Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands for deals, including promoted items.
Heads up, this deal has expired. Want to create a deal alert for this item?
expiredvns1 posted Dec 13, 2022 05:43 AM
expiredvns1 posted Dec 13, 2022 05:43 AM

QNAP TS-653D-4G 6-Bay NAS Enclosure

+ Free Shipping

$520

$649

19% off
B&H Photo Video
75 Comments 29,976 Views
Visit B&H Photo Video
Good Deal
Save
Share
Deal Details
B&H Photo Video has QNAP TS-653D-4G-US 6-Bay NAS Enclosure on sale for $559 > now $519.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member vns1 for finding this deal.

Key Features:
  • Intel Celeron J4125 quad-core 2.0 GHz processor (burst up to 2.7 GHz)
  • Intel HD Graphics 600
  • 4GB SO-DIMM DDR4 (Max 8GB)
  • 6 x 3.5-inch drive bays (Diskless)
  • 2 x 2.5GbE ports
  • 1 x PCIe Gen 2 slot
  • 3 x USB 2.0 ports
  • 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports
  • 1 x HDMI output

Editor's Notes

Written by Corwin | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This is priced $90 lower (13.8% savings) than the $649 list price.
    • Refer to the forum thread for additional details and discussion.
  • About this product:
    • This has a 4.5 out of 5 star overall rating on Amazon based on over 840 reviews.
  • About this store:
  • No Longer Available:
    • Amazon has QNAP TS-653D-4G 6-Bay NAS Enclosure on sale for $559. Shipping is free.

Original Post

Written by vns1
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
Deal Details
Product Info
Community Notes
About the Poster
B&H Photo Video has QNAP TS-653D-4G-US 6-Bay NAS Enclosure on sale for $559 > now $519.99. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member vns1 for finding this deal.

Key Features:
  • Intel Celeron J4125 quad-core 2.0 GHz processor (burst up to 2.7 GHz)
  • Intel HD Graphics 600
  • 4GB SO-DIMM DDR4 (Max 8GB)
  • 6 x 3.5-inch drive bays (Diskless)
  • 2 x 2.5GbE ports
  • 1 x PCIe Gen 2 slot
  • 3 x USB 2.0 ports
  • 2 x USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports
  • 1 x HDMI output

Editor's Notes

Written by Corwin | Staff
  • About this deal:
    • This is priced $90 lower (13.8% savings) than the $649 list price.
    • Refer to the forum thread for additional details and discussion.
  • About this product:
    • This has a 4.5 out of 5 star overall rating on Amazon based on over 840 reviews.
  • About this store:
  • No Longer Available:
    • Amazon has QNAP TS-653D-4G 6-Bay NAS Enclosure on sale for $559. Shipping is free.

Original Post

Written by vns1

Community Voting

Deal Score
+30
Good Deal
Visit B&H Photo Video

Price Intelligence

Model: QNAP TS-653D-4G 6 Bay NAS for Professionals with Intel® Celeron® J4125 CPU and Two 2.5GbE Ports

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
11/29/21Amazon$550
10

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Top Comments

Dead_Cow
475 Posts
148 Reputation
Not well at all. I have 3 QNAP devices at home (TVS-672XT, TVS-471 and a TS-451D2-2G). The TS-451D2-2G is a 4 bay celeron that I decked out with 32GB of RAM. I have recently transcoded all my movies and shows to HEVC (h265). You could clean up all your media, and store it all your on this, then make sure you're streaming to modern devices only and turn off transcoding entirely. If you do that, this will be fine, otherwise, you'll need to turn off some features of Plex (like video thumbnail creation) because this will have a hard time getting out of it's own way. Even my TVS-672XT that's upgraded to an i7 with 64GB of RAM has a hard time with multiple 4k streams, but the truth is you don't need to transcode in many cases anymore if you've chosen the correct media formats to store in, then, install TDARR and let it go to town turning your entire collection to that format. A side benefit of transcoding to h265 is a massive space savings. I went from my collection being 24TB to 13TB with no perceivable loss to visual clarity. If you're not running some million dollar AV system, I have some 4k movies encoded with h265 and 5/1 AC3 that are less that 2GB in size. Also, make sure to remove all burned in subtitles. That's a huge cause for transcoding.

Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
pwnbox
18 Posts
10 Reputation
I've had this unit for a while now. And I think you got a defective unit; unless if you're speaking from personal experience and not collection of angry reddit posts - I would look to replace it.

QTS isn't terrible, I do think it's behind Synology or the others that you mentioned if you're just looking to NAS this device.

QNAP does have a lot of zero days - but it's pretty well documented about not opening up anything to internet on their forums, well any forums for QNAP due to this. Pretty standard for any type of App/Hardware these days to limit the attack surface as much as possible.

There's the third-party / maintained QPKG repos out there to help. But yeah, they're slow to update and they're third-party. I didn't find them clunky and worked as expected.

I migrated all my Apps (Sonarr/Radarr/Sab/PiHole...ect) to container station via Portainer / Compose. I do think Container Station would be okay but just for overall management Portainer is the way to go.

Not sure where you're getting the VM loading times and specifically for Home Assistant, as that's how I'm running my HA instance. It's back up in less than minute during updates via the App or system reboots (well maybe slightly on VM restart, def no where near 20mins)

I also have an Microsoft Intune/ConfigMgr lab running in there with multiple different client OS's for testing; Ubuntu and Ansible/Teraform lab - they're all speedy, I haven't found any issues.

I've updated the memory to 32gigs and haven't had any Kernel Panics / stops. The VMs see the memory I assigned and it's def over the allotted 8gbs.


I don't know, I just haven't had the experience you've outlined above with mine. I've maxed out the drives with 14TB disks, 32gb RAM. I did a lot of research when I first started looking and it was between this guy and a 6 bay Synology, I ended up on the QNAP just for the hardware and I knew coming in EVERYONE said QNAP software sucks and is inferior to Synology - I was worried I was going to see that. I've never used Synology - but I can say that I haven't felt I couldn't do something I wanted or had issues with so far. I don't regret going QNAP.
vns1
97 Posts
50 Reputation
Just to mention a few things that seem to be lost:
1. This is a Celeron CPU - so, expectations need to be adjusted accordingly. Don't expect some tremendous performance with transcoding videos for example - but it will still do the job.
2. RAM - it does support and can use 32GB (which is super handy if you want to run a few containers). That's what I have, tested and confirmed. The caveat - you must use dual-rank memory modules. Here are the details: https://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?t=165535
3. Fan noise - I have the 4-drive unit, fan is practically silent.
4. HDD temperatures - it is more than good. To do initial burn-in on the drives I ran ShredOS (similar to DBAN) to fill 4x16TB drives multiple times with random data. This was a 100% load for the drives for over a week - which is way beyond what's typical for a NAS - and all drives kept 40-41C and the entire system performed flawlessly.
5. Do you need 2.5G Ethernet ports - YES! With 4 drives at 160-180MB/sec I was getting 600-700Mb/sec combined easily from the drives. Your bottleneck is the LAN port. Even if you bridge the two you will still hit the limit.
6. Extra PCIe slot is very handy. I was surprised that a 10GBps Mellanox 311 SFP+ card was literally a plug-and-play thing. It was fully supported and just worked.
Minor annoyance with that - you will have to mess with the low-profile bracket as QNAP decided to use a non-standard bracket. Not that it was a big deal - I had to bent one bit, and drill a new hole for the screw (as I insisted on it being installed and screwed properly). You could just install it without the bracket and it will be mostly fine - after all you will likely put the NAS somewhere once and never move it from there.
7. The 6-drive unit is extra tempting as drives are really cheap those days. So, instead of transcoding or do other magics to reduce file size I would just get a few extra drives.

74 Comments

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 13, 2022 05:07 PM
475 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
Dead_CowDec 13, 2022 05:07 PM
475 Posts
Quote from xtreme571 :
Some TVs, even new ones cannot playback most files natively. I have LG G1 and that thing cannot natively playback H265 files with 7.1 audio properly. LG lists the TV can playback 4K H265 up to 60Mbits/sec, but the reality is different. Most devices struggle with HDR content and tone mapping.
What you're suggesting is completely valid, and if you have the overhead to transcode on the fly multiple 4k streams, I think that's awesome, but unnessecary, and you can stream to more clients with fewer issues if you're not transcoding.

In your TV use case: strip the subs and data out of the file and it'll play on your TV without transcoding. Even my 5 year old TCL's direct stream h265 without issue. The main issue with transcoding is data being presented that the device doesn't know how to handle, not the video codecs.

I am in agreement that streaming over mobile data presents a challenge that might require on the fly transcoding, but the devices are all completely capable. OP only asked if the original device would transcode 4k video, not over mobile data. For streaming over mobile data, in a case where you have an already optimized-for-direct-streaming/play library and are going to be regularly streaming over mobile data, I would suggest using Plex's optimize feature and keeping second copies that are already optimized for mobile as this second copy will be relatively tiny in comparison.
Last edited by Dead_Cow December 13, 2022 at 09:09 AM.
Original Poster
Dec 13, 2022 05:15 PM
97 Posts
Joined Nov 2019
vns1
Original Poster
Dec 13, 2022 05:15 PM
97 Posts
Just to mention a few things that seem to be lost:
1. This is a Celeron CPU - so, expectations need to be adjusted accordingly. Don't expect some tremendous performance with transcoding videos for example - but it will still do the job.
2. RAM - it does support and can use 32GB (which is super handy if you want to run a few containers). That's what I have, tested and confirmed. The caveat - you must use dual-rank memory modules. Here are the details: https://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?t=165535
3. Fan noise - I have the 4-drive unit, fan is practically silent.
4. HDD temperatures - it is more than good. To do initial burn-in on the drives I ran ShredOS (similar to DBAN) to fill 4x16TB drives multiple times with random data. This was a 100% load for the drives for over a week - which is way beyond what's typical for a NAS - and all drives kept 40-41C and the entire system performed flawlessly.
5. Do you need 2.5G Ethernet ports - YES! With 4 drives at 160-180MB/sec I was getting 600-700Mb/sec combined easily from the drives. Your bottleneck is the LAN port. Even if you bridge the two you will still hit the limit.
6. Extra PCIe slot is very handy. I was surprised that a 10GBps Mellanox 311 SFP+ card was literally a plug-and-play thing. It was fully supported and just worked.
Minor annoyance with that - you will have to mess with the low-profile bracket as QNAP decided to use a non-standard bracket. Not that it was a big deal - I had to bent one bit, and drill a new hole for the screw (as I insisted on it being installed and screwed properly). You could just install it without the bracket and it will be mostly fine - after all you will likely put the NAS somewhere once and never move it from there.
7. The 6-drive unit is extra tempting as drives are really cheap those days. So, instead of transcoding or do other magics to reduce file size I would just get a few extra drives.
Dec 13, 2022 06:01 PM
149 Posts
Joined Nov 2016
Wordsmith9091Dec 13, 2022 06:01 PM
149 Posts
I've got the four-bay version, and it has no trouble with transcoding with Plex, though I've never asked it to do more than two streams at once, and most of my devices don't need transcoding.

There ARE Qnap units that can only do hardware transcoding with their native apps, but this isn't one of them. Plex can use the Celeron's iGPU.
Dec 13, 2022 06:34 PM
186 Posts
Joined Feb 2019
CMarshall85Dec 13, 2022 06:34 PM
186 Posts
Quote from ElatedWalrus2609 :
I have had a WD PR4100 16GB RAM for years now. Wouldn't even consider another brand, runs Plex like it was made for it.. Good friend of mine swears by Synology and honestly I hear good things about them from end users as well. I more or less co-mod a computer forum of 61K members and growing and ran another of 10K+ in the late 90's.. I have been in the hardware side of IT for 20+ years, retail and commercial. Currently I work in provisioning advanced networking. The reason I question the amount of cooling and how they cram the drives together is this. Heat outside of physical damage (dropping) is the enemy of hard drives. There is a reason why a the major NAS hard drive manufacturer chooses to give a little cooling room around hard drives in the enclosure. Again in order to make the enclosure smaller QNAP is exposing the installed electronics to excessive heat which can affect performance Lastly why would "Two 2.5GbE Ports" be of any value on a NAS? Every NAS I have used is always throttled by the bandwidth available from the Hard Drives which is substantially less. Whatever brand NAS you settle upon keep cooling and internal temperatures high on the wish list. You are in it for the long haul and most consider NAS as an archival storage appliance as well.
You can add an m2 drive via the PCI-E slot and use it as a cache drive. That is where you can take advantage of the 2.5gbe Ethernet ports.
Dec 13, 2022 06:46 PM
287 Posts
Joined Jul 2005
nobody2000Dec 13, 2022 06:46 PM
287 Posts
This is a QNAP. Good hardware. Good Price. Horrible software.

If you get this, just....don't bother with QTS (the QNAP operating system). Get a high quality USB flash drive and boot something like unRAID or freeNAS or trueNAS.

Seriously.

QTS is horrible. When you first set it up, it's wide open. uPnP is enabled, so if it's enabled in your router too congrats! Your NAS is wide open to the internet!

myqnapcloud is a remote administration tool that relies on...again...a wide-open port. Worse, the software is so easily exploited that QNAP devices are frequently targeted for ransomware attacks. Even if you exclusively use your NAS for your own enjoyment and never publish anything externally, it'll get found and it'll get attacked.

Now - you can disable uPnP, close all ports except one you use as a VPN server (not client) port. That will work rather well. It's a good decision...however...

...QNAP software sucks. You can get the QNAP versions of things like Plex, or you can download versions of Sonarr/Radarr or other apps - it might work, but it's clunky.

...and if you decide to go about it through docker, they DO have container station...but it's crippled. It works poorly. You can put portainer on there and it'll make things better, but not all the way.

...and if you instead just want to run a VM - Virtualization Station is super slow. Like...20 minutes to boot home assistant (lightweight home automation software) slow.

...and the memory support only goes to 8gb. Yeah you can put more, and yeah it can detect and use it...but QTS finds a way to kernel panic once a week with anything more than 8gb in this type of machine. It's a virtual guarantee.

This device is good for its hardware, the fact that it sips, not chugs, electricity, and can relatively easily be used with a different OS.

EDIT - yes you can get used certified r720 with 128gb of memory for this price. It's also loud, chugs electricity, and doesn't sit beautifully in a small footprint where it could potentially live on your TV cabinet or somewhere like that.
2
Dec 13, 2022 07:13 PM
3,670 Posts
Joined Feb 2004
BubBowenDec 13, 2022 07:13 PM
3,670 Posts
Quote from nobody2000 :
so if it's enabled in your router too congrats! Your NAS is wide open to the internet!
This and this alone...

Anyone doing this should know better. QTS is fine, just don't be dumb and expose ANYTHING to the internet.

Bub
1
Dec 13, 2022 07:13 PM
1,892 Posts
Joined Jul 2007
LinoleumDec 13, 2022 07:13 PM
1,892 Posts
Quote from Dead_Cow :
My main point was that if you have your collection setup correctly that transcoding is completely unneccecary on most devices and computers newer than 3-4 years old. I don't transcode anything and have had up to 10 streams running at the same time with the only limiting factor being outbound bandwidth. CPU doens't even blink anymore. So if you're willing to put a few automations into your media routine, it's kind of a moot point. You shouldn't need a GPU at all. Let the client handle the decoding entirely.
Outbound bandwidth being the main reason for transcoding for me. Most of my media is 720p or 1080p. I limit remote streams to 4mbps/720p so that all of my bandwidth is not used. It is not uncommon for me to have 15-20 streams going at once. The 1080p streams will be transcoded to 720p. I used to run a G6600 on my server and it did everything just fine. I later upgraded to an i7-7700 which of course is better. CPU and memory usage are always minimal. It is the bandwidth that has always been my limiting factor.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 13, 2022 07:31 PM
18 Posts
Joined May 2014
pwnboxDec 13, 2022 07:31 PM
18 Posts
Quote from nobody2000 :
This is a QNAP. Good hardware. Good Price. Horrible software.

If you get this, just....don't bother with QTS (the QNAP operating system). Get a high quality USB flash drive and boot something like unRAID or freeNAS or trueNAS.

Seriously.

QTS is horrible. When you first set it up, it's wide open. uPnP is enabled, so if it's enabled in your router too congrats! Your NAS is wide open to the internet!

myqnapcloud is a remote administration tool that relies on...again...a wide-open port. Worse, the software is so easily exploited that QNAP devices are frequently targeted for ransomware attacks. Even if you exclusively use your NAS for your own enjoyment and never publish anything externally, it'll get found and it'll get attacked.

Now - you can disable uPnP, close all ports except one you use as a VPN server (not client) port. That will work rather well. It's a good decision...however...

...QNAP software sucks. You can get the QNAP versions of things like Plex, or you can download versions of Sonarr/Radarr or other apps - it might work, but it's clunky.

...and if you decide to go about it through docker, they DO have container station...but it's crippled. It works poorly. You can put portainer on there and it'll make things better, but not all the way.

...and if you instead just want to run a VM - Virtualization Station is super slow. Like...20 minutes to boot home assistant (lightweight home automation software) slow.

...and the memory support only goes to 8gb. Yeah you can put more, and yeah it can detect and use it...but QTS finds a way to kernel panic once a week with anything more than 8gb in this type of machine. It's a virtual guarantee.

This device is good for its hardware, the fact that it sips, not chugs, electricity, and can relatively easily be used with a different OS.

EDIT - yes you can get used certified r720 with 128gb of memory for this price. It's also loud, chugs electricity, and doesn't sit beautifully in a small footprint where it could potentially live on your TV cabinet or somewhere like that.

I've had this unit for a while now. And I think you got a defective unit; unless if you're speaking from personal experience and not collection of angry reddit posts - I would look to replace it.

QTS isn't terrible, I do think it's behind Synology or the others that you mentioned if you're just looking to NAS this device.

QNAP does have a lot of zero days - but it's pretty well documented about not opening up anything to internet on their forums, well any forums for QNAP due to this. Pretty standard for any type of App/Hardware these days to limit the attack surface as much as possible.

There's the third-party / maintained QPKG repos out there to help. But yeah, they're slow to update and they're third-party. I didn't find them clunky and worked as expected.

I migrated all my Apps (Sonarr/Radarr/Sab/PiHole...ect) to container station via Portainer / Compose. I do think Container Station would be okay but just for overall management Portainer is the way to go.

Not sure where you're getting the VM loading times and specifically for Home Assistant, as that's how I'm running my HA instance. It's back up in less than minute during updates via the App or system reboots (well maybe slightly on VM restart, def no where near 20mins)

I also have an Microsoft Intune/ConfigMgr lab running in there with multiple different client OS's for testing; Ubuntu and Ansible/Teraform lab - they're all speedy, I haven't found any issues.

I've updated the memory to 32gigs and haven't had any Kernel Panics / stops. The VMs see the memory I assigned and it's def over the allotted 8gbs.


I don't know, I just haven't had the experience you've outlined above with mine. I've maxed out the drives with 14TB disks, 32gb RAM. I did a lot of research when I first started looking and it was between this guy and a 6 bay Synology, I ended up on the QNAP just for the hardware and I knew coming in EVERYONE said QNAP software sucks and is inferior to Synology - I was worried I was going to see that. I've never used Synology - but I can say that I haven't felt I couldn't do something I wanted or had issues with so far. I don't regret going QNAP.
Last edited by pwnbox December 13, 2022 at 11:34 AM.
1
Pro
Dec 13, 2022 07:35 PM
4,207 Posts
Joined Jul 2006
HomerJay
Pro
Dec 13, 2022 07:35 PM
4,207 Posts
Quote from Consumer1337 :
Can it just run on 2 drives?
You can get a 2 Bay one for a lot less
Dec 13, 2022 07:46 PM
475 Posts
Joined Oct 2004
Dead_CowDec 13, 2022 07:46 PM
475 Posts
Quote from nobody2000 :
This is a QNAP. Good hardware. Good Price. Horrible software.

If you get this, just....don't bother with QTS (the QNAP operating system). Get a high quality USB flash drive and boot something like unRAID or freeNAS or trueNAS.

Seriously.

QTS is horrible. When you first set it up, it's wide open. uPnP is enabled, so if it's enabled in your router too congrats! Your NAS is wide open to the internet!

myqnapcloud is a remote administration tool that relies on...again...a wide-open port. Worse, the software is so easily exploited that QNAP devices are frequently targeted for ransomware attacks. Even if you exclusively use your NAS for your own enjoyment and never publish anything externally, it'll get found and it'll get attacked.

Now - you can disable uPnP, close all ports except one you use as a VPN server (not client) port. That will work rather well. It's a good decision...however...

...QNAP software sucks. You can get the QNAP versions of things like Plex, or you can download versions of Sonarr/Radarr or other apps - it might work, but it's clunky.

...and if you decide to go about it through docker, they DO have container station...but it's crippled. It works poorly. You can put portainer on there and it'll make things better, but not all the way.

...and if you instead just want to run a VM - Virtualization Station is super slow. Like...20 minutes to boot home assistant (lightweight home automation software) slow.

...and the memory support only goes to 8gb. Yeah you can put more, and yeah it can detect and use it...but QTS finds a way to kernel panic once a week with anything more than 8gb in this type of machine. It's a virtual guarantee.

This device is good for its hardware, the fact that it sips, not chugs, electricity, and can relatively easily be used with a different OS.

EDIT - yes you can get used certified r720 with 128gb of memory for this price. It's also loud, chugs electricity, and doesn't sit beautifully in a small footprint where it could potentially live on your TV cabinet or somewhere like that.
Just FYI, QTS no longer enables any external interface by default and UPNP is off as well.

Qnap security advisor does a great job of monitoring and showing how to further secure the device, but is not installed by default, which is weird.
Dec 13, 2022 07:51 PM
1,218 Posts
Joined Aug 2007
husky55Dec 13, 2022 07:51 PM
1,218 Posts
Quote from pwnbox :
I've had this unit for a while now. And I think you got a defective unit; unless if you're speaking from personal experience and not collection of angry reddit posts - I would look to replace it.

QTS isn't terrible, I do think it's behind Synology or the others that you mentioned if you're just looking to NAS this device.

QNAP does have a lot of zero days - but it's pretty well documented about not opening up anything to internet on their forums, well any forums for QNAP due to this. Pretty standard for any type of App/Hardware these days to limit the attack surface as much as possible.

There's the third-party / maintained QPKG repos out there to help. But yeah, they're slow to update and they're third-party. I didn't find them clunky and worked as expected.

I migrated all my Apps (Sonarr/Radarr/Sab/PiHole...ect) to container station via Portainer / Compose. I do think Container Station would be okay but just for overall management Portainer is the way to go.

Not sure where you're getting the VM loading times and specifically for Home Assistant, as that's how I'm running my HA instance. It's back up in less than minute during updates via the App or system reboots (well maybe slightly on VM restart, def no where near 20mins)

I also have an Microsoft Intune/ConfigMgr lab running in there with multiple different client OS's for testing; Ubuntu and Ansible/Teraform lab - they're all speedy, I haven't found any issues.

I've updated the memory to 32gigs and haven't had any Kernel Panics / stops. The VMs see the memory I assigned and it's def over the allotted 8gbs.


I don't know, I just haven't had the experience you've outlined above with mine. I've maxed out the drives with 14TB disks, 32gb RAM. I did a lot of research when I first started looking and it was between this guy and a 6 bay Synology, I ended up on the QNAP just for the hardware and I knew coming in EVERYONE said QNAP software sucks and is inferior to Synology - I was worried I was going to see that. I've never used Synology - but I can say that I haven't felt I couldn't do something I wanted or had issues with so far. I don't regret going QNAP.
I am a Synology nas owner but I completely agree with you on this!!!
Dec 13, 2022 08:08 PM
84 Posts
Joined Mar 2022
fsxbobDec 13, 2022 08:08 PM
84 Posts
This is similar hardware to other NAS's in the price point. It should run and transcode plex well, note you do need to purchase Plex Pass for the software to enable hardware acceleration and make transcoding smooth. Even Synology users look for models with the Intel Celeron for plex purposes because other processors don't support hardware acceleration.
Dec 13, 2022 08:24 PM
32 Posts
Joined Nov 2022
OrangeMeat5576Dec 13, 2022 08:24 PM
32 Posts
Quote from Dead_Cow :
Not well at all. I have 3 QNAP devices at home (TVS-672XT, TVS-471 and a TS-451D2-2G). The TS-451D2-2G is a 4 bay celeron that I decked out with 32GB of RAM. I have recently transcoded all my movies and shows to HEVC (h265). You could clean up all your media, and store it all your on this, then make sure you're streaming to modern devices only and turn off transcoding entirely. If you do that, this will be fine, otherwise, you'll need to turn off some features of Plex (like video thumbnail creation) because this will have a hard time getting out of it's own way. Even my TVS-672XT that's upgraded to an i7 with 64GB of RAM has a hard time with multiple 4k streams, but the truth is you don't need to transcode in many cases anymore if you've chosen the correct media formats to store in, then, install TDARR and let it go to town turning your entire collection to that format. A side benefit of transcoding to h265 is a massive space savings. I went from my collection being 24TB to 13TB with no perceivable loss to visual clarity. If you're not running some million dollar AV system, I have some 4k movies encoded with h265 and 5/1 AC3 that are less that 2GB in size. Also, make sure to remove all burned in subtitles. That's a huge cause for transcoding.

Sorry for rambling. TL;DR: this is completely inadequate for transcoding really anything (not just 4k), but you shouldn't need too nowadays.
What do I do if I need subtitles? Do I still encode them to H265 but without burned in subtitles?
Dec 13, 2022 09:36 PM
4 Posts
Joined Jul 2019
SmartWater499Dec 13, 2022 09:36 PM
4 Posts
This can transcode up to hevc 10bit with native plex. Its usually subtitles and audio transcoding that can bring the unit down as that is straight cpu.

Also out of the box with the latest qts is decently secure. I would never connect any nas directly to the internet.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Dec 13, 2022 09:57 PM
342 Posts
Joined Dec 2012
nyantaDec 13, 2022 09:57 PM
342 Posts
Take the word from an at the time novice user who connected his NAS to the internet and paid the price (ransomware) don't connect to the internet and if possible backup your NAS!
1

Leave a Comment

Unregistered (You)

Popular Deals

View All

Trending Deals

View All