Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Forum Thread

Police pepper spray peaceful students @ Davis

193 40 November 19, 2011 at 11:27 AM in Chat (2)
Just spreading the knowledge

Police pepper spray peaceful students
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/201...02728.html

Community Wiki

Last Edited by veritablequandary December 4, 2011 at 10:28 AM

546 Comments

Your comment cannot be blank.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Jun 2007
IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS
> bubble2 5,105 Posts
15,317 Reputation
Moot-N-Me
11-21-2011 at 12:05 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:05 PM.
Quote from redebeth :
PMed


Look, i think folks have a right to do their jobs too, bt the police simply did not *have to* do this. It was a sign of exasperation and irritation.
I for one agree the kids will be better off staying in class and taking school seriously and avoiding confrontaion like this. However, if my kid had the balls to be peppersprayed, i'd be a little happy, secretly.
Change does not happen easily. and if everyone here thinks things don't need to change, well I don't know what to say...
I agree with 12321, we'd all still be oppresed (except rich white boys) if people were all sheeple...bt this is part of the deal with oppression, they will will taze, hose and pepperspray. Again, change isn't easy.
So "when" should the police officers have acted? When a riot broke out? They don't need to repeat themselves 50 times. These people were told to get off of the sidewalk and were non-compliant along with just begging those officers to knock the chip off their shoulders. Right there is a clue that they may not be so harmless. They are in college acting like a bunch of idiots breaking the law.

Again the officers had to take the bystander's saftey into consideration too. It seems people fail to see the logical sequence here.

They should have protested in a legal manner to avoid this situation. But I honestly think they wanted this to happen. Why else would people taunt the police except for a reaction....caught on camera of course.

The pepper spray was used after other methods didn't sink into their thick heads.
Reply
Joined Jun 2006
Dark Lord of the Culdesac
> bubble2 18,322 Posts
1,504 Reputation
Jex
11-21-2011 at 12:12 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:12 PM.
I have a solution. Go down tomorrow and get any of the paper work that you may need. So that you can get a law passed that allows people to block all sidewalks/walkways etc. I feel bad for any disabled or elderly that require use of such areas. But the next time the kids want to block access, they will legally allowed to.

But I am assuming that probably means they will choose a different law to break. I guess you can't win them all.
Reply
Joined Jan 2009
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 765 Posts
520 Reputation
redebeth
11-21-2011 at 12:15 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:15 PM.
Quote from Moot-N-Me :
So "when" should the police officers have acted? When a riot broke out? They don't need to repeat themselves 50 times. These people were told to get off of the sidewalk and were non-compliant along with just begging those officers to knock the chip off their shoulders. Right there is a clue that they may not be so harmless. They are in college acting like a bunch of idiots breaking the law.

Again the officers had to take the bystander's saftey into consideration too. It seems people fail to see the logical sequence here.

They should have protested in a legal manner to avoid this situation. But I honestly think they wanted this to happen. Why else would people taunt the police except for a reaction....caught on camera of course.

The pepper spray was used after other methods didn't sink into their thick heads.
i don't see anything i wrote addressed so i don't know why this is directed at me ...
Reply
Joined May 2008
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,445 Posts
51 Reputation
jj.12321
11-21-2011 at 12:16 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:16 PM.
Quote from z2g :
It's totally fine to exercise your rights and to stand for a cause. HOWEVER, if you're trespassing and are asked to leave numerous times, it's best to just go. Fight another day. You can still make your point across by other means.

Being stubborn when you've been asked to leave and warned that you will be pepper sprayed if you don't comply is just STUPID. We're not talking about the civil rights movement here. We're talking about the Occupy Movement which is kind of stupid to begin with!
Give me a break.. Do you think Quadaffi gave permission for all those protestors in Libya?
Hell no, they were asked to leave many times and attacked.
Still, our government defended the "right" of these people to assemble, because it furthered our own interests.
When the shoe is on the other foot, our government gets out the pepper spray.

They are students, on the campus they go to.. That's a generous use of the word "trespassing". If this was an event to raise money for breast cancer, and they set up tents for a few weeks, do you think that would be labeled trespassing? Maybe at UC, but not at most universities.
Reply
Joined May 2008
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,445 Posts
51 Reputation
jj.12321
11-21-2011 at 12:18 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:18 PM.
Quote from z2g :
So, if let's say at your work, the normal procedure is to call the cops if someone robs the place. You call the cops and the cops come to arrest the guy. It becomes a hostile siege where the cops then blows the place up. Your work then fires you because they say that you shouldn't have called the cops yet and should have let the robber leave first.

Is that right for your work to fire you due to the aftermath of you following procedure? Or, would your defense be (and rightfully so) that you just followed procedure?
Bad analogy.
The fat cop should've known that spraying a defenseless woman sitting on the sidewalk (the picture) was excessive use of force. Just like the Nazis should've known that killing Jews was wrong and not done it. (Although that was obviously a more serious offense, I am not equating the two). That's where the famous "I was just following orders" defense originated from.

That's a huge difference from someone making a phone call.

Quote from Ram|bunc|tious :
Conversely, perhaps its the "good kids" that don't follow crowd mentality and actually do think for themselves.

Don't confuse compliance with complacency.
You are the one that is confused.
Reply
Last edited by jj.12321 November 21, 2011 at 12:20 PM.
Joined Jun 2007
IN THE SKY WITH DIAMONDS
> bubble2 5,105 Posts
15,317 Reputation
Moot-N-Me
11-21-2011 at 12:20 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:20 PM.
Quote from redebeth :
i don't see anything i wrote addressed so i don't know why this is directed at me ...
Of course you don't. You only see what you want to see.

Now I see why you would be proud of your kid for participating in such activity. Way to be Thumbup
Reply
Joined Jun 2006
Dark Lord of the Culdesac
> bubble2 18,322 Posts
1,504 Reputation
Jex
11-21-2011 at 12:22 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:22 PM.
Quote from jj.12321 :
Bad analogy.
The fat cop should've known that spraying a defenseless woman sitting on the sidewalk (the picture) was excessive use of force. Just like the Nazis should've known that killing Jews was wrong and not done it. (Although that was obviously a more serious offense, I am not equating the two). That's where the famous "I was just following orders" defense originated from.

That's a huge difference from someone making a phone call.



You are the one that is confused.

Haha comparing this to the Nazis killing Jewish people. Next thing you know it will be like the Crucifiction of Christ.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Feb 2010
L9: Master
> bubble2 4,199 Posts
164 Reputation
idkist
11-21-2011 at 12:23 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:23 PM.
Quote from jj.12321 :
The fat cop should've known that spraying a defenseless woman sitting on the sidewalk (the picture) was excessive use of force
What does the fact that he was spraying a woman have anything to do with the matter?

Woman Breaking the Law != Man Breaking the Law ??Dontknow

Well granted that is generally the case with women that sleep with little boys... but that's outside of this topic...
Reply
Joined May 2004
Warning free 10 years!
> bubble2 24,862 Posts
1,948 Reputation
Ram|bunc|tious
11-21-2011 at 12:49 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:49 PM.
Quote from jj.12321 :
You are the one that is confused.
Zing!
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 10,159 Posts
z2g
11-21-2011 at 12:53 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:53 PM.
Quote from jj.12321 :
Give me a break.. Do you think Quadaffi gave permission for all those protestors in Libya?
Hell no, they were asked to leave many times and attacked.
Still, our government defended the "right" of these people to assemble, because it furthered our own interests.
When the shoe is on the other foot, our government gets out the pepper spray.

They are students, on the campus they go to.. That's a generous use of the word "trespassing". If this was an event to raise money for breast cancer, and they set up tents for a few weeks, do you think that would be labeled trespassing? Maybe at UC, but not at most universities.
Quote from jj.12321 :
Bad analogy.
The fat cop should've known that spraying a defenseless woman sitting on the sidewalk (the picture) was excessive use of force. Just like the Nazis should've known that killing Jews was wrong and not done it. (Although that was obviously a more serious offense, I am not equating the two). That's where the famous "I was just following orders" defense originated from.

That's a huge difference from someone making a phone call.



You are the one that is confused.
You seen to use very extreme world news analogies that don't really apply to this case. The scenario in Libya is totally irrelevant. We're talking about the Occupy Movement protests on a college campus that can disrupt the normal school activities. It occurred on private property. And, more importantly, they were asked to disband. They were camped out on private property.

How would you feel if a bunch of homeless ppl decided to create a protest against the government in your backyard? By your token, they have a right to be there exercising their right to protest.

As far as your Nazi analogy, that's WAY off. We're talking about pepper spraying someone who's refusing numerous requests to vacate. And, the use of pepper spray is considered normal procedure. You are trying to compare it to the eradication of an entire population via murder?!?!!?

As far as my analogy not applying to this scenario, why not? We're talking about the same scenario where there are work procedures in place, an employee follows it, and he then gets in trouble for it. How is that different!?!?!? My point is that it's following work procedures and the consequences. HOWEVER, your analogy of a military person following orders to murder ppl is more analogous to the Davis case?!?!?!
Reply
Last edited by z2g November 21, 2011 at 12:55 PM.
Joined Jan 2006
L8: Grand Teacher
> bubble2 3,711 Posts
341 Reputation
FeedMeAlmonds
11-21-2011 at 12:57 PM.
11-21-2011 at 12:57 PM.
Quote from z2g :
You are trying to compare it to the eradication of an entire population via murder?!?!!?
Jesus Christ learn to read, he said I am not equating the two.
Reply
Joined Jul 2005
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 10,159 Posts
z2g
11-21-2011 at 01:01 PM.
11-21-2011 at 01:01 PM.
Quote from jsean :
Jesus Christ learn to read, he said I am not equating the two.
You should learn to use punctuation before criticizing others on reading comprehension!

That said, he is still using that analogy to support his argument, which is rather extreme. And, just because you state that "I'm not equating the two" after you mention it in your argument does NOT mean that it takes away from the point that you're trying to make as far as relating the two.
Reply
Joined Jan 2006
L8: Grand Teacher
> bubble2 3,711 Posts
341 Reputation
FeedMeAlmonds
11-21-2011 at 01:03 PM.
11-21-2011 at 01:03 PM.
Quote from z2g :
You should learn to use punctuation before criticizing others on reading comprehension!

That said, he is still using that analogy to support his argument, which is rather extreme. And, just because you state that "I'm not equating the two" after you mention it in your argument does NOT mean that it takes away from the point that you're trying to make as far as relating the two.
He clearly brings it up to explain that the excuse "I was just following orders" for defense originated from the Nazis and isn't a valid excuse to use excessive force in any situation. He was not comparing the two.
Reply
Joined Jun 2006
Dark Lord of the Culdesac
> bubble2 18,322 Posts
1,504 Reputation
Jex
11-21-2011 at 01:03 PM.
11-21-2011 at 01:03 PM.
Quote from jsean :
Jesus Christ learn to read, he said I am not equating the two.
How many accounts do you have? Scratchchin And your analogies are all over the place. Hard to keep track.
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined May 2008
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,445 Posts
51 Reputation
jj.12321
11-21-2011 at 01:06 PM.
11-21-2011 at 01:06 PM.
Quote from z2g :
You seen to use very extreme world news analogies that don't really apply to this case. The scenario in Libya is totally irrelevant. We're talking about the Occupy Movement protests on a college campus that can disrupt the normal school activities. It occurred on private property. And, more importantly, they were asked to disband. They were camped out on private property.
Let's see, the people in Libya were trying to disband their government and commited acts of violence (throwing rocks, etc). The Libyan government asked them to leave and sent troops in. The USA fully supported this protest.

The students were blocking a sidewalk.. OMG.. they might've disrupted a school activity.
(There's no evidence I saw where they were not allowing people to pass through).

So you are saying blocking a sidewalk is worse than trying to overthrow the government?
If so, you should run for congress laugh out loud
Reply
Page 8 of 37
Start the Conversation
 
Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.