Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Forum Thread
Samsung 65" Q900 QLED 8K 7680x4320 HDR 120Hz-Native Smart TV FS $2297.99
$2,297.99
Good deal?
You gave thanks to MyTimothyKelley for this post.
Thank you!
MyTimothyKelley posted this deal. Say thanks!
Thank you!
MyTimothyKelley posted this deal. Say thanks!
Created 05-12-2021
at 12:54 PM
by MyTimothyKelley
in
QLED TVs
(5)
If you purchase something through a post on our site, Slickdeals may get a small share of the sale.
About the OP
Don't have Amazon Prime? Students can get a free 6-Month Amazon Prime trial with free 2-day shipping, unlimited video streaming & more.
If you're not a student, there's also a free 1-Month Amazon Prime trial available.
Recommended Deal Alerts For You
What are Deal Alerts?
Want more deals like this?
Create a deal alert for QLED TVs.
Add Deal Alert for QLED TVs
26 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
A human eye can't perceive that much resolution or tell the difference between them, so anything more than 3-4K resolution is just symbolic.
Also, human eye can't see more than certain frame per seconds, so 8K at 120Hz is just not possible. That too the statistics are for a very healthy human eye, which 90% of people don't have.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
A human eye can't perceive that much resolution or tell the difference between them, so anything more than 3-4K resolution is just symbolic.
Also, human eye can't see more than certain frame per seconds, so 8K at 120Hz is just not possible. That too the statistics are for a very healthy human eye, which 90% of people don't have.
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861
Yes, people can say that there is some smoothness, some clarity and all, but it's not a huge difference, beside that like any other things they claim with respect to normal healthy eyes, so normal healthy eyes are not majority has.
This has been mostly debunked and is something that will still require much further research in the future. But, some people can detect flicker in images that have high contrast up to 500hz. Many people will point to the ability for the eye to track moving objects as a point for why you can't see more than 60hz. But, we are talking about perceiving a moving image on an image that is constantly refreshing while being backlit. The average person sees a huge difference in smoothness between 60hz and 120hz and likely higher.
Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/srep07861