Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $34.99 |
Rating: | (4.7 out of 5 stars) |
Reviews: | 132,725 Western Digital Reviews |
Product Name: | SanDisk 512GB Ultra microSDXC UHS-I Memory Card with Adapter - Up to 150MB/s, C10, U1, Full HD, A1, MicroSD Card - SDSQUAC-512G-GN6MA [New Version] |
Manufacturer: | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. |
Model Number: | SDSQUAC-512G-GN6MA |
Product SKU: | B0B7NVXLLM |
UPC: | 619659200572 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
39 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card
They don't want you expanding your memory so that you use/pay for their Cloud services. Easy money for them!
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
It is ridiculous...an iphone is $100 for every 128GB. If this were an Apple card it would be $400
SanDisk 512GB ImageMate microSDXC UHS I Memory Card - Up to 150MB/s - SDSQUA4-512G-Aw6ka
To be fair, iPhone has NVMe storage, so you should be comparing it to CFExpress memory cards, which aren't any cheaper.
But I agree, a SD card slot is useful for storing lossless music and other data that don't require high speeds.
I normally make 4k video. why I can't use this sd card for 4k?
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Look for UHS-I U3 instead of U1 at least. Doesn't matter if SanDisk or Samsung.
From what I can tell the SanDisk has a slightly faster read/write time (150 mpbs vs 130 mpbs) but the Samsung is rated better at video and has faster minimum read/write speeds with apps.
To answer your question, when you consider the Samsung was $25 and this SanDisk is $28, I would think the Samsung slightly edges it. Although if you're using the card strictly for data transfer of files and the like, the SanDisk should be the better choice.
The Samsung is currently $30 though...
Either way 512 GB for under 30$ is awesome. I still remember how amazed I was at seeing the first 1gb card