Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Sold By | Sale Price |
---|---|
Amazon | $649.99 |
Rating: | (4.2 out of 5 stars) |
Reviews: | 570 Amazon Reviews |
Product Name: | AORUS FI32U 32" 4K SS IPS Gaming Monitor, Exclusive Built-in ANC, 3840x2160 Display, 144 Hz Refresh Rate, 1ms Response Time (GTG), 1x Display Port 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB 3.0, with Type-C, BLACK |
Manufacturer: | GIGABYTE |
Model Number: | AORUS FI32U-SA |
Product SKU: | B09885HV8C |
UPC: | 889523024348 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
13 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Fair point, even with all the evidence burn in is negligible on LG C2s I still get nervous. I take all the counter measures though and when I see a 4k movie or game on it in HDR I think "how could I go back to anything else" now. I REALLY wish we were getting FALD monitors around the $600 price point for 4k 144hz but unfortunately they are the same price as OLED right now.
Sounds like you might not be using it for your computer. But with the static elements on both Mac & Windows, and my tendency to game for endless hours on Xbox, my usage is unfortunately very much burn-in prone.
I have no doubt the picture on OLED is life changing, I just don't have the pocketbook to back replacing the screen. I could totally be over-worrying though.
You're right - there are a few monitors 27" and 32" that are being released with over 1000 dimming zones and Mini LED tech. I tried one from INNOCN (27M2V) , the picture was absolutely insane for an IPS panel. The problem is almost everything else about the monitor design was underwhelming or frustrating. A couple other companies have 1000+ dimming zone models. The problem is the price. They are all in the $750-1,000++ range, which at that point is basically a TV. Round and round it goes!
21:9 is probably the way to go. 32:9 is not supported enough,
Trends for gaming seems 21:9.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
21:9 is probably the way to go. 32:9 is not supported enough,
Trends for gaming seems 21:9.
I didn't go to 4K / UW-UHD because they are cost prohibitive. IF OLED's didn't have burn-in risk, I would've splurged on a UW-UHD OLED 4K. But they do have that risk - so it wasn't worth the hefty investment. Especially since I will use it for Xbox gaming, which has black bars due to the limitation of the Xbox - and that just seems like tempting burn-in to occur.
21:9 and other UW resolutions are incredible for PC gaming and awesome for productivity. But the majority of Console users game on their TV. So I do believe we'll have 21:9 at least for the foreseeable future on console.
I didn't go to 4K / UW-UHD because they are cost prohibitive. IF OLED's didn't have burn-in risk, I would've splurged on a UW-UHD OLED 4K. But they do have that risk - so it wasn't worth the hefty investment. Especially since I will use it for Xbox gaming, which has black bars due to the limitation of the Xbox - and that just seems like tempting burn-in to occur.
21:9 and other UW resolutions are incredible for PC gaming and awesome for productivity. But the majority of Console users game on their TV. So I do believe we'll have 21:9 at least for the foreseeable future on console.
OLEDs have come a long way. As long as you're not leaving it on a static image for long periods you shouldn't have anything to worry about