Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expired Posted by iconian | Staff • Dec 19, 2021
expired Posted by iconian | Staff • Dec 19, 2021

Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player

+ Free Shipping

$150

$250

40% off
eBay
263 Comments 45,602 Views
Visit eBay
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
Best Buy via eBay has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99 (add to cart to see price). Shipping is free.

Best Buy also has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99. Shipping is free or choose curbside pickup where stock permits.

Thanks to Slickdeals Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
  • Note, pickup availability will vary by location.
Features:
  • 4K UHD Playback via HDMI
  • HDR10, HDR10+, HLG Compatibility
  • Near-4K Resolution Upscaling
  • Alexa & Google Assistant Control
  • Wi-Fi and Ethernet Network Connectivity
  • 3D Playback
  • Mobile Device Mirroring
  • HDMI and Optical Audio Outputs
  • Dual USB Ports
  • Dolby TrueHD & DTS-HD Master Audio

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This price matches our previous +41 FP Deal.
    • Rating of 4.6 from 760 Best Buy customer reviews.
  • About this store:
    • Return Policy:
      • eBay: 14 days returns | Buyer pays for return shipping
      • Best Buy: When purchased now through Jan 2, you can return this item anytime until Jan 16 (details).
      • View Amazon return policy here.
      • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
      • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

No longer available:
  • Amazon has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99. Shipping is free.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Community Notes
About the Poster
Best Buy via eBay has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99 (add to cart to see price). Shipping is free.

Best Buy also has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99. Shipping is free or choose curbside pickup where stock permits.

Thanks to Slickdeals Deal Editor iconian for finding this deal.
  • Note, pickup availability will vary by location.
Features:
  • 4K UHD Playback via HDMI
  • HDR10, HDR10+, HLG Compatibility
  • Near-4K Resolution Upscaling
  • Alexa & Google Assistant Control
  • Wi-Fi and Ethernet Network Connectivity
  • 3D Playback
  • Mobile Device Mirroring
  • HDMI and Optical Audio Outputs
  • Dual USB Ports
  • Dolby TrueHD & DTS-HD Master Audio

Editor's Notes

Written by StrawMan86 | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This price matches our previous +41 FP Deal.
    • Rating of 4.6 from 760 Best Buy customer reviews.
  • About this store:
    • Return Policy:
      • eBay: 14 days returns | Buyer pays for return shipping
      • Best Buy: When purchased now through Jan 2, you can return this item anytime until Jan 16 (details).
      • View Amazon return policy here.
      • Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
      • If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.

No longer available:
  • Amazon has Panasonic DP-UB420 HDR 4K UHD Blu-ray Player for $149.99. Shipping is free.

Original Post

Written by iconian | Staff

Community Voting

Deal Score
+76
Good Deal
Visit eBay

Price Intelligence

Model: Panasonic Streaming 4K Blu-ray Player, Hi-Res Audio in Black

Deal History 

Sale Price
Slickdeal
  • $NaN
  • Today

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

supermanrob
11403 Posts
1352 Reputation
Since Ms. Killjoy brought it up I'll give my opinion from personal experience.

Main difference is DV and the extra adjustments with "tone mapping modes" are more for people that like to tweak their PQ, example are PJ owners.
Since PJ's can't do DV the 820 is way overkill.

The 420 processes HDR better than any player in this price range(it's the same as the 820).
Since DV is dynamic HDR you get whatever the transfer of the movie gives you.
Depending on that transfer, the HDR processing on the 420 can rival a movie with DV.

The bigger difference is upscaling to 4K, the 420 does that even better.
It does it so well that depending on the transfer of the movie, BD disc may rival 4k streaming.

This player will give you the best PQ from all three disc formats and no issues that people often bring up with other players.
RakhepriY
292 Posts
29 Reputation
If you have a home theater speaker set up, physical media is worth it over streaming. If you're using the speakers built into your TV or a soundbar, you won't notice much difference with blu ray vs streaming. The immense difference is in the audio quality.
good_things7
692 Posts
176 Reputation
Finally, the UB820 is on sale as well.

262 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Dec 20, 2021
supermanrob
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Quote from turnne :
Ok...I missing something
You used a comparative phrase to give your objective view of the quality of a transfer

That would suggest that you had some that met your transfer expectations
Otherwise you have no reference to compare to....you realize that correct?
That was my question

As far as comparing HDR10 to DV with an OLED
I dont know what OLED you used so that makes a difference as well in regard to what you see
Yes I believe you are.... You don't have to define "transfer expectations" to see the difference between HDR vs DV.
Since there is no set standard on transfers they can vary widely.
All you have to do is use several DV disc to see the difference.

I'm surprised you say you "miss something" since you said "I have done that comparison you mention many times".

Regardless of which Oled was used there is no display I can upgrade to that would upgrade that difference worth the price. You are still tied to using a player to see the difference, there is no way around that.
2
Dec 20, 2021
1,568 Posts
Joined Apr 2007
Dec 20, 2021
Jesterrace
Dec 20, 2021
1,568 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
I think you just answered your own question, what's more important best quality or ease of streaming.
Agreed. Anytime I need convincing for why I do disc, all I need to do is take a streamed movie and compare it to the audio on it's disc counterpart. Streamed audio is so neutered by comparison to disc. Even with a budget 5.1 setup I put together from a Pawn Shop, I could clearly hear and feel the difference. I also notice a bit of sharper detail in the disc picture to.
Dec 20, 2021
1,333 Posts
Joined Apr 2005
Dec 20, 2021
bothanspy
Dec 20, 2021
1,333 Posts
Does this player have any built-in streaming apps?
Dec 20, 2021
187 Posts
Joined Nov 2011
Dec 20, 2021
pigeonpete
Dec 20, 2021
187 Posts
Picked one up from Best Buy. I wish it had Dolby Vision, but an extra $250 for the 820 just to get Dolby Vision isn't worth it for me, at least now. Just getting 4k OLED TV, so I want to see what the HDR optimizer can do, in general how good it looks versus DV from streaming Netflix and Prime. If I determine DV is a must have and I want it for my 4k blu-rays, I'll upgrade to the 820 or add a Sony X700 on sale or used just to handle DV discs.
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Dec 20, 2021
supermanrob
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Quote from turnne :
Using what is the typical TV here on slick deals is..ie.. a sub $600 65" LED
I most certainly believe there is a significant upgrade for $150-200 display wise

Over $1000-1200 I dont think $150 is going to get you much, if anything, in a better display
Again if someone can "upgrade" their display for $150-$200 AND "assume" it will "upscale" better it's their prerogative, they still need a player to view disc content.
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Joined Aug 2010
Dec 20, 2021
turnne
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
Yes I believe you are.... You don't have to define "transfer expectations" to see the difference between HDR vs DV.
Since there is no set standard on transfers they can vary widely.
All you have to do is use several DV disc to see the difference.

I'm surprised you say you "miss something" since you said "I have done that comparison you mention many times".

Regardless of which Oled was used there is no display I can upgrade to that would upgrade that difference worth the price. You are still tied to using a player to see the difference, there is no way around that.
Here is your full sentence..just to make sure I am quoting out of context
True but even IF the disc has DV and IF the the transfer is a good one which isn't often the HDR processing from this player often makes that difference minimal.

So if you are saying something is not..using your words
Then I ask the question what is, in the context of what you were talking about?

I assume you meant to use the word " cant" not can when you mention an OLED upgrade?

If that is the case..then we are going to say that is your opinion and one not shared by many
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Joined Aug 2010
Dec 20, 2021
turnne
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
Again if someone can "upgrade" their display for $150-$200 AND "assume" it will "upscale" better it's their prerogative, they still need a player to view disc content.
Agreed...and all things being equal, including budget , then one has to decide where money is better spent

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Dec 20, 2021
supermanrob
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Quote from turnne :
Here is your full sentence..just to make sure I am quoting out of context
True but even IF the disc has DV and IF the the transfer is a good one which isn't often the HDR processing from this player often makes that difference minimal.

So if you are saying something is not..using your words
Then I ask the question what is, in the context of what you were talking about?

I assume you meant to use the word " cant" not can when you mention an OLED upgrade?

If that is the case..then we are going to say that is your opinion and one not shared by many
That's the point, the "context" wasn't what was good or not good DV transfer content, it was the quality difference between HDR vs DV.

The transfers are not the same and can vary widely, unless you disagree with that opinion?

You said you did the same comparison, did you find a reference/master transfer where the DV PQ was significantly better that the core HDR PQ?
Dec 20, 2021
661 Posts
Joined Dec 2008
Dec 20, 2021
acefr
Dec 20, 2021
661 Posts
Quote from Logan_71 :
I'm tempted by this deal, as I'm stuck in a proverbial chicken/egg scenario.

I have an older LG 60LA6200 1080p TV that I've been very happy with. I also have a Yamaha Aventage 2070 AVR setup for 5.1 sound. This Panasonic would be the first step in eventually moving to 4k, and honestly, the cheapest step to take first.

Any problem with adding this BD player as my first upgrade, and the TV at some later date?
The cheapest step is not buying this UHD player. Your TV is 1080p and cannot display any 4K content, any HDR data, and any BT2020 color, so you simply can't see any benefit this UHD player provides. You can always buy a UHD player when you upgrade your TV, or if you are happy with streaming at that time, ditch UHD player altogether.
Dec 20, 2021
9,290 Posts
Joined Aug 2009
Dec 20, 2021
woodygg
Dec 20, 2021
9,290 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
The 820 is more intuitive with settings but the learning curve with them is pretty high.
To be honest the ones on the 420 are good for 99% for most PJ's. Just start with setting the HDR type to PJ and the others to auto and see how that works for you. Almost all the PJ owners I know are very happy with that.
Panasonic players are a must have for PJ owners in my opinion because those settings are only found on them and the processing is much better.
to what does PJ refer? thanks.
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Dec 20, 2021
supermanrob
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Quote from woodygg :
to what does PJ refer? thanks.
Sorry acronym for projectors.
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Joined Aug 2010
Dec 20, 2021
turnne
Dec 20, 2021
14,671 Posts
Quote from supermanrob :
That's the point, the "context" wasn't what was good or not good DV transfer content, it was the quality difference between HDR vs DV.

The transfers are not the same and can vary widely, unless you disagree with that opinion?

You said you did the same comparison, did you find a reference/master transfer where the DV PQ was significantly better that the core HDR PQ?
That was my question...what transfers have you seen that varied widely in the DV format?
With my statement I wasn't using the media transfer as my basis...since it was the same disc used by different players
What I saw was the difference in DV that could be made in certain panels using the same disc among panels and players

My opinion( to my eyes) is that there is a difference in the very best televisions. Whether its worth it or not, is a eyes and budget question to a potential buyer

To the vast majority of Tv's that you see here on slick deals I would say that would not be the case
1
Dec 20, 2021
283 Posts
Joined Dec 2010
Dec 20, 2021
Woodchuckwould
Dec 20, 2021
283 Posts
I've got a ps3 that recently died and I need a new blu-ray player for a handful of non-4k blu-rays that I have. I've got a 4k 55" TCL tv, which I'm fine with but under no illusions regarding the picture quality it is capable of. Seems like this is overkill for me and that I'd be better off with a cheaper basic blu-ray player. Aside from the upscaling, is there any reason I should spend about 2x more on this?
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Joined Jul 2010
Dec 20, 2021
supermanrob
Pro
Dec 20, 2021
11,403 Posts
Quote from turnne :
That was my question...what transfers have you seen that varied widely in the DV format?
With my statement I wasn't using the media transfer as my basis...since it was the same disc used by different players
What I saw was the difference in DV that could be made in certain panels using the same disc among panels and players

My opinion( to my eyes) is that there is a difference in the very best televisions. Whether its worth it or not, is a eyes and budget question to a potential buyer

To the vast majority of Tv's that you see here on slick deals I would say that would not be the case
IMO none are the same and many times they aren't even similar in quality.

Yes I agree your "statement I wasn't using the media transfer as my basis" which means it's not in "context".

Your "statement" is comparing displays OR players, even you admit that.

AGAIN the "context" was comparing the PQ difference from HDR vs DV, you only need ONE display and ONE player using several DV disc since the transfers are not all the same IMO.

That difference from doing the comparison IMO is often so small(especially with Panasonic players) isn't worth the cost IMO.
The advantage with the 420 you gain even better upscaling to 4K with everything non DV.

If I remember correctly you were one of the Sony 4K player owners that said you just leave "DV on", if so why don't you bother to switch?

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 20, 2021
221 Posts
Joined Dec 2014
Dec 20, 2021
ThePhog08
Dec 20, 2021
221 Posts
It's hard to believe they're still manufacturing uhd players that don't support Dolby Vision

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All