Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredDesertGardener | Staff posted Jun 25, 2026 11:54 PM

Synology 2-bay DiskStation DS223j (Diskless) $135.18 + Free Shipping

$135

$195

30% off
Walmart
4.5K Views
Visit Walmart
Deal Details
Newegg Inc. via Walmart [walmart.com] has Synology 2-bay DiskStation DS223j (Diskless) on sale for $151.04 - $15.86 with clipped coupon on page = $135.18. Shipping is free.
  • Note, must be logged into your Walmart account to clip coupons.
About:
  • Centralized Data Storage: Consolidate up to 36 TB of data, and enjoy 100% data ownership and multi-platform access from anywhere
  • Next-Generation File System: Leverage file self-healing, lightning-fast data snapshots, and rapid data cloning
  • Secure Sharing and Syncing: Safely access and share files and media from anywhere, and keep clients, colleagues and collaborators on the same page
  • Simple Data Protection: Back up your media library or document repository to a variety of destinations
  • Versatile Camera Surveillance: Protect your premises with flexible monitoring tools
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Newegg Inc. via Walmart [walmart.com] has Synology 2-bay DiskStation DS223j (Diskless) on sale for $151.04 - $15.86 with clipped coupon on page = $135.18. Shipping is free.
  • Note, must be logged into your Walmart account to clip coupons.
About:
  • Centralized Data Storage: Consolidate up to 36 TB of data, and enjoy 100% data ownership and multi-platform access from anywhere
  • Next-Generation File System: Leverage file self-healing, lightning-fast data snapshots, and rapid data cloning
  • Secure Sharing and Syncing: Safely access and share files and media from anywhere, and keep clients, colleagues and collaborators on the same page
  • Simple Data Protection: Back up your media library or document repository to a variety of destinations
  • Versatile Camera Surveillance: Protect your premises with flexible monitoring tools

Community Voting

Deal Score
+6
Good Deal
Visit Walmart

Price Intelligence

Model: Synology DiskStation DS223j 2-Bay (Diskless)

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 7/23/2026, 01:35 PM
Sold By Sale Price
Amazon$209.99
NewEgg$209.99
Best Buy$234.58

Join The Conversation

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

23 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 26, 2026 4:30 AM
321 Comments
Joined Sep 2011
tallest1Jun 26, 2026 4:30 AM
321 Posts
If I have no interest in using the DS223j as a media server and simply want networked file storage and backups, this is perfectly fine, right? I can't see myself needing more than 10TB
Jun 26, 2026 5:08 AM
353 Comments
Joined Nov 2006
tweekerzJun 26, 2026 5:08 AM
353 Posts
yes, this is fine

Quote from tallest1 :
If I have no interest in using the DS223j as a media server and simply want networked file storage and backups, this is perfectly fine, right? I can't see myself needing more than 10TB
Jun 26, 2026 5:13 AM
1.6K Comments
Joined Jan 2013
SlashinhoboJun 26, 2026 5:13 AM
1,584 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank Slashinhobo

Quote from tallest1 :
If I have no interest in using the DS223j as a media server and simply want networked file storage and backups, this is perfectly fine, right? I can't see myself needing more than 10TB
If 10tb is what your looking for and your thinking using it for files, you may want to think about it more. These are great for media because if anything happens its only media. If your personal data is lost what do you do? Also, this is cheap but storage is not. Tou have to buy NAS specific storage which is more expensive even before the storage issue. I 10tb nas hdd is $400 and if you plan for some type of redundancy youll want to mirror which means another 10tb. Mirroring allows for one drive to fail before total failure. Also, do not use a m.2 for reading and writing unless you plan on moving data often. If you do you need a specific nas m2 for read only. If you write and it fails, everything fails.
1
Jun 26, 2026 5:30 AM
321 Comments
Joined Sep 2011
tallest1Jun 26, 2026 5:30 AM
321 Posts
Quote from Slashinhobo :
If 10tb is what your looking for and your thinking using it for files, you may want to think about it more. These are great for media because if anything happens its only media. If your personal data is lost what do you do? Also, this is cheap but storage is not. Tou have to buy NAS specific storage which is more expensive even before the storage issue. I 10tb nas hdd is $400 and if you plan for some type of redundancy youll want to mirror which means another 10tb. Mirroring allows for one drive to fail before total failure. Also, do not use a m.2 for reading and writing unless you plan on moving data often. If you do you need a specific nas m2 for read only. If you write and it fails, everything fails.
I've read from other threads that DS223j is NOT good for media since it doesn't allow for transcoding. I imagine that's why it's relatively inexpensive. Storage is expensive but I'm sitting on an old 1TB internal HDD, an old external 2TB SSD, and an external 2TB HDD with data I can't afford to lose. Isn't this the best next step? Or should I make a Raspberry Pi + SSD auto-backup NAS?
1
Jun 26, 2026 5:37 AM
1.7K Comments
Joined Dec 2007
ponagathosJun 26, 2026 5:37 AM
1,685 Posts
Quote from tallest1 :
If I have no interest in using the DS223j as a media server and simply want networked file storage and backups, this is perfectly fine, right? I can't see myself needing more than 10TB
Should work fine for that but you might be able to save some money by checking if you can just use an external drive with your router.

Or you could just backup those smaller drives to a single external drive. Or two if you want to be super safe and store one in a different location.
Last edited by ponagathos June 25, 2026 at 10:41 PM.
Jun 26, 2026 1:41 PM
15.9K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
Ride_The_SkyJun 26, 2026 1:41 PM
15,906 Posts
This would be a great dedicated off-site back up to sync your primary synology so you have a safe backup somewhere else in case your primary one dies/stolen/natural disaster etc, if you are not keeping a copy on the cloud.

I recently bought the 4 bay synology and so far I'm happy except the loud WD Red Pro hard drive, and I thought we can seamlessly connect to photos and files without the need for VPN (I use tailscale now, it's fine but it's hassle to remember to turn it on before you access files). Does anyone have a better way to access Photos without VPN back to NAS?
Jun 26, 2026 1:43 PM
3.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Jun 26, 2026 1:43 PM
3,411 Posts

Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank madmax718

I have one of these units from late 2018/2019- and I had always wished wished I got higher than the "J" model.

I paid a little more than this I think back then- so you are getting a pretty good value.

Mine is still chumming along- just replaced one of the drives in the mirror, and it wasn't because anything was wrong with it, but it had like over 6 years of on time.

This is a strong value when it comes to "file sharing"; there are many options for file access.

The limits are there; and most are "speed" related.
CPU speed: The CPU is very slow by modern standards; skip transcoding. It isn't optimized for VPN (no AESNI hardware) nor wireguard (slow single core CPU speed). If you stick to file sharing, it will perform very well.
Hard drive: If your using HDD's, you really need CMR drives, with a health amount of cache. There is a significant performance decline if you decide to use SMR, and with the market cheapening out on the cache the performance really suffers. Like most NAS, synology handles requests from a single drive, but can load balance the incomming requests between the drives. Your maximum throughput on a single mechanical HDD will be around 4gbps, until the next bottle neck. They do not recommend mixing HDD/SSD's in the drive bays (exception to the ssd cache models).
Network: A single 1GB ethernet is also the limiter here; thus a good CMR drive will be more than adequate. Do not use SMR if you can avoid it!!! (SMR dropped my throughput significantly).

USB 3.2 gen 1 ports are good for about 5gbps. There are some.. potential limitations; I don't know if they physically give you ports or if the ports are independent. You can hook up external hard drives (I actually got hubs to work for extra USB ports). You can't mirror them (i.e. you cant add an extra mirror volume externally) but you can add a 4 bay external hard drive enclosure to increase storage. These are not usable to the system except as an extra volume. (there is a work around but it is not part of the design). I use it for media storage as they are low priority (If I loose the data it isn't the end of the world, I can get them again). They still saturate the 1gb line. HDD sleep works on the external drives, so I have backup drives also hooked into it.

You can run these units in single drive mode. It will work just fine, but there will be no redundancy.

THe DVR license is included, and actually quite good- However I don't currently use it as it means the hard drives never sleep and are constantly being written to.

It is Tailscale compatible, but tailscale is wireguard, and thus there is an overhead cost on an already taxed CPU. The alternative is to have a VPN gateway handle the other aspects.

Some have mentioned running a RPI or other sorts to basically get network storage. That you can, most decent routers have a USB share port (glinet, for example) of which you can do a share. Heck if you have an old linux or windows machine, you can certainly share off that too.

The issue is complexity and cost; there are some good dockers for linux to manage your photos and what not, but if you want a pretty much "hands free" low tinkering solution to access your files from your phone, laptop, desktop for yourself and your family, its really hard to beat for this price.

However, and this is the "regret" I mentioned earlier; its roughly 120 dollars more to get the 225+; this has a full intel celeron processor, comes standard with 2gb ram, with an empty slot to add another 4gb, 2 SATA Drive ports, and 2 NVME ports , and an additional 2.5gbe ethernet port.

To me, these additions justify the extra 120 bucks; the intel processor can do transcoding (plex, etc), can handle OpenVPN (AESNI), wireguard, etc. With container manager you can run dockers, thus able to run your pi hole, home assistant, etc.

Hard drives: Synology at one point had locked down their hard drive list so that you had to buy theirs. They have since removed it. That left a bad taste in some people's mouth.
Any type of drive is expensive. Large capacities especially so. But with file sizes always growing (especially if you keep your drone footage, go pro, etc. ) it isn't uncommon to come back with 30-50GB of data each time.

The Psudo bridge: Run 1 drive, no backups, sign up for a google account that gives you 2tb for a certain $ a month. do a mirror between the two or a backup between the two. Google AI pro accounts gets 5TB for 19.99 a month.

If you consider the cost (4tb CMR, NAS rated) at roughly 200 bucks, and you still need a backup plan (off site, online, etc) at an additional cost, the google AI pro with the 5tb is an insanely good deal.
3

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jun 26, 2026 1:55 PM
3.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Jun 26, 2026 1:55 PM
3,411 Posts
Quote from Ride_The_Sky :
This would be a great dedicated off-site back up to sync your primary synology so you have a safe backup somewhere else in case your primary one dies/stolen/natural disaster etc, if you are not keeping a copy on the cloud.

I recently bought the 4 bay synology and so far I'm happy except the loud WD Red Pro hard drive, and I thought we can seamlessly connect to photos and files without the need for VPN (I use tailscale now, it's fine but it's hassle to remember to turn it on before you access files). Does anyone have a better way to access Photos without VPN back to NAS?
You can just leave tailscale on. It only routes traffic destined for the NAS.
You can also (on compatible routers) have tailscale on that instead of the NAS itself.

I place VPN in a different category than Tailscale- only because tailscale initiates its own connection, where as VPN you have to do it.

If you want a "non VPN" and "Non tailscale" endpoint, you can run the synology DNS- (usually a xxx.synology.me domain) where xxx is the name you give your NAS. You will have to open ports on your router to let connections through, and you would secure it through an SSL connection for web apps.

I personally don't like this as the surface of attack is quite large. When using as a file server, (i.e. mapping a drive) authentication options are limited; can't use OTP's, cant use security keys. Only the uname/password combo and SSL secure you.

Obviously you can have # of tries set so that it locks out the account, but that leads to DOS style attack surfaces. Again, why reveal to the world your inner workings of your network, when you can reveal only a tiny fraction.
1
Jun 26, 2026 2:00 PM
139 Comments
Joined Nov 2015
CoffejunkieJun 26, 2026 2:00 PM
139 Posts
I agree completely with madmax718 review. It works as a simple file storage on the local network or as a backup destination. If you try to do much more than that it struggles. That said, they have proven their reliability for me, are cheap, and easily integrate with existing synology set ups. It will not do whole disk encryption (folder is possible) and tailscale gets a little iffy depending on the connection if you are trying to do a remote backup. As a local backup device it is fine. I wish I had just got a 224/225+ but it does the job. I've used cheap surplus white label and refurb drives without issue.
Jun 26, 2026 2:20 PM
15.9K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
Ride_The_SkyJun 26, 2026 2:20 PM
15,906 Posts
Quote from madmax718 :
You can just leave tailscale on. It only routes traffic destined for the NAS.
You can also (on compatible routers) have tailscale on that instead of the NAS itself.

I place VPN in a different category than Tailscale- only because tailscale initiates its own connection, where as VPN you have to do it.

If you want a "non VPN" and "Non tailscale" endpoint, you can run the synology DNS- (usually a xxx.synology.me domain) where xxx is the name you give your NAS. You will have to open ports on your router to let connections through, and you would secure it through an SSL connection for web apps.

I personally don't like this as the surface of attack is quite large. When using as a file server, (i.e. mapping a drive) authentication options are limited; can't use OTP's, cant use security keys. Only the uname/password combo and SSL secure you.

Obviously you can have # of tries set so that it locks out the account, but that leads to DOS style attack surfaces. Again, why reveal to the world your inner workings of your network, when you can reveal only a tiny fraction.
I see above issues with port forwarding and thought about and passed on that already but for tailscale I am perfectly to fine to keep it running on mine and will have to train wife to make sure tailscale is running so she can access photos.

Do you use any file storage to replace dropbox type of service? I am just asking because I use Synology Drive (test running it right now) For example, I want to attach a file in outlook from my NAS while I am away from home. Outlook (which has option to go into native android file browsing interface) lets me select all my file sources including cloud like dropbox (and Synology Drive) and then it acts like native file browser and I can attach any file. To get the file out of synology, I don't have to login to anything or get into tailscale.
Why can't synology photos work like that? You can actually see all your photos in Synology drive (but won't shared spaces for some reason)
I'm on DS925+
Last edited by Ride_The_Sky June 26, 2026 at 07:23 AM.
Jun 26, 2026 6:26 PM
4.9K Comments
Joined Sep 2019
LavenderPickle7682Jun 26, 2026 6:26 PM
4,904 Posts
Be careful. The units might be getting cheaper (and this is their bare-bones entry level unit, as designated by the clearly-so-obvious 'j' suffix to the model number)....but the hard drives are expensive. Not only storage prices have increased due to American-style tariffs + al-slop price gouging, Synology has locked down the brand & types of drives you're "allowed" to use on many of their systems. The solution? Buy a "Synology" rebranded hard drive....at an increased cost, of course.
2
Jun 30, 2026 2:16 PM
3.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Jun 30, 2026 2:16 PM
3,411 Posts
Quote from LavenderPickle7682 :
Be careful. The units might be getting cheaper (and this is their bare-bones entry level unit, as designated by the clearly-so-obvious 'j' suffix to the model number)....but the hard drives are expensive. Not only storage prices have increased due to American-style tariffs + al-slop price gouging, Synology has locked down the brand & types of drives you're "allowed" to use on many of their systems. The solution? Buy a "Synology" rebranded hard drive....at an increased cost, of course.
They unlocked it, even before the uber sky high pricing increase.
Jun 30, 2026 3:04 PM
3.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Jun 30, 2026 3:04 PM
3,411 Posts
Quote from Ride_The_Sky :
I see above issues with port forwarding and thought about and passed on that already but for tailscale I am perfectly to fine to keep it running on mine and will have to train wife to make sure tailscale is running so she can access photos.

Do you use any file storage to replace dropbox type of service? I am just asking because I use Synology Drive (test running it right now) For example, I want to attach a file in outlook from my NAS while I am away from home. Outlook (which has option to go into native android file browsing interface) lets me select all my file sources including cloud like dropbox (and Synology Drive) and then it acts like native file browser and I can attach any file. To get the file out of synology, I don't have to login to anything or get into tailscale.
Why can't synology photos work like that? You can actually see all your photos in Synology drive (but won't shared spaces for some reason)
I'm on DS925+
On my android I just leave tailscale on- again, overhead (power consumption) is low unless your actually pulling files across. I don't currently use outlook, so I am not certain, but network shares are visible to me.

As far as photos, there is synology photos, but last I tried it wasnt as good as say google photos.

My general idea is always to *not* have my files locally, especially on a computer or phone.

This way a lost computer doesn't physically possess any data that I might loose.

However this is why I dislike the synology drive. There's not enough granular control. It can pull files that you want, but it will automatically store locally. You can "delete" it (hopefully you have one way sync on otherwise you will delete both copies), but there's not like "never keep local copies, always work online".

Basically, this is why I dont use synology drive very often, and just use mapped drives. Tailscale is nice in this regard as you have a consistant IP address per device (thus your mapped drives are always found).

I use the drive sync which lets you sync your google drive to your synology. This helps mostly for photos, to ensure an archive copy.
Jun 30, 2026 7:31 PM
15.9K Comments
Joined Jan 2010
Ride_The_SkyJun 30, 2026 7:31 PM
15,906 Posts
Quote from madmax718 :
On my android I just leave tailscale on- again, overhead (power consumption) is low unless your actually pulling files across. I don't currently use outlook, so I am not certain, but network shares are visible to me. As far as photos, there is synology photos, but last I tried it wasnt as good as say google photos. My general idea is always to *not* have my files locally, especially on a computer or phone. This way a lost computer doesn't physically possess any data that I might loose. However this is why I dislike the synology drive. There's not enough granular control. It can pull files that you want, but it will automatically store locally. You can "delete" it (hopefully you have one way sync on otherwise you will delete both copies), but there's not like "never keep local copies, always work online". Basically, this is why I dont use synology drive very often, and just use mapped drives. Tailscale is nice in this regard as you have a consistant IP address per device (thus your mapped drives are always found). I use the drive sync which lets you sync your google drive to your synology. This helps mostly for photos, to ensure an archive copy.
Thanks for the reply, but even with tailscale I motived remote file access from android requires file to transfer to local storage to open, so it's not much better than synology drive?
I am also trying to get rid of data on laptop or phone an dkepe it on Nas or cloud. One complaint though, I use cryptomator for my files on a container within local drive on my laptop but I did not see option to replicate thisneoth synology.
Is synology drive or remote access safe enough without encrypting old records like taxes etc? I don't see file level protection or maybe folder protection.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Jul 2, 2026 6:24 PM
3.4K Comments
Joined Jul 2013
madmax718Jul 2, 2026 6:24 PM
3,411 Posts
Quote from Ride_The_Sky :
Thanks for the reply, but even with tailscale I motived remote file access from android requires file to transfer to local storage to open, so it's not much better than synology drive?
I am also trying to get rid of data on laptop or phone an dkepe it on Nas or cloud. One complaint though, I use cryptomator for my files on a container within local drive on my laptop but I did not see option to replicate thisneoth synology.
Is synology drive or remote access safe enough without encrypting old records like taxes etc? I don't see file level protection or maybe folder protection.
That depends on your app. I often view photos/videos from the NAS without downloading over tail scale. It might depend more on your app and how it deals with network files.

Synology drive can use SSL over https I think. The thing is, it depends on a number of factors and whether you encrypt your SMB shares. I dont know what cryptomator is.

Generally, the synology drive works by synchronizing a folder and its files. having another container encrypted within it might cause some problems.

Would it protect your old tax records? That depends. Generally, file access is limited by username/password. I never quite understood why people liked that method (showing files but then denying access)... instead of straight out not showing it, as if it doesnt even exist.

Join The Conversation

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

Popular Deals

Trending Deals