Amazon has
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Extended Edition & Theatrical Cut Set (4K Ultra HD + Digital) on sale for
$70.97.
Shipping is free.
Note: Shows "in stock soon" but you may place your order now and won't be charged until the item ships.
Walmart also has
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Extended Edition & Theatrical Cut Set (4K Ultra HD + Digital) on sale for
$70.97.
Shipping is free or select free store pickup where available.
Thanks to community member
chbrandt for finding this deal.
About this product:- "This critically acclaimed epic trilogy follows the quest undertaken by the hobbit, Frodo Baggins, and his fellowship of companions to save Middle-earth by destroying the One Ring and defeating the evil forces of the Dark Lord Sauron."
- This 9-Disc Set Includes:
- 4K Ultra HD Discs + Digital Copies for:
- The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
- Theatrical Cut (2 hrs 58 mins) & Extended Edition (3 hrs 32 mins)
- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)
- Theatrical Cut (2 hrs 59 mins) & Extended Edition (3 hrs 55 mins)
- The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)
- Theatrical Cut (3 hrs 21 mins) & Extended Edition (4 hrs 23 mins)
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
102 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank kevinc21ox
Only difference big between the 820 & 420 Is DV.
So if budget is an issue, IMO the 420 is easily the best pick. I easily would give up DV for the other benefits.
I actually did that for our living room 😁
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
To a fan the EE is the best one to watch, since "new" at this watching the TE would make more sense.
The non fan may find the EE drags on to much.I th
To a fan the EE is the best one to watch, since "new" at this watching the TE would make more sense.
The non fan may find the EE drags on to much.
On my 65" (which is about as large a TV as anyone else has that I personally know) 4K itself was no big deal compared to HD. HDR and Atmos were a much bigger upgrade.
I just want to be sure about this before buying another set
I just want to be sure about this before buying another set
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
On my 65" (which is about as large a TV as anyone else has that I personally know) 4K itself was no big deal compared to HD. HDR and Atmos were a much bigger upgrade.
1st off let's clear one thing up, "Atmos" has nothing to do with 4K/8K that's all AQ.
What something was shot in isn't the main factor on the PQ you are watching, it's the transfer of it that counts the most.
It's not uncommon to have a "2K" transfer having a better PQ than a "4K" transfer.
Technically it may be true it's "physically impossible to see a difference" BUT what is perceived is a different story.
Just look at what you perceive, "4K" vs "HD" it's "no big deal"!
HDR CAN be a benefit but only if the transfer is good AND your equipment can take full advantage of it. Most displays can't take full advantage of HDR capabilities also.
There is a PQ difference between a 65" OLED vs TCL, people will debate how much and or the worth of that difference but there is one.
How your player processes the PQ to your display plays a big role here also.
This is done thru tone mapping and since there is no set standard on the best way to do this, everyone has their own process.
As fun as this conversation is it's all comes down to perception!
Just look at streaming, many people think it's "good enough" and/or is "good".
How often do you read someone saying" people still buy disc!"
Same happens with AQ many people see "Atmos" and think it's better.
They buy an OLED and use a "Atmos" soundbar or entry level speakers and that's great!
Leave a Comment