Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Forum Thread
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
Price Intelligence
Give Feedback Model: SAMSUNG 65 Inch Class 8K Ultra HD (4320P) HDR Smart QLED TV UN65Q900 (2019 Model)
Deal History
Deal History includes data from multiple reputable stores, such as Best Buy, Target, and Walmart. The lowest price among stores for a given day is selected as the "Sale Price".
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sale Price does not include sale prices at Amazon unless a deal was posted by a community member.
Sort: Most Recent
| Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
 12/23/20 |  Walmart | $2,393.50 popular |
57 |
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
You can also earn cash back rewards on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases with the Amazon Prime Visa credit card. Read our review to see if it’s the right card for you.
Recommended Deal Alerts For You
What are Deal Alerts?
Want more deals like this?
Create a deal alert for QLED TVs.
Add Deal Alert for QLED TVs
More Tech & Electronics Deals & Discounts
View AllFrontpage
Frontpage
Roku
Select Roku Owners: Roku Devices: Express 4K+ $24, Streaming Stick 4K $30, Ultra $60 + Free Shipping
$60
+ Free Shipping
51
83
Frontpage
$32.60
+ Free Shipping
44
32
Frontpage
from $56
+ Free S/H
57
81
Frontpage
26 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
A human eye can't perceive that much resolution or tell the difference between them, so anything more than 3-4K resolution is just symbolic.
Also, human eye can't see more than certain frame per seconds, so 8K at 120Hz is just not possible. That too the statistics are for a very healthy human eye, which 90% of people don't have.
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
You're right.. Same thing, I am also referring the scientific findings only.
Yes, people can say that there is some smoothness, some clarity and all, but it's not a huge difference, beside that like any other things they claim with respect to normal healthy eyes, so normal healthy eyes are not majority has.
He's trolling, just report and ignore
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
I have 3x 43-inch 4k Samsungs in portrait orientation on my desk. I sit about 30 inches from the center screens. If I used this one 65-inch 8k monitor, it would be like having 4 of my current 4k portrait screens with no bezels. There are people that could use 8k right now at this size. I have an LG Gram coming that is supposed to output 8k.... So I just might try it.