Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Product Name: | LG UltraGear 31.5" 4K HDR 160 Hz Gaming Monitor |
Product Description: | 31.5" 16:9 IPS Panel HDMI | DisplayPort 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 160 Hz FreeSync Premium | G-Sync Compatible |
Product SKU: | 1692614 |
UPC: | 195174035115 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
20 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank WayneZ
This is why I'm waiting on the new qd oled 4k monitors releasing soon.
https://a.co/d/epItuCU
Typical: 85.0 W
Maximum: 200.0 W
Just notice ASUS ROG Strix 32" HDMI 2.1 DSC Gaming Monitor (XG32UQ) - 4K UHD (3840 x 2160), Fast IPS, 160Hz, 1ms, typical use <51W.
Typical: 85.0 W
Maximum: 200.0 W
Just notice ASUS ROG Strix 32" HDMI 2.1 DSC Gaming Monitor (XG32UQ) - 4K UHD (3840 x 2160), Fast IPS, 160Hz, 1ms, typical use <51W.
Mini led panels are known to be pigs. Is the ROG one mini-led?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Mini led is just the backlight formst, often combined with an IPS panel. But if you don't remember it probably wasn't in there. It's been a bit of a marketing hook for a while.
I would say Samsung! I haven't tried the G7, but did the G8 and this monitor, and Samsung has a wow factor, while this is just another monitor.
Seems like the main decision is would you prefer VA or IPS panel.
As for something that has similar spec to this LG, if you google about it, people also talk about ASUS ROG Strix 32" XG32UQ - 4K UHD (3840 x 2160), Fast IPS, 160Hz, 1ms .
For places that electricity is very expensive like CA, the typical power consumption for LG 32GQ950-B is 85W while for ASUS XG32UQ, it is 51W.