on that forum. When people finally got their hands on the shoes the vibe changed to "meh".
For people that want a firm snappy EVA shoe, the Asics Gel Noosa Tri is a good option. That's a better and more popular shoe than the Hyperion Max.
I think there's more insight to be had by sifting through the discussions on the r/RunningShoeGeeks sub. When the Hyperion Max was first announced there was enthusiasm on that forum. When people finally got their hands on the shoes the vibe changed to "meh".
For people that want a firm snappy EVA shoe, the Asics Gel Noosa Tri is a good option. That's a better and more popular shoe than the Hyperion Max.
From what I've seen on RunningShoeGeeks, the "meh" turned much more positive after break in periods.
While there are many upsides, this is is an inherent flaw with subreddit reviews for new products, especially those that require a break in period.
Idk, I don't have any skin in this game. Never tried this shoe and personally don't care for Brooks much. But your initial post was significantly more negative than the experiences I've seen in my running communities (including r/runningshoegeeks).
edit: Though to be fair, hype like that often leads to excessive disappointment initially which then rebounds to something more positive as the product is increasingly seen for what it is instead of being compared to the hype.
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.
These are a reasonable training shoe. Fuel rebel v3 is not as good, unless you like running on raw bread dough. Forefoot doesn't have good cushion and the mid sole bounce back feels like you're sinking in quicksand
The Hyperion Max is a firm shoe with your basic generic nitrogen infused EVA midsole. There's no plate and no super foam. Despite this the brilliant people at Brooks, which is owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, decided to price this Sketchers knockoff at $170. Quite hilarious.
Brooks doesn't seem to have a good grasp at what's going on in run specialty. They're putting out shoes that use technology from 2014 and slapping 2023 price tags on them. In today's market $170 will buy you a Saucony Endorphin Speed 3, a high performance daily trainer that uses licensed Pebax foam from Arkema, a French based chemicals conglomerate. The company's Pebax is a type of TPE based foam known as PEBA. Not only does Saucony use Pebax but Nike too. The shoes that always take the podium at the world's major Marathons are always TPE based.
While Nike, Adidas, and Saucony are out here slaying with TPE based foams Brooks continues to live in the Stone age.
At this price point you should keep your eye out for a New Balance Fuelcell Rebel v3. They discount down to $70 but can be had for $50 when coupons are applicable at Joe's New Balance but the inventory has dried up. Deals on select color ways should materialize by end of year as part of the holiday shopping season. The Rebel v3 uses a quasi super foam. While it might not be on par with TPE it's a noticable step up from EVA. The Rebel is light on foot, well ventilated, and the foam is squishy and springy.