Joined Feb 2006
Slickdeals Staff
R U an ultracrepidarian?
Forum Thread
Only read if you are NOT religious and/or do not believe in any 'supreme' being (othe
December 2, 2007 at
08:48 PM
in
Question
personal attacks will not be tolerated and will be mod alerted, if you wish to set someone apart use generalities, such as specific religion not speific person on SD for example
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you dont get the right to feel insulted, u have been warned...
so, peeps, if you dont believe in god, do you feel that ones that do are delusional?
a lot of people will sight karma or other things as 'he got what he had coming' but i argue that it's all a mathematical randomness that on a small scale might seem like karma
perfect example is: when you play poker and u push with the best hand, a LOT of times, you can predict/be so sure that the card will come that will beat you even if the chance of it coming is less than 1:6. when the card comes, some might argue it as karma, but i argue that its all random, just on a small scale randomness doesn't work
discuss....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
you dont get the right to feel insulted, u have been warned...
so, peeps, if you dont believe in god, do you feel that ones that do are delusional?
a lot of people will sight karma or other things as 'he got what he had coming' but i argue that it's all a mathematical randomness that on a small scale might seem like karma
perfect example is: when you play poker and u push with the best hand, a LOT of times, you can predict/be so sure that the card will come that will beat you even if the chance of it coming is less than 1:6. when the card comes, some might argue it as karma, but i argue that its all random, just on a small scale randomness doesn't work
discuss....
Community Wiki
Last Edited by Ram|bunc|tious
December 6, 2007
at
06:15 AM

wikipost loves you too!
866 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
What is there to "teach" about creationism? Fine, "God said Poof! Class dismissed" The only thing taught... would be how to disprove evolution.
Really... what would you say? Aside from listing off the reasons evolution can't be.
God made this.... then he thought it would be cool with some eyes.... and then he put a little fluffy cloud over here. It didn't go so well on the first night because it kept running into trees while flying in the dark! That's when God decided to give it radar! And that's how we have the bat.
I guess you could ignore the science of how they came to be... and just study how they are today. Maybe a little praise in there because he did such a knockup job?
As for the enzyme comment: Again, something cannot be fully explained. So, people just attribute it to God. It's just not good enough for me. I want to know. I'm not just going to take someone's word for it. We don't where science is concerned. Why do people do it with religion?
The short answer is, "No. My body had nothing at all to do with the miracle of survival, nor the 10 hours of things that needed to fall into perfect position to save my life."
It is interesting to me though how one might think that someone like me (certainly no athlete) would be able to survive an aortal arterial bleed for about 2 hours, when an athlete like Sean Taylor, younger than I, was unable to survive one.
And you're wrong about Scientists just throwing up their hands and stating that the enzyme cannot be explained. Many Scientists have had exactly this one thing lead them to the conclusion that there must be intelligent design, including the Scientist who preaches at my own church. It may not be your choice, but it is the choice of others.
As I said before, there is a choice to be made. If your choice is not to believe, then you've made your choice. There's no need to belittle the choice of those who believe otherwise. Stating that those who do explain the enzyme through intelligent design are no more fools than those who choose not to explain it at all.
In Jesus' case, why would (He) (or the Apostles I guess) create a religion based on just being a GOOD person if their quest was money and power?
I just find evolution plausible enough that I like to argue with people that find it unfathomable.
What is there to "teach" about creationism? Fine, "God said Poof! Class dismissed" The only thing taught... would be how to disprove evolution.
Really... what would you say? Aside from listing off the reasons evolution can't be.
God made this.... then he thought it would be cool with some eyes.... and then he put a little fluffy cloud over here. It didn't go so well on the first night because it kept running into trees while flying in the dark! That's when God decided to give it radar! And that's how we have the bat.
I guess you could ignore the science of how they came to be... and just study how they are today. Maybe a little praise in there because he did such a knockup job?
Drio, that was funny... I just spent a minute chuckling to myself.
It's my personal opinion that evolution as is - is wrong from the beginning. I'm not saying that EVERYTHING is absolutely incorrect about evolution.
I believe in the fact that things do evolve (change over time)... I don't think that was ever my point to dismiss.. Because I mean you can see it right now, with a naked eye... Creationism doesn't try to disprove that things and characteristics change...
It sheds a different light on how things actually came to be, NOT per se - how things are/were after they came to be.
I realize and even understand that the entire theory of evolution isn't just about "how it began"... It also continues on to say how species change, and adapt of conditions and life on this planet.
I don't think that the theory that Creationism proposes argues w/ the aspects of life AFTER it was created... And that's kinda why its called CREATIONism...
The short answer is, "No. My body had nothing at all to do with the miracle of survival, nor the 10 hours of things that needed to fall into perfect position to save my life."
It is interesting to me though how one might think that someone like me (certainly no athlete) would be able to survive an aortal arterial bleed for about 2 hours, when an athlete like Sean Taylor, younger than I, was unable to survive one.
And you're wrong about Scientists just throwing up their hands and stating that the enzyme cannot be explained. Many Scientists have had exactly this one thing lead them to the conclusion that there must be intelligent design, including the Scientist who preaches at my own church. It may not be your choice, but it is the choice of others.
As I said before, there is a choice to be made. If your choice is not to believe, then you've made your choice. There's no need to belittle the choice of those who believe otherwise. Stating that those who do explain the enzyme through intelligent design are no more fools than those who choose not to explain it at all.
I believe what I see, hear, smell, and touch until I have reason to believe otherwise.
But if science even gives evidence to the fact that we were actually "intelligently designed" - why would that be faith?
Let me ask this question arj. Why do you have to have "faith" in gravity? You can't see it, or touch it. Yet you know its there - because there is evidence (scientific) to prove it. Therefore, its not your faith in gravity - but rather your belief that brings it home to you...
I personally believe that if you look, you will find - and then you can believe w/ more than just faith... The trick to it is you have to look beyond just what you want to see, and look from a point of view that God DOES exist; and you will find evidence to back it up. If you look from the point of view that God does NOT exist, then you will only see what you want yourself to see.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
In Jesus' case, why would (He) (or the Apostles I guess) create a religion based on just being a GOOD person if their quest was money and power?
But if science even gives evidence to the fact that we were actually "intelligently designed" - why would that be faith?
Let me ask this question arj. Why do you have to have "faith" in gravity? You can't see it, or touch it. Yet you know its there - because there is evidence (scientific) to prove it. Therefore, its not your faith in gravity - but rather your belief that brings it home to you...
I personally believe that if you look, you will find - and then you can believe w/ more than just faith... The trick to it is you have to look beyond just what you want to see, and look from a point of view that God DOES exist; and you will find evidence to back it up. If you look from the point of view that God does NOT exist, then you will only see what you want yourself to see.
Scientists have the ability to date with Pb isotopes
I believe what I see, hear, smell, and touch until I have reason to believe otherwise.
What about gravity? does gravity exist? I'm not trying to be mean to you Mav, but you can't say that just because you can't identify it as being something tangible, doesn't mean it doesn't exist...
Remember back even just a hundred years ago or more... People died from bacteria, viruses (black death, plague, etc...).... They couldn't see them, touch them, smell, hear, etc... Yet they still existed.
The only difference is that we now have the capabilities to see them, and know that they are there... People thought that the world was flat too.... They didn't know any better because they couldn't prove it - they just saw the horizon, and thought "well that's where the earth must end". How wrong they were...
All I'm saying is that we don't have a "scientific way" to see God, or touch, or hear, or see him.... Essentially we don't have the scientific knowhow (don't think we ever will) to prove that God DOES NOT EXIST... Once someone finds a scientific way to disprove God's existence - THEN I will believe that God does not indeed exist...
I believe that there is at least some sort of higher power, some kind of god that created what we have today either by setting it into motion through evolution, just creating all of it, 6 day creation, or somewhere in between. I think this belief has a strong logical basis (which I do not want to debate here). Right now I have Christian beliefs (except hell), but even if Christianity is wrong, I would still believe in at least some form of higher power.
That being said, I also understand the position of atheists and agnostics. We really don't know what's out there unless we have experienced it or have proof of it. So I know where atheists, agnostics and "seekers" come from in that regard. I don't agree with this position, but I am respectful of those who hold it.
This is the issue with faith. Take for example, SlicKitty's experience (hope you don't mind, SK
This is where I have an issue. Some would say SlicKitty is delusional or stupid for believing in a God, even though her experience has convinced her. It's hateful and wrong to call someone names for seeing things differently from you, yet this is the attitude I see from a lot of atheists.
Now, I am not trying to make a statement about atheists, rather about religious intolerance. I know atheists that are more kind and loving than religious people.
But, the attitude put forth by some atheists or agnostics is very hurtful to people like me, who believe in a higher power.
I would say nobody truly knows unless they have had a real experience, and that is debatable by those who do not believe. So I think it is wrong for anyone to attack someone else who has different beliefs.
I think it is possible to disagree without being attacking, mean or hurtful, and ideally this is how everyone would disagree.
This is why I choose to live my life for myself. I believe that everyone should strive for excellence and find a mean in between their vices. If everyone lived by the golden rule this earth would be much better off.
me < universe
dog < me
God is not the only thing that's greater than you.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Scientists have the ability to date with Pb isotopes
Doesn't anyone wonder what must have gone through his head when he was on his deathbed?..... It was probably: "God I hope I was right".....
Yes, they have Pb isotopes to date w/ - but ummmmm, how are you gonna test a rock that is made up of NOTHING BUT CARBON w/ Pb.....?