Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
03/12/24 | Amazon | $210 |
15 |
10/10/23 | Amazon | $165 frontpage |
17 |
07/11/23 | B&H Photo Video | $165 frontpage |
27 |
06/04/23 | Amazon | $209.99 |
0 |
03/18/23 | Best Buy | $209 frontpage |
52 |
03/12/23 | Amazon | $219.99 |
6 |
01/15/23 | Amazon | $240 frontpage |
34 |
12/11/22 | Amazon | $237.99 |
0 |
06/14/22 | Newegg | $33.99 |
2 |
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $273.99 |
Rating: | (4.7 out of 5 stars) |
Reviews: | 97,755 Amazon Reviews |
Product Name: | Crucial MX500 4TB 3D NAND SATA 2.5 Inch Internal SSD, Mechanical Hard Disk up to 560MB/s - CT4000MX500SSD1 |
Manufacturer: | Crucial |
Model Number: | CT4000MX500SSD1 |
Product SKU: | B09FRRWVWX |
UPC: | 649528906472 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
38 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
Nothing I've ever seen in the consumer realm.
The P3 is a DRAM-less (but supports HMB), QLC, NVMe drive. The MX500 has DRAM (512MB), TLC, and is SATA. Technically, the MX500 should theoretically be more reliable, due to the TLC NAND and presence of DRAM. Reality could be different.
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
and bhphoto: https://www.bhphotovide
Damn you, slickdeals! Lol
https://slickdeals.net/f/17095324-4tb-crucial-p3-pcie-gen3-m-2-solid-state-drive-ssd-160-free-shipping?p=1673
which was also posted by the same user/staff lol
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I checked a few sites, and the universal response was that any normal 2.5" sata ssd is going to solely use 5v.
Seems like a safe buy (plus easy return if needed)
Seems like a safe buy (plus easy return if needed)
What ssd's are 12v?
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
No DRAM in the P3
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MWink
Pls let me know. Is this more reliable than the P3?
I will mostly be using it as a gaming/ storage SSD.
Thanks!
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
Nothing I've ever seen in the consumer realm.
The P3 is a DRAM-less (but supports HMB), QLC, NVMe drive. The MX500 has DRAM (512MB), TLC, and is SATA. Technically, the MX500 should theoretically be more reliable, due to the TLC NAND and presence of DRAM. Reality could be different.
The performance characteristics can be quite different. The NVMe P3 will have much higher peaks but may have lower lows. When the pSLC write cache is filled, peak sequential writes could drop from >3GB/s to as low as 100MB/s. The MX500 will never reach speeds much beyond 500MB/s (due to the SATA bus) but probably won't drop much, even when the pSLC is full. Realistically, if you're not doing lots of large writes, you probably won't notice a difference. Personally, I'd favor the MX500.
Thanks so much. I went with the MX500 4TB. I have a Samsung 980 Pro as an OS drive.