Slickdeals is community-supported.  We may get paid by brands or deals, including promoted items.
Sorry, this deal has expired. Get notified of deals like this in the future. Add Deal Alert for this Item
Frontpage

Epson Home Cinema 5050UB 4K PRO-UHD 3-Chip Projector with HDR Expired

$2500
$2,999.99
+ Free Shipping
+31 Deal Score
28,118 Views
Various Retailers have Epson Home Cinema 5050UB 4K PRO-UHD 3-Chip Projector with HDR (V11H930020) on sale from $2499.98. Shipping is free.

Thanks to Community Member majaym for sharing this deal.

Available from:Features:
  • High dynamic range (HDR)
  • 3LCD, three-chip technology
  • 2600-lumen brightness
  • Tree-axis motorized lens
  • ±30° vertical keystone correction which ensures distortion-free images.
  • 4096 x 2160 in 2D and 1920 x 1080 in 3D
  • The 15-element glass projection lens displays a bright, uniform image
  • USB Plug and Play instant setup
  • Horizontal and vertical image correction
  • Instant off/on, sleep mode (A/V mute) and direct power off/on
  • Two HDMI inputs
  • 250W UHE lamp: Delivers up to 5,000 hours of lamp life in Eco mode and up to 3,500 hours of lamp life in High mode for extended use
  • 31dB fan noise
  • Remote control with AA batteries included
Good Deal?

Original Post

Written by
Edited January 30, 2024 at 04:11 PM by
Epson Home Cinema 5050UB 4K PRO-UHD 3-Chip Projector with HDR,White on sale for $2499. Regular price is $2999. One of the best budget projectors around for low latency gaming, and deepest blacks for watching movies.

https://www.amazon.com/Epson-Home...B07P7Y3D6G
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Deal
Score
+31
28,118 Views
$2500
$2,999.99

Price Intelligence

Model: Epson Home Cinema 5050UB 4K PRO-UHD Projector

Deal History 

Sort: Most Recent
Post Date Sold By Sale Price Activity
02/26/24Amazon$2500 frontpage
46
11/21/23Amazon$2,399.98 popular
32
10/08/23Amazon$2,399.98
12
07/30/23Amazon$2,499
1
07/02/23Amazon$2,499.98
1
05/30/23Amazon$2,499.98
2
02/08/23Amazon$2,499.99
9
01/29/23ABT Electronics$2500 frontpage
141
12/07/21Amazon$2,899.99
18
12/11/20Amazon$2,699.98
12
05/28/23Amazon$2500 frontpage
65
Show More

Current Prices

Sort: Lowest to Highest | Last Updated 5/18/2024, 12:22 AM
Sold By Sale Price
Best Buy$2999.98
Amazon$2999.98
Abt Electronics$2999.98
Staples$2999.99
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more. If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available. You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.

Your comment cannot be blank.

Featured Comments

Totally understand that personal choice and preference varies widely, because of the image clarity and black levels offered by a TV. However, I cannot convince myself how someone who has experienced the immersion offered by a projector can ever be willing to go back to a TV, provided the projector was setup properly and with a good surround sound system to go with it. When we talk projectors to compare with TVs, we don't talk 100 inches. It is always about 120 inches or more screen size. Some simple reasons why I choose a projector over a TV.

A 135/150 inch TV is impractical in all ways thinkable. Unless display technology improves to give us a 1-2 mm thick panel, it is not movable once setup. You can't take it outside on a fun day for that back yard party or make it the pillion rider on your motorcycle for that get together at your friend's place.
A 150 inch TV if setup on the wall, adds a lot of load on the wall studs/joists, and even more so when you have subwoofers shaking your room. Setting up such a huge TV properly, without structural damage in the long run can be expensive.
If the TV ever needs repair, you have to invite the technician into the comfort of your theater room, and 2 more people to take it off the wall When TV dies one day, you will have to pay to get it off your wall and out of your home.
A DLP projector from a reputed manufacturer almost always fails from a dying bulb, color wheel, a fan and or thermal sensor-all three can be easily replaced by an average DIYer. Been there, done that, so I know what I am talking about. Good luck troubleshooting your 150 inch TV, as the number of components are much more, movability and disassembly are much harder.
When I feel like going to the theater, I buy the 4K disc off of amazon for $20 (unlimited watch for the whole family), make our own pop corn and sink into our recliners. Think not missing theater visits, when you still have that 98 inch TV. In last 3 years, the only movie I watched at a theater is avatar, way of the water for the IMAX and bigger screen experience, thanks to my DIY home setup.


Andrew Robinson and many other A/V enthusiasts might think otherwise, but once you've used a projector it is only practical to assume that projectors are here to stay.
Even Sony admitted this projector punches way above it's weight and lowered their entry level price for true 4k to below 6k (4.8k street) bc of it after it launched...

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. This is known by everyone in the industry that this is the projector to beat under $5000


Multiple independent shoot outs, nearly every publication documents this.
The price was 3k everywhere couple of days back. Can you name a quality true native 4K projector below $5000? I don't care about gaming performance either, but there a lot of people who do. I like my benq better because of superior color accuracy, but one cannot use it for games.

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2013
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 35 Posts
10 Reputation
rkoskier
02-01-2024 at 08:50 AM.
02-01-2024 at 08:50 AM.
Quote from supermanrob :
Ultimately it comes down to quality OR size.
You can try to get close to one or the other but it's costly.
Calibration often gets overlooked or downplayed, plays a role with all this also.

Every time we consider upgrading our display as we currently are, PJ's always comes up.

I just go view a friend's 5050 to remind us of the difference.

We definitely prefer quality over size!
We would have to go to native 4k to get close, size doesn't overcome quality for us.
I do agree this is probably the best non 4k native PJ to get.
One thing to consider is overall experience quality. I love my 4K OLED, particularly when watching something with ambient light. However, I will run downstairs to watch movies on my 120" 1080P projector (Sony HW40es) every time because of the overall experience. The large size AND ability to put speakers behind an acoustically transparent screen creates a seamless experience. Speech comes from actors mouths and sounds come from the action, not from the side or bottom (other than surround effects), and all front speakers can be the same. Everything is just more realistic. This is a projector benefit that is ignored too often. I just have a $500 elite screen - you don't need to spend $2k+. There are great reasons for sticking with a TV instead of a projector. But if the main reason is just quality of the picture, I think you might be missing the forest through the trees.
3
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2005
L3: Novice
> bubble2 293 Posts
42 Reputation
nocturnalmerkin
02-01-2024 at 09:52 AM.
02-01-2024 at 09:52 AM.
Quote from majaym :
Agree about the load per stud, but a 150 inch tv of current standards, let's say approximately adds 400 lbs shared between all the studs. Now when you have two 12/15 inch subwoofers also shaking a room that is inadequately sound treated (in most DIY home theater scenarios), the forces on the studs, the dry wall cannot be neglected I guess, maybe nail pops to begin with. Enthusiasts these days even add 4 subwoofers.
I think 400lbs is a little off. One of Samsungs 98" sets is only 124lbs. A friend of mine has a Dell 86" touchscreen monitor that he got for free from an office building demolition and it is 245lbs and it was extremely difficult for 3 relatively strong guys to get on the wall. This was in a basement with a low ceiling too, not a huge amount of lifting upwards if you get what I mean. Don't know why it is built so heavily, the metal on the backside looks like it would withstand significant gunfire lol.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2014
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 636 Posts
758 Reputation
Original Poster
Pro
Expert
This user is an Expert in Home & Home Improvement
majaym
02-01-2024 at 09:59 AM.
02-01-2024 at 09:59 AM.
Quote from nocturnalmerkin :
I think 400lbs is a little off. One of Samsungs 98" sets is only 124lbs. A friend of mine has a Dell 86" touchscreen monitor that he got for free from an office building demolition and it is 245lbs and it was extremely difficult for 3 relatively strong guys to get on the wall. This was in a basement with a low ceiling too, not a huge amount of lifting upwards if you get what I mean. Don't know why it is built so heavily, the metal on the backside looks like it would withstand significant gunfire lol.
I used Samsung The Wall 146" UHD as a reference here, It is 400 plus pounds in weight.
https://www.habitech.co.uk/Samsun...Stock-Each
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Nov 2005
L3: Novice
> bubble2 293 Posts
42 Reputation
nocturnalmerkin
02-01-2024 at 10:07 AM.
02-01-2024 at 10:07 AM.
Quote from majaym :
I used Samsung The Wall 146" UHD as a reference here, It is 400 plus pounds in weight.
https://www.habitech.co.uk/Samsun...Stock-Each
Wow that's insane. Would need to use a car jack or cherry picker to lift into place. Very unwieldy shape.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Apr 2007
Who is Master Blaster?
> bubble2 886 Posts
390 Reputation
Dumont69
02-01-2024 at 10:54 AM.
02-01-2024 at 10:54 AM.
Quote from rkoskier :
One thing to consider is overall experience quality. I love my 4K OLED, particularly when watching something with ambient light. However, I will run downstairs to watch movies on my 120" 1080P projector (Sony HW40es) every time because of the overall experience. The large size AND ability to put speakers behind an acoustically transparent screen creates a seamless experience. Speech comes from actors mouths and sounds come from the action, not from the side or bottom (other than surround effects), and all front speakers can be the same. Everything is just more realistic. This is a projector benefit that is ignored too often. I just have a $500 elite screen - you don't need to spend $2k+. There are great reasons for sticking with a TV instead of a projector. But if the main reason is just quality of the picture, I think you might be missing the forest through the trees.

To add to this....


A screen offers a very different viewing experience from a panel. There is no question that panels excel in many areas. The reality is that sometimes they excel too much! Lots of really good cinematography is shot with screens in mind (and obviously historically always has been).


I can watch Star Wars (I love the despecialized version as it's what I saw in the theater when it came out) on my OLED and it looks amazing.....but watching it on the big screen with the attributes that brings is definitely more cinematic, no contest. There are just some movies that need a screen, not just for the size but for the aesthetics. Godfather, Interstellar, Bladerunner, Barry Lyndon, etc.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Sep 2019
L3: Novice
> bubble2 273 Posts
70 Reputation
EyeVandy
02-01-2024 at 12:03 PM.
02-01-2024 at 12:03 PM.
Quote from johnmartmill :
Any ideas about when the 5050UB's successor will come out?
Looks to me like it's already out - the LS11000. It's $1K more, but you get a laser light source instead of a bulb, and a higher refresh rate, and you lose 3D. I think it also has an upgraded pixel shift to actually show all of the 4K pixels, although not natively. Seems to be a brightness decrease also.

I'd personally stick with the 5500 and save a grand, especially if you think you might like 3D. I was skeptical about how much I'd like active glasses 3D on this projector, and for most movies I'd probably choose 4K and height channels over 3D. But a handful are incredible.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by EyeVandy February 1, 2024 at 12:07 PM.
Joined Jul 2010
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 9,111 Posts
1,135 Reputation
Pro
supermanrob
02-01-2024 at 12:27 PM.
02-01-2024 at 12:27 PM.
Quote from rkoskier :
One thing to consider is overall experience quality. I love my 4K OLED, particularly when watching something with ambient light. However, I will run downstairs to watch movies on my 120" 1080P projector (Sony HW40es) every time because of the overall experience. The large size AND ability to put speakers behind an acoustically transparent screen creates a seamless experience. Speech comes from actors mouths and sounds come from the action, not from the side or bottom (other than surround effects), and all front speakers can be the same. Everything is just more realistic. This is a projector benefit that is ignored too often. I just have a $500 elite screen - you don't need to spend $2k+. There are great reasons for sticking with a TV instead of a projector. But if the main reason is just quality of the picture, I think you might be missing the forest through the trees.

I do/did take that into account with the key word being quality.

For me the association with big as quality regarding PQ always reminds me of the association of loud being quality regarding AQ.

Imo Oled + proper audio setup offers the best of both sides & better overall experience.
3
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2013
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 35 Posts
10 Reputation
rkoskier
02-01-2024 at 03:23 PM.
02-01-2024 at 03:23 PM.
Quote from supermanrob :
I do/did take that into account with the key word being quality.

For me the association with big as quality regarding PQ always reminds me of the association of loud being quality regarding AQ.

Imo Oled + proper audio setup offers the best of both sides & better overall experience.
I appreciate your opinion on choosing an OLED instead of a projector. It's not wrong. However, I disagree with the argument that a big screen is like wanting loud sound. A bigger screen is more akin to surround sound. It's more immersive. For movies, I would choose a 5.2.2 surround system with less fidelity than a high fidelity 3.1 system.
2
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Oct 2006
L5: Journeyman
> bubble2 870 Posts
185 Reputation
raiz
02-01-2024 at 03:51 PM.
02-01-2024 at 03:51 PM.
Quote from johnmartmill :
Any ideas about when the 5050UB's successor will come out?
It already did. It's called the LS12000.
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by raiz February 2, 2024 at 09:00 PM.
Joined Dec 2006
L7: Teacher
> bubble2 4,564 Posts
378 Reputation
Ev02625
02-01-2024 at 03:58 PM.
02-01-2024 at 03:58 PM.
spend over 2500 for a bulb projector in 2024.............
1
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2013
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 25 Posts
10 Reputation
dush51
02-01-2024 at 06:19 PM.
02-01-2024 at 06:19 PM.
Quote from raiz :
It already did. It's called the LS11000.

Actually ls12000 is the true successor with ultra black tech similar to 5050ub. Ls11000 native contrast level is lower than 5050ub. It is more of a successor to 4010 IMO.
2
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Jul 2010
L10: Grand Master
> bubble2 9,111 Posts
1,135 Reputation
Pro
supermanrob
02-01-2024 at 07:42 PM.
02-01-2024 at 07:42 PM.
Quote from rkoskier :
I appreciate your opinion on choosing an OLED instead of a projector. It's not wrong. However, I disagree with the argument that a big screen is like wanting loud sound. A bigger screen is more akin to surround sound. It's more immersive. For movies, I would choose a 5.2.2 surround system with less fidelity than a high fidelity 3.1 system.

Well that analogy is inaccurate, immersive and fidelity are not the same thing.
Not to mention neither is comparing a 5.2.2 vs 3.1.

As I pointed out the key word quality.
Even you clearly point to size being akin to "overall experience quality".

Immersive would be 5.2.2 enabled vs 5.2.4 overhead.
Fidelity would be the enabled uses entry level speakers, the overhead full range/reference speakers.
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Last edited by supermanrob February 2, 2024 at 03:32 AM.
Joined Nov 2014
L4: Apprentice
> bubble2 396 Posts
55 Reputation
StreetJedi
02-01-2024 at 09:47 PM.
02-01-2024 at 09:47 PM.
Quote from Abouna :
The JVC is $5k
and the Sony is even more.


So no, not even close unless $2k+ is close to you.
What? My reply was $100% accurate in naming new native 4k projectors under $5000
The Sony XW500ES and JVC NP5 are both going for $4999

Are you just trolling?
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Joined Dec 2005
L6: Expert
> bubble2 1,062 Posts
196 Reputation
DavidinKS
02-02-2024 at 09:46 AM.
02-02-2024 at 09:46 AM.
Quote from EyeVandy :
Looks to me like it's already out - the LS11000. It's $1K more, but you get a laser light source instead of a bulb, and a higher refresh rate, and you lose 3D. I think it also has an upgraded pixel shift to actually show all of the 4K pixels, although not natively. Seems to be a brightness decrease also.

I'd personally stick with the 5500 and save a grand, especially if you think you might like 3D. I was skeptical about how much I'd like active glasses 3D on this projector, and for most movies I'd probably choose 4K and height channels over 3D. But a handful are incredible.
Also, bare in mind that when the laser performance diminishes earlier than they claim or outright fails you basically can just throw the projector in the trash vs what it will cost to fix it. Contrast that with the 5050 which will run like brand new every time you need to replace it's light source...

Laser based pj's are like ev car's - when the hardware fails you just throw 'em away lol
1
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply

Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.

Joined Dec 2013
L2: Beginner
> bubble2 35 Posts
10 Reputation
rkoskier
02-02-2024 at 10:36 AM.
02-02-2024 at 10:36 AM.
Quote from supermanrob :
Well that analogy is inaccurate, immersive and fidelity are not the same thing.
Not to mention neither is comparing a 5.2.2 vs 3.1.

As I pointed out the key word quality.
Even you clearly point to size being akin to "overall experience quality".

Immersive would be 5.2.2 enabled vs 5.2.4 overhead.
Fidelity would be the enabled uses entry level speakers, the overhead full range/reference speakers.
I'm not analogizing immersivity to fidelity - those are different things. I am choosing immersivity as more important than fidelity. You were analogizing big screens to loud sound. I disagree with this analogy, as I think bigger screens are more like adding more speakers in that larger screens and more speakers both tend to provide a more immersive experience. Anyway, it's almost the weekend so time to figure out what I'm gonna watch!
Like
Funny
>
Helpful
Not helpful
Reply
Page 5 of 6
Start the Conversation
 

More Amazon Deals

Link Copied

The link has been copied to the clipboard.