AnkerDirect via Amazon has Anker SOLIX C200 DC 192Wh LiFePO4 Portable Power Station + 60W Solar Panel on sale for $179.99. Shipping is free.
Anker Technologies has Anker SOLIX C200 DC 192Wh LiFePO4 Portable Power Station + 60W Solar Panel on sale for $179.99 w/ auto applied code WSTDEAR125 . Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for finding this deal.
About this Item:
This 60,000mAh (192Wh) battery delivers 200W and includes one 140W two-way USB-C fast charging ports.
5 Device Charging Ports: Power all your tech with versatile ports, including 1× USB-C (100W), 1× USB-C (140W), 1× USB-C (15W), and 2× USB-A (12W).
39% smaller than similar power stations, attach the strap (sold separately) to easily carry your power.
60W Solar Input: When your journey needs endless charging, do so seamlessly and sustainably with a 60W solar panel. This power station is not compatible with Anker SOLIX PS30 (or other 5V~3A USB-C panels), PS200, PS400.
3 Ways to Recharge: Fast Recharge to 80% in 1.3 hours with the PD 3.1 USB-C port. You can also use solar panels or your car.
LiFePO4 Battery Warranty: Power up for years thanks to LFP batteries. Your purchase is also backed by a 3-year warranty.
What is in the box:
Anker SOLIX C200 DC Portable Power Station, 60W Solar Panel, solar to XT-60 charging cable, Extension Cable, 60cm 140W USB-C to C charging cable, Safety, and Warranty Card
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
AnkerDirect via Amazon has Anker SOLIX C200 DC 192Wh LiFePO4 Portable Power Station + 60W Solar Panel on sale for $179.99. Shipping is free.
Anker Technologies has Anker SOLIX C200 DC 192Wh LiFePO4 Portable Power Station + 60W Solar Panel on sale for $179.99 w/ auto applied code WSTDEAR125 . Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Hunter phoinix for finding this deal.
About this Item:
This 60,000mAh (192Wh) battery delivers 200W and includes one 140W two-way USB-C fast charging ports.
5 Device Charging Ports: Power all your tech with versatile ports, including 1× USB-C (100W), 1× USB-C (140W), 1× USB-C (15W), and 2× USB-A (12W).
39% smaller than similar power stations, attach the strap (sold separately) to easily carry your power.
60W Solar Input: When your journey needs endless charging, do so seamlessly and sustainably with a 60W solar panel. This power station is not compatible with Anker SOLIX PS30 (or other 5V~3A USB-C panels), PS200, PS400.
3 Ways to Recharge: Fast Recharge to 80% in 1.3 hours with the PD 3.1 USB-C port. You can also use solar panels or your car.
LiFePO4 Battery Warranty: Power up for years thanks to LFP batteries. Your purchase is also backed by a 3-year warranty.
What is in the box:
Anker SOLIX C200 DC Portable Power Station, 60W Solar Panel, solar to XT-60 charging cable, Extension Cable, 60cm 140W USB-C to C charging cable, Safety, and Warranty Card
Model: Anker SOLIX C200 DC Power Bank Station (60,000mAh) and 60W Solar Panel, 192Wh Portable Power Station, LiFePO4 Battery, 200W Solar Generator, for Outdoor, Camping, Traveling, and Emergencies
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I just dont get why Anker holds back on the AC output for their top end battery products. Every other brand puts them on the smaller units (at least at low power) and i consider it an essential feature if youre going to be investing in something like this. Sure 90% of your needs these days are going to be met with usb-c but there will always be that one off device you need to power up via ac.
I just dont get why Anker holds back on the AC output for their top end battery products. Every other brand puts them on the smaller units (at least at low power) and i consider it an essential feature if youre going to be investing in something like this. Sure 90% of your needs these days are going to be met with usb-c but there will always be that one off device you need to power up via ac.
Space savings. Like you said 90% don't need AC, so why make things bigger, heavier, and more expensive for the 10%. The C300x has an AC version, which I think makes a lot more sense vs. putting it on a 200.
Space savings. Like you said 90% don't need AC, so why make things bigger, heavier, and more expensive for the 10%. The C300x has an AC version, which I think makes a lot more sense vs. putting it on a 200.
Genuinely asking, but what exactly is the use-case for a power station like this without AC? I have 3 72wh power banks that have more usable capacity than this. If this power station doesn't have AC for maybe powering my wifi router during an outage or maybe a fan with a conventional plug, then what exactly is the benefit of this bulky thing over bringing some power banks?
Maybe camping due to the solar, but you'd really have to be camping for like many days straight. My total watt hours from my power banks lasts over a week charging my phone and steamdeck.
Genuinely asking, but what exactly is the use-case for a power station like this without AC? I have 3 72wh power banks that have more usable capacity than this. If this power station doesn't have AC for maybe powering my wifi router during an outage or maybe a fan with a conventional plug, then what exactly is the benefit of this bulky thing over bringing some power banks?Maybe camping due to the solar, but you'd really have to be camping for like many days straight. My total watt hours from my power banks lasts over a week charging my phone and steamdeck.
The use case is almost definitely camping. Many people camp for many days straight. It's for people on a camping trip with their friends and/or family who just want to charge their phones and handheld video games, maybe a projector and Bluetooth speakers. I'm considering getting one for the camping music festivals I attend, and road trips where I mostly sleep in a tent or campsites without power.
My power banks also keep me decently charged while camping but there's something to be said about not having to worry about running out of power while on a medium-long trip, or not having to stop at a restaurant or cafe to recharge my power banks as I've had to before.
Why covert DC to AC just to convert it back to DC? Most Wifi and other appliances operate under DC and you can pick up a USB to DC adapter for super cheap. By removing the AC plug for these mostly lower power items - you save cost, weight, and optimize energy production and use by not wasting in the conversion.
Space savings. Like you said 90% don't need AC, so why make things bigger, heavier, and more expensive for the 10%. The C300x has an AC version, which I think makes a lot more sense vs. putting it on a 200.
but I dont need a "90%" device, i need a "100%" device
This really brings all the charging complexity of compact power banks, with none of the convenience (being small). I held out for the 12v barrel (cigarette style) version of this when i got one, if not for that (letting me add a 12v/ac inverter) i would not bring it anywhere as it's just not that useful if its limited solely to charging phones, tablets, and laptops. When i upgraded to a solar i went with a different brand that sells solar+ac for about 1/3 the price as anker. I like the brand but they are putting themselves into a price territory i don't think they are ready for.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The use case is almost definitely camping. Many people camp for many days straight. It's for people on a camping trip with their friends and/or family who just want to charge their phones and handheld video games, maybe a projector and Bluetooth speakers. I'm considering getting one for the camping music festivals I attend, and road trips where I mostly sleep in a tent or campsites without power.
My power banks also keep me decently charged while camping but there's something to be said about not having to worry about running out of power while on a medium-long trip, or not having to stop at a restaurant or cafe to recharge my power banks as I've had to before.
Okay, makes sense for super long trips, but I assume most people aren't going over a week. For anything under a week, multiple power banks seem like a better and more compact option. My power banks could probably last me 2 weeks if I only use it for phones. 1 week with Steamdeck or Switch. There are also solar panels that can recharge compact power banks too, so the longevity benefit of the power station still doesn't make sense to me.
Why have a bulky heavy power station when you can just have multiple power banks. Use one for the whole day, second day use another while the first one recharges via solar panel. Given enough power banks, you could have infinite power.
I'd rather spread out my 200-300wh over multiple power banks instead of just bringing one power station with 200wh. This way, if one fails, I still have juice from the rest of my power banks. If the BMS fails on the power station, all your stored energy becomes useless.
I have both the C200 and C300. The 200 w the solar array is a cool bundle. The C200 fits in my truck under the seat and can also be recharged with a cigarette adapter to solar connector - which I think is an official anker accessory. I basically put it in line with my accessories, so they stay powered up when the truck is off.
The 300 also has the inverter and can be charged via AC but it was too big for that kind of use. Both sweet products from a good brand.
I just dont get why Anker holds back on the AC output for their top end battery products. Every other brand puts them on the smaller units (at least at low power) and i consider it an essential feature if youre going to be investing in something like this. Sure 90% of your needs these days are going to be met with usb-c but there will always be that one off device you need to power up via ac.
Adding an AC inverter is costly and also quickly consumes the battery.
At less than 200kwh, the common user will plug household AC devices at high loads and leave a 1-2 star rating when their space heater only lasts 20 minutes since DC and cigarette lighter connections are vastly more efficient.
Genuinely asking, but what exactly is the use-case for a power station like this without AC? I have 3 72wh power banks that have more usable capacity than this. If this power station doesn't have AC for maybe powering my wifi router during an outage or maybe a fan with a conventional plug, then what exactly is the benefit of this bulky thing over bringing some power banks?
Maybe camping due to the solar, but you'd really have to be camping for like many days straight. My total watt hours from my power banks lasts over a week charging my phone and steamdeck.
I actually don't really have a good answer for you on that haha. 200 just seems too small. 300 is already small, but in the DC size it's pretty nice. I feel like the 300 AC is too big for the capacity, I'm not really sure the purposes of it is.
but I dont need a "90%" device, i need a "100%" device
This really brings all the charging complexity of compact power banks, with none of the convenience (being small). I held out for the 12v barrel (cigarette style) version of this when i got one, if not for that (letting me add a 12v/ac inverter) i would not bring it anywhere as it's just not that useful if its limited solely to charging phones, tablets, and laptops. When i upgraded to a solar i went with a different brand that sells solar+ac for about 1/3 the price as anker. I like the brand but they are putting themselves into a price territory i don't think they are ready for.
"but I dont need a "90%" device, i need a "100%" device"
Okay, makes sense for super long trips, but I assume most people aren't going over a week. For anything under a week, multiple power banks seem like a better and more compact option. My power banks could probably last me 2 weeks if I only use it for phones. 1 week with Steamdeck or Switch. There are also solar panels that can recharge compact power banks too, so the longevity benefit of the power station still doesn't make sense to me.
Why have a bulky heavy power station when you can just have multiple power banks. Use one for the whole day, second day use another while the first one recharges via solar panel. Given enough power banks, you could have infinite power.
I'd rather spread out my 200-300wh over multiple power banks instead of just bringing one power station with 200wh. This way, if one fails, I still have juice from the rest of my power banks. If the BMS fails on the power station, all your stored energy becomes useless.
I mean I'm with you somewhat, considering I also generally just bring power banks while camping. I don't know the tech specifically but I'm assuming you lose some efficiency with those solar panels that convert and output power into USB-C PD, but in general I'm sure they're also a good option. At the same time, a power bank that outputs 140W PD will run you a pretty penny, much less multiple to match this capacity, and then the solar panel on top of it. Why would one need 140W over USB-C while camping? No idea 😅
Still, I feel like this fits a perfectly reasonable use case, especially if someone is car camping and doesn't really care about a bit of extra space/weight. I'm envisioning a family or group of friends out camping with a power setup in the corner of their campsite— it's a lot easier to tell people to just plug their devices into that big block than to have everyone cycle between multiple power banks. Certainly doable but if the space and weight isn't a concern then having one single solution is (to me) clearly more convenient.
Leave a Comment
13 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Space savings. Like you said 90% don't need AC, so why make things bigger, heavier, and more expensive for the 10%. The C300x has an AC version, which I think makes a lot more sense vs. putting it on a 200.
Maybe camping due to the solar, but you'd really have to be camping for like many days straight. My total watt hours from my power banks lasts over a week charging my phone and steamdeck.
My power banks also keep me decently charged while camping but there's something to be said about not having to worry about running out of power while on a medium-long trip, or not having to stop at a restaurant or cafe to recharge my power banks as I've had to before.
Space savings. Like you said 90% don't need AC, so why make things bigger, heavier, and more expensive for the 10%. The C300x has an AC version, which I think makes a lot more sense vs. putting it on a 200.
This really brings all the charging complexity of compact power banks, with none of the convenience (being small). I held out for the 12v barrel (cigarette style) version of this when i got one, if not for that (letting me add a 12v/ac inverter) i would not bring it anywhere as it's just not that useful if its limited solely to charging phones, tablets, and laptops. When i upgraded to a solar i went with a different brand that sells solar+ac for about 1/3 the price as anker. I like the brand but they are putting themselves into a price territory i don't think they are ready for.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
My power banks also keep me decently charged while camping but there's something to be said about not having to worry about running out of power while on a medium-long trip, or not having to stop at a restaurant or cafe to recharge my power banks as I've had to before.
Why have a bulky heavy power station when you can just have multiple power banks. Use one for the whole day, second day use another while the first one recharges via solar panel. Given enough power banks, you could have infinite power.
I'd rather spread out my 200-300wh over multiple power banks instead of just bringing one power station with 200wh. This way, if one fails, I still have juice from the rest of my power banks. If the BMS fails on the power station, all your stored energy becomes useless.
The 300 also has the inverter and can be charged via AC but it was too big for that kind of use. Both sweet products from a good brand.
At less than 200kwh, the common user will plug household AC devices at high loads and leave a 1-2 star rating when their space heater only lasts 20 minutes since DC and cigarette lighter connections are vastly more efficient.
Maybe camping due to the solar, but you'd really have to be camping for like many days straight. My total watt hours from my power banks lasts over a week charging my phone and steamdeck.
This really brings all the charging complexity of compact power banks, with none of the convenience (being small). I held out for the 12v barrel (cigarette style) version of this when i got one, if not for that (letting me add a 12v/ac inverter) i would not bring it anywhere as it's just not that useful if its limited solely to charging phones, tablets, and laptops. When i upgraded to a solar i went with a different brand that sells solar+ac for about 1/3 the price as anker. I like the brand but they are putting themselves into a price territory i don't think they are ready for.
Then don't get this specific product...?
Why have a bulky heavy power station when you can just have multiple power banks. Use one for the whole day, second day use another while the first one recharges via solar panel. Given enough power banks, you could have infinite power.
I'd rather spread out my 200-300wh over multiple power banks instead of just bringing one power station with 200wh. This way, if one fails, I still have juice from the rest of my power banks. If the BMS fails on the power station, all your stored energy becomes useless.
Still, I feel like this fits a perfectly reasonable use case, especially if someone is car camping and doesn't really care about a bit of extra space/weight. I'm envisioning a family or group of friends out camping with a power setup in the corner of their campsite— it's a lot easier to tell people to just plug their devices into that big block than to have everyone cycle between multiple power banks. Certainly doable but if the space and weight isn't a concern then having one single solution is (to me) clearly more convenient.
Leave a Comment