Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Missed This Deal? Get alerts when similar deals are posted.
expired
Immortalsolitude 11.9K Views
Aug 24, 2026 8:01 PM

Onkyo TX-RZ30 170W 9.2-Channel 8K/4K Network AV Receiver $799

$799

$1,249

36% off
Adorama
Visit Adorama

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Good Deal?
51Comments
Save
Share
Deal Details
Adorama has Onkyo TX-RZ30 170W 9.2-Channel 8K/4K Network AV Receiver

Features
9.2-channel high-end amplification
Dirac Live room correction technology
Dolby Atmos immersive audio
IMAX Enhanced certification
Model: TX-RZ30

https://www.adorama.com/onkyo-tx-...xrz30bmdc?
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Adorama has Onkyo TX-RZ30 170W 9.2-Channel 8K/4K Network AV Receiver

Features
9.2-channel high-end amplification
Dirac Live room correction technology
Dolby Atmos immersive audio
IMAX Enhanced certification
Model: TX-RZ30

https://www.adorama.com/onkyo-tx-...xrz30bmdc?

Community Voting

Deal Score
+15
Good Deal
Bad Deal

Why are you downvoting this deal?

Price Intelligence

Deal History

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Community Reviews

The TX RZ30 is a 9 channel Onkyo receiver that stands out for HDMI 2.1, Dirac, and room to grow into a larger home theater. It gets praise for handling Apple TV, Plex, PS5 VRR, and 4K playback well, with flexible audio delay controls and strong value versus pricier Denon models. The main cautions are a reported audio sync problem in source to receiver to TV setups unless eARC is used, plus isolated reliability complaints like a dead front display and a loud power mode click. A capable midrange AVR if you want modern features without moving up to the higher tier.

  • The receiver can correct audio lag using its built-in audio delay with millisecond-level adjustment.

  • The receiver has reportedly handled AppleTV and Plex streaming without encountering the issues discussed in the thread.

  • The receiver supports HDMI 2.1 features like PS5 VRR passthrough and offers room for 9.2-channel expansion.

  • The receiver can be a capable option for a low-end theater setup when paired with a small or medium listening room.

  • Audio sync can fail for a source to receiver to TV chain unless eARC is used.

  • Customer service reportedly acknowledged a known audio-sync problem with an uncertain firmware fix timeline.

  • The front display can reportedly go dead after about six months and may require a lengthy trip to a repair shop.

  • The receiver may not pass 120Hz for VRR, which could require additional troubleshooting.

Common Questions (5)

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!

51 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:13 PM
15.2K Comments
Joined Aug 2010
turnne
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:13 PM
15.2K Comments
Quote from shaddai View quoted comment :
I would have agreed with you if it were not for the fact that folks other than myself talk about Dirac ART all the time. If ART wasn't important, why would Onkyo go out of their way to include ART capability in most of their lineup (finally) in 2027?
I am betting if you have the hardware its probably a simple implementation across your product line

But I bet I could count the people on one hand on slick deals that have actually paid for the Dirac ART license..or even DLBC

I am going to speculate based on the chatter on AVS forum, that the DIRAC Art buyers get a LOT more common in the upper ranges of the product line versus the mid and lower end product
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:19 PM
15.2K Comments
Joined Aug 2010
turnne
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:19 PM
15.2K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :
If ego were removed from the whole buying process and real-world FUNCTIONALITY and VALUE (price to performance) were instead the priority, the Camry buyer would be the far smarter of the two.
If price to performance was your sole driver you would never buy anything more than what is deemed " average" especially when pure function is all you consider

Everything I can think of has diminishing returns as you go up the product scale

From steaks, to cigars, to furniture, to A/V products etc etc
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:34 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Sep 2018
Zorba1446
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:34 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from turnne View quoted comment :

If price to performance was your sole driver you would never buy anything more than what is deemed " average" especially when pure function is all you consider

Everything I can think of has diminishing returns as you go up the product scale

From steaks, to cigars, to furniture, to A/V products etc etc
Agreed. The problem is, average Joe Consumer THINKS that he only has two choices: some crappy $500 soundbar or some $5-10K higher end setup. He's ignorant of the fact that with a little smart shopping he can get a very satisfying 5.1 for as little as $1-2K because the industry propaganda and the audiophool forums love to push the "you get what you pay for" BS narrative.
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:40 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Sep 2018
Zorba1446
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 6:40 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from shaddai View quoted comment :
I would have agreed with you if it were not for the fact that folks other than myself talk about Dirac ART all the time. If ART wasn't important, why would Onkyo go out of their way to include ART capability in most of their lineup (finally) in 2027?
Consider who those "folks" are---audio enthusiasts not the general public.

As for Onkyo, they didn't "go out of their way to include ART capability"---these electronic gimmicks are dirt cheap at the production level. Where most of the receiver manufacturers cheap out on is the more essential HARDWARE, i.e. the power supplies. That's why receivers have been steadily getting lighter and lighter over the past 2-3 decades. In 2000 the average mid-level AVR weighed 25-30lbs...today, a mid-level AVR is gonna be around 15-20lbs.

Manufacturers don't base their design decisions on what is "better" or not---it's all about whatever best enriches THEIR bottom line.
Aug 25, 2026 7:07 PM
3.3K Comments
Joined Dec 2009
shaddaiAug 25, 2026 7:07 PM
3.3K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :
Consider who those "folks" are---audio enthusiasts not the general public.

As for Onkyo, they didn't "go out of their way to include ART capability"---these electronic gimmicks are dirt cheap at the production level. Where most of the receiver manufacturers cheap out on is the more essential HARDWARE, i.e. the power supplies. That's why receivers have been steadily getting lighter and lighter over the past 2-3 decades. In 2000 the average mid-level AVR weighed 25-30lbs...today, a mid-level AVR is gonna be around 15-20lbs.

Manufacturers don't base their design decisions on what is "better" or not---it's all about whatever best enriches THEIR bottom line.
I think we have a good mix of both audio enthusiasts and general public in these deal threads. Do we really think only 1 out of the 2 is interested in saving a buck?

In 2027, the successor to this thread's RZ30 will be called the RZ31 and be Dirac ART capable. Do you think it will regularly go for $799 when it comes out or be a significant step change in hardware and pricing (and no longer qualify as a "budget AVR")?
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 7:12 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Sep 2018
Zorba1446
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 7:12 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from shaddai View quoted comment :
I think we have a good mix of both audio enthusiasts and general public in these deal threads. Do we really think only 1 out of the 2 is interested in saving a buck?

In 2027, the successor to this thread's RZ30 will be called the RZ31 and be Dirac ART capable. Do you think it will regularly go for $799 when it comes out or be a significant step change in hardware and pricing (and no longer qualify as a "budget AVR")?
The difference is that the general public, if they haven't been bamboozled by the industry's "costlier is always better," is driven by AUDIBLE cost-benefit ratio. Why should they give two s***ts if an Onkyo or Pioneer goes into "limp mode" when pushed to 85-100db when they never even go above 75db? That's just pointless ivory tower, OCD-hobbyist hand-wringing.
2
Aug 25, 2026 9:06 PM
30 Comments
Joined Dec 2025
YosemineAug 25, 2026 9:06 PM
30 Comments
Purchased this one to go along with the RC-70/RC-10/RC-LCR bundle on the front page. Seemed it would do everything I asked, properly pass through VRR for the PS5, with room for expansion.

I see a lot of debate on the quality of this receiver, and I am curious what else really would compete at this price point? With HDMI 2.1 support, 9.2 channels to grow into, 100w per channel, and Dirac it seems the best bang for the buck for someone looking for very good, if not necessarily god-tier, audio?

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 25, 2026 9:28 PM
390 Comments
Joined Aug 2011
NSAAug 25, 2026 9:28 PM
390 Comments
Quote from Yosemine View quoted comment :
Purchased this one to go along with the RC-70/RC-10/RC-LCR bundle on the front page. Seemed it would do everything I asked, properly pass through VRR for the PS5, with room for expansion.

I see a lot of debate on the quality of this receiver, and I am curious what else really would compete at this price point? With HDMI 2.1 support, 9.2 channels to grow into, 100w per channel, and Dirac it seems the best bang for the buck for someone looking for very good, if not necessarily god-tier, audio?
Mine didnt seem to pass 120hz for VRR. Is that a setting somewhere or a hardware limitation? I admittedly didnt look into it too far.
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 9:40 PM
3.5K Comments
Joined Sep 2016
vid1900
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 9:40 PM
3.5K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :

Exactly. Amir is a stereotypical audio elitist and that audio elitism is also highly supportive of his livelihood (runs a high end audio company) where you WANT consumers to buy into the "You get what you pay for" sales pitch (which is BS beyond a very low baseline price level, beyond which diminishing returns quickly set in).
Amir has recommended plenty of $49 headphones and $99 DACs so that shows the industry can produce well engineered products inexpensively; if they do some actual engineering.

Thats the fun of actual bench testing. We all love when the $99 underdog outperforms the $2000 'elite flagship'.
1
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 10:27 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Sep 2018
Zorba1446
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 10:27 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from Yosemine View quoted comment :
Purchased this one to go along with the RC-70/RC-10/RC-LCR bundle on the front page. Seemed it would do everything I asked, properly pass through VRR for the PS5, with room for expansion.

I see a lot of debate on the quality of this receiver, and I am curious what else really would compete at this price point? With HDMI 2.1 support, 9.2 channels to grow into, 100w per channel, and Dirac it seems the best bang for the buck for someone looking for very good, if not necessarily god-tier, audio?
Well, that's exactly the point...there's NOTHING with 9 channels that even comes close, other than the Onkyo 7100 which is 5 years old already and only $50 cheaper on Amazon. https://www.crutchfield.com/g_104...rank0009]9

You'd have to be an effing idiot to pay an extra $1000 just because of ASR's academic fear-mongering.
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 10:52 PM
1.6K Comments
Joined Sep 2018
Zorba1446
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 10:52 PM
1.6K Comments
Quote from vid1900 View quoted comment :
Amir has recommended plenty of $49 headphones and $99 DACs so that shows the industry can produce well engineered products inexpensively; if they do some actual engineering.

Thats the fun of actual bench testing. We all love when the $99 underdog outperforms the $2000 'elite flagship'.
Well, headphones and DACs have no bearing on his actual business, which is high end home audio installations. He is very strategic in what he chooses to review, and how he approaches those products. I'm sure he's a very successful businessman.
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 11:14 PM
3.5K Comments
Joined Sep 2016
vid1900
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 11:14 PM
3.5K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :
He is very strategic in what he chooses to review, and how he approaches those products.
That's true, 90% of his reviews are reader submissions. Whenever someone is bltching that he should test XYZ, he always says "Send one to me and I'll test it. I don't have the funds to buy even 1% of all the stuff you guys want tested."

Although he tells you he won't take amps over 100 lbs, because they are too hard for him to get up onto the testing bench....so that excludes a bunch of really high end stuff.
1
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 11:24 PM
3.5K Comments
Joined Sep 2016
vid1900
Pro
Aug 25, 2026 11:24 PM
3.5K Comments
If you want something tested by Audio Science Review:

9. What is the process of getting a product reviewed?

It is very simple. You start a conversation with me and tell me what you like to have reviewed. In general, the equipment needs to be in production and commercial. I unfortunately cannot test DIY projects as they don't have value to membership that can't buy them. If it is a DIY of a commercial offering, then it can be reviewed.

The typical wait time is 4 to 6 weeks from when equipment arrives. I don't have a scheduling system so there is no way to send me something just in time. Please note that priorities change, often causing some equipment to take much longer. Sometimes members want to have the equipment tested during their return period so I have to give priority to it over other things.

The process is mostly practical for members in US. The shipping costs, and now tariffs, make it hard to get equipment from outside of US and then ship it back. Sometimes the same can be accomplished by contacting the company that made the gear and having them send it for review. That eliminated the need to pay for expensive shipping back and forth.

As you can imagine, there is always some risk of equipment getting lost or damaged during testing. Both are extremely rare but can happen. For the former, you could opt to pay for insurance. For the latter, I will do my best to figure out a solution but can't make guarantees. In the past, members have been kind enough to chip in to pay for replacement gear for example. And I have sometimes sent substitute gear from my inventory. But again, these instances have been very rare.

When testing is finished, I usually mail equipment back at my expense although some members are kind enough to pay for that as well.
1
Aug 26, 2026 5:05 AM
4.6K Comments
Joined Mar 2006
tqlla3kAug 26, 2026 5:05 AM
4.6K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :
And most of those Craftsman buyers were just occasional home users not trade professionals so the China-made Craftsman tools served them perfectly well. Hopefully they did not pay full MSRP for the stuff, but hey capitalism is all about cashing in on consumer cluelessness.
The funniest part about the switch to Chinese tools, was that Sears would put the USA made tools on clearance to make room for the replacement chinese tools.

Anyways about this deal, Onkyo did show off their next line of receivers in January. Not sure when they are actually going to put them up for sale.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Aug 26, 2026 12:07 PM
3.3K Comments
Joined Dec 2009
shaddaiAug 26, 2026 12:07 PM
3.3K Comments
Quote from Zorba1446 View quoted comment :
The difference is that the general public, if they haven't been bamboozled by the industry's "costlier is always better," is driven by AUDIBLE cost-benefit ratio. Why should they give two s***ts if an Onkyo or Pioneer goes into "limp mode" when pushed to 85-100db when they never even go above 75db? That's just pointless ivory tower, OCD-hobbyist hand-wringing.
Just because ART doesn't interest you doesn't mean other folks aren't interested. I've already seen a number of folks asking in these RZ30, RZ50, and especially the RZ70 (due to cost and its status as the current Onkyo flagship) deal threads whether ART was coming via firmware. As we now know (and confirmed by Andrew Robinson and Onkyo employees), ART is not coming to the current gen of Onkyo products. I've said before: this really shouldn't come as any surprise given how processor and amp intensive ART is on an AVR so the more robust and expensive D&M units that can run ART are suitably priced given market demand.

You keep knocking ART w/o directly knocking it by saying who needs these "audiphool" devices? Active Room Treatment has the capability to reduce room resonances, reverb, and decay. If you're not interested in the BEFORE and AFTER waterfall graphs posted by ART users, then the most promising, consistent comment I've heard from ART users is that their bass now sounds tight and accurate as if they're wearing headphones (most of the time w/o the benefit of physical room treatments)!

Only a mere few years ago, folks in these similar threads commented: who's going to pay $1k for a 3800 and then pay nearly another $1k to go all the way to Dirac ART?!!! I suggest you go look at market prices now for either a new or used 3800 and that should answer the question. As a matter of fact, when the RZ31 comes out, I'll turn the question back at you guys: who's going to pay $1k (street price as I believe the MSRP will balloon to at least $1400 for an RZ31 just to add another possibly $600 to get to Dirac ART?

Join The Conversation

Share your experience with the Slickdeals community

Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!