expiredtDames | Staff posted Dec 15, 2025 11:24 PM
Item 1 of 4
Item 1 of 4
expiredtDames | Staff posted Dec 15, 2025 11:24 PM
Samsung EDU/EPP: 43" Odyssey Neo G7 4K 144Hz 1ms Mini-LED Gaming Monitor
+ Free Shipping$350
$1,000
65% offSamsung
Visit SamsungGood Deal
Bad Deal
Save
Share
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
30 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
For the price i'm not dissatisfied but I probably would have just stuck with 32" 4ks or 27" 1440s if I knew then what I know now. It would make a decent tv or media consumption monitor.
1) you won't have to worry about burn-in, especially if you use it with static screens for work
2) since it's a monitor (and not a TV) it plays well with your existing setup without extra software
3) the screen is not glossy, so you don't have to worry about reflections from windows or light sources in your room
4) the refresh rate for gaming is better than the B5
5) the 48" B5 is, in practice, quite a bit larger when it comes to actual desk space - so the effective PPI becomes much worse unless you have a very deep desk and don't mind sitting much further away from your monitor
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://www.samsung.com/us/comput...g702en
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
2) The only thingmost people care about that the B5 won't do is wake from sleep, you will need to power it on and off each time
3) B5 screen is not glossy, it is matte
4) 24 fps refresh rate difference will not be noticable to most, and at 4k most modern games won't get that high regardless
5) 43" is already absurdly big for a desk, going to 48 won't be much of a difference with a proper setup
6) This monitor in this OP is almost literal trash, that is why it is so cheap. It is very "smeary" in fast moving situations, not worth it even at this price (imo of course)
This was panned super-hard when it came out because it doesn't perform like the $1000 launch price implied and a lot of people parrot those initial reviews to this day. But at $350-$400, I've never seen a better option. Though I would welcome any advise on similarly spec'ed models that perform better at this price point.
I do think this performs better at 120hz than 144hz. Seems like they were reaching for a marketing point on that one
debating whether to get this, but it might be too tall for my desk
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment