This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
This Philips 50-inch QLED 4K Google TV stands out as a budget 144 Hz big-screen option for casual PC gaming and couch play. The listed HDMI 3 and 4 ports support 4K at 144 Hz with an HDMI 2.1 cable, while HDMI 1 and 2 are limited to 4K at 120 Hz. Brightness is only 350 nits, so HDR looks weak, and the low contrast and likely higher input lag make it less appealing for competitive gaming. It is a solid value if you mainly want SDR gaming and streaming.
Casual PC gamers wanting a big 4K 144Hz screen, because the listed specs make it a strong value for immersive single-player or controller-based play.
It is rated at 350 nits, which is modest for HDR. That means HDR will look limited compared with brighter mini-LED TVs, though it can still be fine for SDR use.
It can work well as a large 4K/144Hz SDR gaming display for casual or couch PC gaming. It is less ideal for competitive play because brightness, contrast, and likely input lag are not on the level of a true gaming monitor, and text clarity may suffer if 4K/144Hz requires chroma subsampling.
It appears to be a rebrand or closely shared platform, with similar display specs to models from Element, Sharp, and iFFalcon. That suggests the panel and feature set may be shared across brands.
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
Phillips in general is weird, in EU market it seems like they shoot out some good TV models, have great QLED TV's with Abilight implementations, but are lacking in the U.S market. They actually started selling ambilight TV's this year at Sam's Club, but specs seem very mediocre. It seems like the brand is trying to tap into U.S market more now though, so I wonder what 2026 will have.
They gotta cut corners somewhere to balance features and price
I had it two years ago. And you don't realize how much you. Until you don't have it. And I justAnd I just bought a new TV thinking that everyone. Has it now and they don't. Do you have it?
I had it two years ago. And you don't realize how much you. Until you don't have it. And I justAnd I just bought a new TV thinking that everyone. Has it now and they don't. Do you have it?
They crunched numbers and looked at more people streaming than watching OTA TV. So they decided to save some manufacturing costs and remove it. Thus another reason why this is the price it is
This could be a fantastic deal for a 144 Hz gaming display, but I'm unable to find any reviews for this TV, and the tech specs on Philips site are incomplete (possibly contradictory, where it says the maximum input resolution is 4K at 60 Hz; does that mean it supports 120/144 Hz only at 1080p?).
Yep, 144 at only 1080, just another marketing scam
Phillips as a brand as a whole has been underrated and for good reason due to selling off the rights of the brand to private equity firms. Offerings like these would need to happen more often in order to change public perception a/b the brand.
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This Philips 50-inch QLED 4K Google TV stands out as a budget 144 Hz big-screen option for casual PC gaming and couch play. The listed HDMI 3 and 4 ports support 4K at 144 Hz with an HDMI 2.1 cable, while HDMI 1 and 2 are limited to 4K at 120 Hz. Brightness is only 350 nits, so HDR looks weak, and the low contrast and likely higher input lag make it less appealing for competitive gaming. It is a solid value if you mainly want SDR gaming and streaming.
Common Questions (4)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
22 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank
HDMI 1 & 2 only 120hz at 4k
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!