This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Save $656 by not driving like a maniac. The Supreme Court needs to ban these things
I don't "speed" often (destroys mpg efficiency) and even then is typically 4-7 over. All of this is the well within the normal flow of traffic. Radar detector helps remind me to mind my speed and protect against the small chance that a cop may decide to penalize even a marginal speed overage.
Not everyone using one of these is the maniac going 20mph faster than everyone else, weaving in and out of traffic, though if a ban on these would prevent those dudes, then by all means bring it on.
Would this be a major or marginal upgrade over my $27 detector from Temu that says "Caution...KA Band" on every detection ...in a super cute Chinese woman's voice?
....
Cau...Cau...Caution... KA Ba..Caution...KA Band
Save $656 by not driving like a maniac. The Supreme Court needs to ban these things
Saying the Supreme Court should ban radar detectors to stop speeding is like saying we should ban guns to stop shootings. You're going after the tool instead of the behavior. If someone is really 'driving like a maniac,' a missing radar detector isn't going to turn them into a safe driver.
A very common use for these are to save you from getting a ticket when cities drop the speed limit from 80 to 40 for a few hundred feet, such as at the bottom of a hill to fatten up revenue.
Saying the Supreme Court should ban radar detectors to stop speeding is like saying we should ban guns to stop shootings. You're going after the tool instead of the behavior. If someone is really 'driving like a maniac,' a missing radar detector isn't going to turn them into a safe driver.
There are versions of these devices that not only inform you when it detects a radar signal, but it can actively jam the radar by producing it's own signal. Cops have gotten wise to this so there are newer ones that will temporarily disrupt the reader without causing it to register a jam, and it allows you to slow down, giving you the additional time to reduce speed before it lets the cop get a reading on you that by that point is legal speed
There are versions of these devices that not only inform you when it detects a radar signal, but it can actively jam the radar by producing it's own signal. Cops have gotten wise to this so there are newer ones that will temporarily disrupt the reader without causing it to register a jam, and it allows you to slow down, giving you the additional time to reduce speed before it lets the cop get a reading on you that by that point is legal speed
You're thinking of laser jammers, which only work again laser. Radar jammers are illegal and will get you in trouble with the FCC.
Saying the Supreme Court should ban radar detectors to stop speeding is like saying we should ban guns to stop shootings. You're going after the tool instead of the behavior. If someone is really 'driving like a maniac,' a missing radar detector isn't going to turn them into a safe driver.
BS. The government ABSOLUTELY needs to ban guns to eliminate gun crimes, if they are able to enforce it. Ever see a gun crime in China? No. People actually walk on the street without needing to worry about anything. If they are not able to enforce a ban, then they should enforce a mandatory gun carry for everyone and prosecute whoever not carrying one. That's it. I love my guns, but that doesn't mean I think people should own them. The stupid guys takes up the majority of our society, and giving them guns help nothing on liberty or freedom but promoting hate.
Save $656 by not driving like a maniac. The Supreme Court needs to ban these things
I agree 100% we should ban internet because of all the prn, we should ban fm radio because of k-pop, we should ban tiktok because of GenZ, we should ban Instagram because it's just crap, we should go back to stone age because of the capitalism
BS. The government ABSOLUTELY needs to ban guns to eliminate gun crimes, if they are able to enforce it. Ever see a gun crime in China? No. People actually walk on the street without needing to worry about anything. If they are not able to enforce a ban, then they should enforce a mandatory gun carry for everyone and prosecute whoever not carrying one. That's it. I love my guns, but that doesn't mean I think people should own them. The stupid guys takes up the majority of our society, and giving them guns help nothing on liberty or freedom but promoting hate.
You want the government of trump, kash patel, kristi noem, tom holman, etc, to ban guns?
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment
16 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Not everyone using one of these is the maniac going 20mph faster than everyone else, weaving in and out of traffic, though if a ban on these would prevent those dudes, then by all means bring it on.
....
Cau...Cau...Caution... KA Ba..Caution...KA Band
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Meh, pre-paid legal services that turns every speeding ticket to a non-moving violation is the best way to go.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment