Dirac has
Dirac Live Bass Control for Denon AVR-X3800H / AVC-X3800H (Digital Licenses) on sale as listed below when you apply discount coupon
30BCDM23 at checkout.
Note: Discount code does not apply to individual 'Room Correction' licenses.
Thanks to Community Member
undisturbed316 for finding this deal.
Available (prices after discount coupon):
- Dirac Live Bass Control Single Subwoofer $228.85
- Dirac Live Bass Control Multi Subwoofer $327.21
- Upgrade an existing Bass Control Single Subwoofer license to Multi Subwoofer $110.82
- Bundle Offer $425.57
- Room Correction Full Bandwidth
- Bass Control Single Subwoofer
- Bundle Offer Multi $523.94
- Room Correction Full Bandwidth
- Bass Control Multi Subwoofer
Features:- Corrects sound gaps and bass decline
- Enhances bass crossover area for smoother reproduction
- Utilizes machine learning for phase co-optimization and supports one or multiple subwoofer (depending on license)
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
If you find evidence that they do give you a no hassle 30 day period to see if it improves your correction beyond what Audyssey MultiEQ X32 + the $20 Audyssey app can do, post the link here to let us know.
For me, if that company isn't willing to let you see if it's worth the money, it's a bad policy. It's not like they have to absorb return shipping costs or resell a discounted used product.
Seems to me you could use bass control as a standalone if you only want it tuning your subs, or go with the live + the multi-sub license if you want it doing everything in a multi-sub system. I've always been happy with XT32 but want to give Dirac a try because there seems at least some agreement that is superior. I missed the BF deals on full-bandwith but though somewhere in the ~$250 - 300 range might be worth a shot. XT32 does handle 2 subs, but not to the complexity that the multi-sub Dirac bass control is described to.
I'm probably oversimplifying this but based on the descriptions, to me it seems:
For a no sub or 1 sub system - Dirac full bandwidth is arguably superior to XT32.
For a 2 sub system - XT32 is arguably superior to Dirac full bandwidth alone. Dirac FB + multi-sub bass control would be superior to XT32.
I'm really struggling with seeing the value of Dirac bass control for a single sub, except as a standalone product where you only want sub calibration. Maybe that's the point?
But for me, the $799 package to cover multi-sub systems... I'm not doing that. I'd rather wait until my next AVR upgrade to see how their market / built-in options pan out. Not saying it isn't worth it, but $800 is far too big of a gamble to me to try it. Maybe if the licenses were transferable at least once or twice maybe, but locked to one AVR? Nah.
All mid-to-high tier receivers will have basic speaker distance correction. So you can take a tape measure and tell the speaker how far each channel is. That will give you a pretty good (not perfect) timing delay. But then, you modern high end receiver also mostly likely has some free flavor of room correction software. That will do 90% of what Dirac does.
Dirac does three things on top of all else: it flattens each speaker's curve, chooses a good crossover, and adjusts the level of each speaker. Of all those, I'd argue adjusting the level is the most valuable feature. In my view, you're paying $100's more to get the level correct out of each speaker on top of what you can do for free. Is that worth it?
I'll go a step further. I did my own calibration on a new Onkyo receiver, listened to it for a few weeks, and then did a Dirac calibration. Dirac nailed all 5 speakers, but completely underpowered the sub no matter how hard I tried. I just don't think I'd pay so much $$ out of pocket on top of the brilliant Marantz / Denon / Pioneer etc capabilities that come free with the receiver.
174 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I'm glad Dirac allows a 30 day trial, cause I'm not certain that a slight upgrade is worth $560+mic cost. But I'm still learning how to use Dirac and rew, so I'll make the most of the trial
I'm glad Dirac allows a 30 day trial, cause I'm not certain that a slight upgrade is worth $560+mic cost. But I'm still learning how to use Dirac and rew, so I'll make the most of the trial
From what I read, you are able to get 90% of Audessey + Minidsp + MSO/REW by just using the basic automated Dirac+ DLBC RC process, and possibly applying a preloaded target curve, such as a Harmon curve for additional bass for low frequencies; which takes all of 1-2 hours vs countless tinkering of multiple different softwares.
I think Dirac + DLBC may be worth it to those who don't want to tinker, as I was impressed after initial Dirac Room auto correction results. But again, to the untrained ear, I think comparable results are achievable with Audessey as well with some extra help from the Audessey editor app
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Anyway, purchased the full bundle with the discount, and setup was mostly a breeze, and now exporting the first filter generated, my issue with Casino is totally ameliorated, and music hits much crisper—i can finally feel the bass.
P.s I use a kef 5.2.2 system (the new sub the exception).
Highly recommend for people perhaps in my boat.
Oops oh yea they can't they don't get the option with that Pioneer 505/Onkyo RZ50! 🤷🏻 ♂️
One thing that article also showed, which I agree from personal experience.
Buying/owning RC(ie DL & DLBC) and properly using it can be an ocean difference apart!!
Oops oh yea they can't they don't get the option with that Pioneer 505/Onkyo RZ50! 🤷🏻 ♂️
One thing that article also showed, which I agree from personal experience.
Buying/owning RC(ie DL & DLBC) and properly using it can be an ocean difference apart!!
From what I read, you are able to get 90% of Audessey + Minidsp + MSO/REW by just using the basic automated Dirac+ DLBC RC process, and possibly applying a preloaded target curve, such as a Harmon curve for additional bass for low frequencies; which takes all of 1-2 hours vs countless tinkering of multiple different softwares.
I think Dirac + DLBC may be worth it to those who don't want to tinker, as I was impressed after initial Dirac Room auto correction results. But again, to the untrained ear, I think comparable results are achievable with Audessey as well with some extra help from the Audessey editor app
I agree a lot with that article and not from reading, from personal experience.
I am very happy with Audyssey but always liked Dirac also.
Back then it was very costly to make the jump.
As Audyssey kept improving(ie editor app,MultiEQ-X,directional sub integration) it was much less reasons to jump especially with the high cost to do so
If I jumped it would be for DLBC.
Now that you can get both for $560, properly implemented DL & especially DLBC is worth it imo!
Again if you read Dirac's description of what DLBC offers/does, that is pretty spot on.
Buying it and implementing it properly can be a gigantic difference though.
Why people rave about DL but then say DLBC is a marginal/no benefit difference is beyond me!
Funny how most people preaching that have had no experience with it!
Based on your opinion it doesn't sound like that's the case either?
So no need to buy either DL or DLBC.
If DLBC is a marginal/not worth it maybe just DL($350/$245 on sale) and have the equivalent with the added benefits of the new Pioneer/Onkyos features?
BTW what did that miniDSP cost you?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Note, I'm using the new RSL speakers (in 5.1.4) with the RSL 12s in a large, open, highly untreated loft.
FWIW, DIRAC doesn't have a dialogue enhancer like Audyssey and I'd miss that.
Maybe it's my old 44 year ears - dunno. I couldn't get behind the DIRAC magic and quenched my FOMO thanks to the 30 day trial.
Leave a Comment