Samsung has for EDU/EPPMembers: 43" Odyssey Neo G7 4K 144Hz 1ms Mini-LED Smart Gaming Monitor (LS43CG702NNXZA) on sale for $350.01 when you follow the deal instructions below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Hunter tDames for sharing this deal.
At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $199.98 lower (36% savings) than the next best comparable online prices starting from $549.99.
This collaborative space allows users to contribute additional information, tips, and insights to enhance the original deal post. Feel free to share your knowledge and help fellow shoppers make informed decisions.
Samsung has for EDU/EPPMembers: 43" Odyssey Neo G7 4K 144Hz 1ms Mini-LED Smart Gaming Monitor (LS43CG702NNXZA) on sale for $350.01 when you follow the deal instructions below. Shipping is free.
Thanks to Deal Hunter tDames for sharing this deal.
At the time of this posting, our research indicates that this is $199.98 lower (36% savings) than the next best comparable online prices starting from $549.99.
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
I bought this once and immediately returned it due to poor viewing angles and the fact that it's really more of a TV than a monitor in terms of turning on and off, handling inputs, etc. I have a 3 ft deep desk, pushed it back until the stand was hanging off the edge, and still had a lot of issues with uniformity. I'd recommend at least a 4 ft viewing distance, which makes this a pretty bad monitor unless you have a very unconventional setup.
Wish this was IPS, VA panel is going to be rough with the viewing angle washout. If your close enough, Looking at the center the edges left and right will be washed out since VA has such a narrow viewing angle.
This 43 inch Neo G7 is a big, bright 4K Mini LED screen that works well as a monitor for desk productivity, casual gaming, and media use. The price looks especially strong if the EPP coupon appears, dropping it closer to the low 300s. It also avoids burn in worries and has a matte screen that cuts reflections, with some setups benefiting from 120Hz instead of 144Hz to reduce ghosting. The main cautions are its VA viewing angles, occasional uniformity and wake up quirks, and the fact that 43 inches at 4K can feel fuzzy or too large at normal desk distance. A strong value if the size and panel tradeoffs fit your setup.
office users who want large-screen real estate and also do casual gaming on the side, because commenters said it's a great price for "large screen real estate for Office productivity" while still being able to game casually.
people using it as a dual-purpose TV/monitor in a kids room, because one commenter said it's "closer to a smart tv than a monitor" and recommended it specifically for that setup.
PC gamers who sit far enough back and want a big, bright, sharp 4K screen at a discounted price, because a commenter said it "works very well as a PC monitor" and that at $350-$400 they "never seen a better option."
buyers who plan to mount it with VESA and are okay using a VESA adapter if needed, because one commenter said it's been working great but "you'll need a VESA adapter" due to wider mounting holes.
people who sit close to the screen for desk work, because commenters warned the VA panel can cause "viewing angle washout" with the edges left/right looking washed out if you're close enough.
buyers who need consistent uniformity and strong viewing angles from a typical desk setup, because one commenter returned it after "poor viewing angles" and "a lot of issues with uniformity," even with a deep desk.
people who want crisp text for normal computer distances, because commenters said 43" at this resolution can feel uncomfortable at typical desk distances and that text is "a tiny bit fuzzy" due to relatively low PPI.
buyers who are sensitive to blooming behavior and compare panel types closely, because one commenter cautioned that "Panel type absolutely matters" and that IPS can have "high blooming compared to VA" even with Mini-LED.
people with a desk that can't accommodate the monitor's physical height, because a commenter said it "might be too tall for my desk" when considering the purchase.
Viewing angles and uniformity can be poor even with a deep desk setup, which can make the display feel more TV-like than monitor-like for inputs and power handling.
The VA panel can wash out the left and right edges when you sit close, and some setups need at least about a 4-foot viewing distance to avoid uniformity and angle problems. On a larger desk, the issue may be less noticeable.
It can work well as a PC monitor, but 43" at 4K has relatively low PPI for close desk use, so text may look a bit fuzzy and the size can feel uncomfortable at normal distances. It is better suited to a deep desk, TV/media use, or a dual TV/monitor setup.
Setting it to 120Hz can reduce ghosting compared with 144Hz, and some users also recommend tuning the picture settings because the stock calibration is poor. That makes 120Hz the smoother choice for motion on this model.
It can sometimes fail to wake properly, but power-cycling it with the remote usually clears it. That makes it usable, though not as seamless as a typical monitor.
This was 250ish a while back and I got it, its definitely good for the price but you'll have to watch a tuning video on YouTube to dial in the settings. The stock tuning is so bad, also for whatever reason setting it to 120hz rather than 144 significantly reduces ghosting. The perfect use case for this is as a dual utility TV/monitor for a kids room that wants to use it for both, as its closer to a smart tv than a monitor.
If this deal was available when I purchased a Best Buy, 48" LG B5 for $550 last month - minus the $30 price match for Black Friday, I would have purchased this Samsung instead! If you surf the EPP site for a few minutes, a $50/10% off one item coupon should pop up making this $350 deal even better at $315! This is a great price for anyone that needs large screen real estate for Office productivity that just so happens to casual game on the side as well. 👍 Great find and price imho!
No, the B5 is far better than this in nearly every metric. Even with the price difference.
Will this do PBP with 2 inputs? Getting conflicting info on my search, early reviews say no but later reviews say maybe, not sure if there was a update to the multiview.
I bought this once and immediately returned it due to poor viewing angles and the fact that it's really more of a TV than a monitor in terms of turning on and off, handling inputs, etc. I have a 3 ft deep desk, pushed it back until the stand was hanging off the edge, and still had a lot of issues with uniformity. I'd recommend at least a 4 ft viewing distance, which makes this a pretty bad monitor unless you have a very unconventional setup.
Direct user experience is certainly better than just saying "VA panel bad!"
I bought this earlier this year for about this price. It's not a bad monitor but IMO 43" in this aspect ratio is not particularly comfortable at normal distances for computer usage and the PPI is on the low side. Text is just a tiny bit fuzzy- not the fault of the monitor per se as much as the resolution at this size. A 27" 1440p is almost the same PPI to give you an idea.
For the price i'm not dissatisfied but I probably would have just stuck with 32" 4ks or 27" 1440s if I knew then what I know now. It would make a decent tv or media consumption monitor.
i have this monitor, replace acer predator 3440x1440. spec wise you cant beat it, i use 9070xt and its perfect. Only issue is sometimes it wont wake up properly but a simple off and on via remote clears it right up.
No, the B5 is far better than this in nearly every metric. Even with the price difference.
Not at all. There are many reasons to choose this monitor over something like the B5 aside from price (which is definitely a good one, considering it is almost half the price when discounted):
1) you won't have to worry about burn-in, especially if you use it with static screens for work
2) since it's a monitor (and not a TV) it plays well with your existing setup without extra software
3) the screen is not glossy, so you don't have to worry about reflections from windows or light sources in your room
4) the refresh rate for gaming is better than the B5
5) the 48" B5 is, in practice, quite a bit larger when it comes to actual desk space - so the effective PPI becomes much worse unless you have a very deep desk and don't mind sitting much further away from your monitor
1
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
I got this one instead.. this one is a SLICKDEAL with fast IPS for $344.96 plus 10% off when you sign up to receive texts from Samsung.. I work for a local hospital in surgery.
Will share after I receive it and setup the office. Have 2 curved widescreens right now and they are not working well for me. So looking to stack these one of over another and get a horizon screen for the slack feed
Not at all. There are many reasons to choose this monitor over something like the B5 aside from price (which is definitely a good one, considering it is almost half the price when discounted):1) you won't have to worry about burn-in, especially if you use it with static screens for work2) since it's a monitor (and not a TV) it plays well with your existing setup without extra software3) the screen is not glossy, so you don't have to worry about reflections from windows or light sources in your room4) the refresh rate for gaming is better than the B55) the 48" B5 is, in practice, quite a bit larger when it comes to actual desk space - so the effective PPI becomes much worse unless you have a very deep desk and don't mind sitting much further away from your monitor
1) Unless you really really abuse it, a B5 will not get burn in
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
1) Unless you really really abuse it, a B5 will not get burn in
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
I've had this monitor for about a year and while it's certainly not nearly as bad as this guy implies, it isn't beating the B5 on anything but price, imo. It's a big, bright, sharp screen for little money and really it shouldn't perform like a model that (as of today) is almost twice the price. It is just a re-badged tv, but it works very well as a PC monitor.
This was panned super-hard when it came out because it doesn't perform like the $1000 launch price implied and a lot of people parrot those initial reviews to this day. But at $350-$400, I've never seen a better option. Though I would welcome any advise on similarly spec'ed models that perform better at this price point.
I do think this performs better at 120hz than 144hz. Seems like they were reaching for a marketing point on that one
Wish this was IPS, VA panel is going to be rough with the viewing angle washout. If your close enough, Looking at the center the edges left and right will be washed out since VA has such a narrow viewing angle.
I've been using a 40" 4K VA monitor for the last 8 years and have zero issues with the viewing angle on a large desk. Just recently ordered this 43" as an upgrade.
Like
Helpful
Funny
Not helpful
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Top Comments
Community Reviews
This 43 inch Neo G7 is a big, bright 4K Mini LED screen that works well as a monitor for desk productivity, casual gaming, and media use. The price looks especially strong if the EPP coupon appears, dropping it closer to the low 300s. It also avoids burn in worries and has a matte screen that cuts reflections, with some setups benefiting from 120Hz instead of 144Hz to reduce ghosting. The main cautions are its VA viewing angles, occasional uniformity and wake up quirks, and the fact that 43 inches at 4K can feel fuzzy or too large at normal desk distance. A strong value if the size and panel tradeoffs fit your setup.
A $50 or 10% off one-item coupon can appear on the EPP site, which can lower the effective price from about $350 to around $315.
The monitor can work well as a PC monitor because it is big, bright, and sharp for the money.
The screen is non-glossy, which can reduce reflections from windows or other light sources in the room.
A VESA adapter can be required because the mounting holes are wider than standard, enabling proper mounting after adding the adapter.
The VA panel can cause viewing-angle washout at the edges when sitting close to the screen.
Viewing angles and uniformity can be poor even with a deep desk setup, which can make the display feel more TV-like than monitor-like for inputs and power handling.
Text can appear a bit fuzzy at normal desk distances because 43 inches at this resolution has relatively low PPI for computer use.
Stock tuning can be poor, and ghosting may improve only after changing settings such as lowering refresh rate from 144Hz to 120Hz.
Common Questions (5)
AI-generated summary based on comments from the community. Updated ago
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!
30 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
For the price i'm not dissatisfied but I probably would have just stuck with 32" 4ks or 27" 1440s if I knew then what I know now. It would make a decent tv or media consumption monitor.
1) you won't have to worry about burn-in, especially if you use it with static screens for work
2) since it's a monitor (and not a TV) it plays well with your existing setup without extra software
3) the screen is not glossy, so you don't have to worry about reflections from windows or light sources in your room
4) the refresh rate for gaming is better than the B5
5) the 48" B5 is, in practice, quite a bit larger when it comes to actual desk space - so the effective PPI becomes much worse unless you have a very deep desk and don't mind sitting much further away from your monitor
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.samsung.com/us/comput...g702en
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
This was panned super-hard when it came out because it doesn't perform like the $1000 launch price implied and a lot of people parrot those initial reviews to this day. But at $350-$400, I've never seen a better option. Though I would welcome any advise on similarly spec'ed models that perform better at this price point.
I do think this performs better at 120hz than 144hz. Seems like they were reaching for a marketing point on that one
debating whether to get this, but it might be too tall for my desk
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Join The Conversation
Share your experience with the Slickdeals community
Share information with the community. Please follow our Community Guidelines and be kind!