BuyDig has
75" Samsung QN75Q80TA Smart TV + 4 Years Accidental Warranty on sale for
$1849 when you apply coupon code
ARX24 at checkout. Slickdeals Cashback is available for this store (
PC extension required, before checkout).
Shipping is free.
Note, 4 Years Accidental Warranty will automatically be added to cart. Discount will be shown on final checkout step.
Thanks to Deal Editor
iconian for finding this deal.
Specs:
- Resolution: 3840x2160
- Refresh Rate: 240Hz (Native)
- Processor: Quantum Processor 4K
- HDR: Quantum HDR 12x
- FreeSync Variable Refresh Rate
- Smart Platform: Smart TV Powered by TIZEN
- Ports:
- 4x HDMI
- 2x USB 2.0
- 1x RF/Cable
- 1x Ethernet
- 1x RS-232C
- 1x Digital Audio Output
4-Year Accidental Warranty Includes:
- Accidental Damage coverage
- Impact Damage
- Dropping while moving or mounting the TV
- From kids playing ball in the house
- Burn in covered - usually not covered by the OEM
- Remote Control replacement - hot swap, no question asked
- Tech Support Included - initial product setup and/or configuration
- Authorized service dispatched by Consumer Priority Service
69 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Yes, it without a doubt is the best implementation of HDR available as it's technically superior to the other formats. It's hardware based and makes numerous adjustments to the TV that many manufacturers don't let you change. The scene by scene or frame by frame metadata on the disc are interpreted by the chip, and are made to try to compensate for the shortcomings of TVs to give the best picture possible to get the closest possible picture to the creators intent.
After reading that I'm sure you're now scratching your head wondering why I would also say it's not important. A few reasons. While it's currently more prevalent than HDR10+, most home releases are also not in Dolby Vision. Speaking of HDR10+, it also offers the dynamic metadata that Dolby Vision provides. It is not hardware based, so it will work the best in Samsung devices but is rolling out on more and more devices. While DV can be mastered to 12bit color, no TV can display it, so they're both limited to 10bit color depth. Dolby Vision also becomes slightly less relevant when considering that most high end TVs have their own tone mapping algorithm to try to provide adjust.ments to standard HDR10 content to further enhance the image quality. Finally, it can only do so much to enhance image quality. If you do a "blind test" of say a Vizio M Series Quantum next to a Samsung Q90R I'd put money down that the majority would prefer the image quality of the Samsung over the Vizio. There's a reason Rtings recommends Samsung over pretty much every other LED despite the lack of DV support.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Did you go directly to Best Buy or called them?
I feel like trying to find someone on the floor is a major pain.
Yes, it without a doubt is the best implementation of HDR available as it's technically superior to the other formats. It's hardware based and makes numerous adjustments to the TV that many manufacturers don't let you change. The scene by scene or frame by frame metadata on the disc are interpreted by the chip, and are made to try to compensate for the shortcomings of TVs to give the best picture possible to get the closest possible picture to the creators intent.
After reading that I'm sure you're now scratching your head wondering why I would also say it's not important. A few reasons. While it's currently more prevalent than HDR10+, most home releases are also not in Dolby Vision. Speaking of HDR10+, it also offers the dynamic metadata that Dolby Vision provides. It is not hardware based, so it will work the best in Samsung devices but is rolling out on more and more devices. While DV can be mastered to 12bit color, no TV can display it, so they're both limited to 10bit color depth. Dolby Vision also becomes slightly less relevant when considering that most high end TVs have their own tone mapping algorithm to try to provide adjust.ments to standard HDR10 content to further enhance the image quality. Finally, it can only do so much to enhance image quality. If you do a "blind test" of say a Vizio M Series Quantum next to a Samsung Q90R I'd put money down that the majority would prefer the image quality of the Samsung over the Vizio. There's a reason Rtings recommends Samsung over pretty much every other LED despite the lack of DV support.
Yes, it without a doubt is the best implementation of HDR available as it's technically superior to the other formats. It's hardware based and makes numerous adjustments to the TV that many manufacturers don't let you change. The scene by scene or frame by frame metadata on the disc are interpreted by the chip, and are made to try to compensate for the shortcomings of TVs to give the best picture possible to get the closest possible picture to the creators intent.
After reading that I'm sure you're now scratching your head wondering why I would also say it's not important. A few reasons. While it's currently more prevalent than HDR10+, most home releases are also not in Dolby Vision. Speaking of HDR10+, it also offers the dynamic metadata that Dolby Vision provides. It is not hardware based, so it will work the best in Samsung devices but is rolling out on more and more devices. While DV can be mastered to 12bit color, no TV can display it, so they're both limited to 10bit color depth. Dolby Vision also becomes slightly less relevant when considering that most high end TVs have their own tone mapping algorithm to try to provide adjust.ments to standard HDR10 content to further enhance the image quality. Finally, it can only do so much to enhance image quality. If you do a "blind test" of say a Vizio M Series Quantum next to a Samsung Q90R I'd put money down that the majority would prefer the image quality of the Samsung over the Vizio. There's a reason Rtings recommends Samsung over pretty much every other LED despite the lack of DV support.
When you watch HDR10+ content on a Samsung it makes it even more infuriating that they won't support DV.
I was watching the grand tour on prime Video with my apple TV 4k, and decided to check it out on the included prime app that supports 10+.
It is a huge difference in vividness, and makes a huge difference. Samsung TVs could look so much better if they supported DV.
They have no good answer why they don't either. It is just them skimping on a feature that is important to the people with $2000 to spend on TVs.
Most people that can't tell the difference don't have a tv that can push DV to it's potential. It is most def better than HDR10+ by a good amount and far better than regular HDR10. Not saying everyone would care, but if you think HDR is important at all, then you would likely see a big HDR improvement between the two. And even if you are among those that can't, like I said, can't get HDR10+ on Xbox anyway. Def not all marketing plays.
Watching HDR 10+ content on Amazon Prime with my Samsung Qled looks very impressive , watching Dolby Vision content on Netflix with my LG BX Oled looks Amazing as well.
Love the Oled for amazing blacks and very nice highlight detail, really like my Samsung Qled for overall brightness which I definitely prefer watching during the daytime plus gaming.
ABL on the Oled hurts it for gaming, my Samsung you can blast the brightness and ABL is no where to be found. Oled has amazing depth to an image, that I prefer overall when movie watching though at night.
I like the Oled, I like the Samsung.
I also like my Nintendo Switch, PS5 and Series X....... 🤷 ♂️
I feel like trying to find someone on the floor is a major pain.
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews...75-77-inch
https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews...-q80t-qled
I feel like trying to find someone on the floor is a major pain.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
So c'mon, Samsung should just include it. No excuses.
I have a LG CX, Sony 950H, and a couple TCL 6 series sets. All include DV. I can see a major difference with it on/off. I have had a Q7 and a Q8. Both went back because I couldn't justify the price to performance ratio. Samsung can't even compete with the TCL until you look at their Q8 series or above, which cost 2x as much. I am not saying Samsung does not have good PQ, because some do, but if they had DV they would be that much better.
Again, if I am buying a premium tier TV, I expect premium features, not some knock off house brand version. The gap between DV and HDR10+ is only going to keep getting wider as far as media content is concerned. They are only being stubborn at this point.
Stop trying to make "fetch" happen. It isn't going to happen...
Again, if I am buying a premium tier TV, I expect premium features, not some knock off house brand version. The gap between DV and HDR10+ is only going to keep getting wider as far as media content is concerned. They are only being stubborn at this point.
Stop trying to make "fetch" happen. It isn't going to happen...
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
And I don't think it's a bad deal either... I bought the TV. However, if people didn't pay a premium for the OLED TVs, they simply wouldn't make them.