Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Post Date | Sold By | Sale Price | Activity |
---|---|---|---|
01/07/24 | Newegg | $54.99 |
3 |
07/30/23 | Newegg | $33 popular |
9 |
06/07/23 | Newegg | $65.99 popular |
12 |
05/25/23 | Newegg | $32.99 |
1 |
04/26/23 | Newegg | $35 frontpage |
37 |
04/13/23 | Newegg | $40 |
0 |
02/24/23 | Newegg | $44 frontpage |
10 |
01/05/23 | Newegg | $45 |
1 |
12/21/22 | Newegg | $45 frontpage |
20 |
12/15/22 | Newegg | $51 frontpage |
41 |
11/29/22 | Newegg | $47.99 |
1 |
11/15/22 | Newegg | $49.50 frontpage |
13 |
11/09/22 | Newegg | $51.99 |
1 |
09/07/22 | Newegg | $56.99 |
3 |
08/15/22 | Newegg | $59 |
2 |
05/30/22 | Newegg | $65 frontpage |
39 |
03/16/22 | Newegg | $72.99 |
2 |
02/26/22 | Newegg | $67.99 |
0 |
02/05/22 | Newegg | $70.99 popular |
23 |
01/11/22 | Newegg | $74.99 |
3 |
Product Name: | Team Group CX2 2.5" 1TB SATA III 3D NAND Internal Solid State Drive (SSD) T253X6001T0C101 |
Product Description: | Advanced SLC Caching technology. 4 times faster The advanced SLC Caching algorithm technology makes its read/write speed easily 4 times[1] faster than traditional hard drives. A must-have upgrade to keep up with the times Different from traditional mechanical hard drive, the CX2 with innovative and bold design uses FLASH technology with low power consumption and high-speed transfer features. It is the best choice for replacing traditional hard drives. Shock and drop resistant for safe use. Quiet and lightweight CX2 Solid state drives are shock and drop resistant (1500G/0.5ms) and do not make annoying mechanical noises. It can also effectively avoid computer crash due to kicking. Wear-Leveling prolongs the service life greatly The powerful Wear-Leveling technology and ECC (Error Correction Code) function enhance the reliability of data transfer and prolong the service life of the SSD. Specification Interface SATA Rev. 3.0 (6Gb/s) — with backwards compatibility to SATA Rev. 2.0 Capacity 256GB / 512GB / 1TB[2] Voltage DC +5V Operation Temperature 0°C ~ 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C Terabyte Written 256GB / >60TB 512GB / >120TB 1TB / >240TB[3] Performance Crystal Disk Mark: 256GB Read/Write: up to 520/430 MB/s 512GB Read/Write: up to 530/470 MB/s 1TB Read/Write: up to 540/490 MB/s[4] Dimensions 100(L) x 69.9(W) x 7(H) mm Humidity 0°C ~ 55°C / 5% ~ 95% RH, non-condensing Vibration 20G (non-operating) Shock 1,500G MTBF 2,000,000 hours Operating System Windows 10 / 8.1 / 8 / 7 / Vista MAC OS 10.4 or later Linux 2.6.33 or later Warranty 3-year limited warranty [1] The speed was tested by TEAMGROUP and for the reference only. [1] 1GB= 1.000,000.000 Bytes. In OS system, it would be displayed as 1,000,000,000 Bytes/1024/1024/1024= 0.93GB [2] Definition and conditions of TBW (Terabytes Written) are based on JEDEC standard [3] Transmission speed will vary according to different hardware/software conditions, therefore the data can only use for basic reference. * We reserve the right to modify product specifications wit |
Product SKU: | N82E16820331561 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
43 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
The SATA interface is more limited than a direct PCIE interface, like NVME, but it still has a place and is not going anywhere soon.
The underlying NAND flash is not different between a 2.5" SSD or a M.2 2280 form factor, so the cost can not be radically different even though the interface has very large differences. You can save on the controller costs however.
https://docs.google.com/spreadshe...edi
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Our community has rated this post as helpful. If you agree, why not thank MWink
The 2.5" SSD is already outdated so it is expected though a little too late. Who has a modern laptop or PC that uses this form factor instead of the newer M2 2280 or NVMe these days?
If anything, the 2280 SSDs from reliable brands like Samsung and Hynix should be seeing the price drop by now, not this.
EDIT: The truth is too hard for you downvoters to accept? Do a quick Google search. The 2.5" SSD came out in 1991, 31 years ago. The M.2 came out in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.or
https://www.crucial.com/articles/...ie-or-sata
The 2.5" SSD is already outdated so it is expected though a little too late. Who has a modern laptop or PC that uses this form factor instead of the newer M2 2280 or NVMe these days?
If anything, the 2280 SSDs from reliable brands like Samsung and Hynix should be seeing the price drop by now, not this.
EDIT: The truth is too hard for you downvoters to accept? Do a quick Google search. The 2.5" SSD came out in 1991, 31 years ago. The M.2 came out in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.or
https://www.crucial.com/articles/...ie-or-sata [crucial.com]
My 2 year old laptop I am sitting at now has a 2.5 and an m.2..
I have SSDs in both.
The 2.5" SSD is already outdated so it is expected though a little too late. Who has a modern laptop or PC that uses this form factor instead of the newer M2 2280 or NVMe these days?
If anything, the 2280 SSDs from reliable brands like Samsung and Hynix should be seeing the price drop by now, not this.
EDIT: The truth is too hard for you downvoters to accept? Do a quick Google search. The 2.5" SSD came out in 1991, 31 years ago. The M.2 came out in 2012.
https://en.wikipedia.or
https://www.crucial.com/articles/...ie-or-sata
SATA SSDs may be older tech, but that doesn't make them useless. My PC has 2 m.2 slots (1 PCIe gen 4, 1 gen 3), and they're both already filled for a total of 3tb. My build has six 2.5" bays that I added two 1tb SATA SSDs in RAID 0 for extra game storage. Especially since Direct Storage isn't implemented in a single game on PC yet, games on this drive won't load any slower than the fastest drive on the market (at least not noticeably). Even when Direct Storage finally is implemented, I'll have extra storage for games that will load very slightly slower than my NVME drives.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
The vast majority of modern desktops and many laptops still support 2.5" SATA drives. Most of them also support the M.2 form factor, which can also be SATA. Even on machines with M.2 slots, SATA ports tend to be more plentiful. They are a great way to add more storage. Also, even though the NVMe interface can allow for much higher throughput, for the most common uses, there will be little to no noticeable performance difference.
Have you actually looked at the latest desktop motherboards? ALL of the ones I've seen have way more SATA connectors than M.2 connections. The fact of the matter is there are only so many PCIE lanes available. I don't think any consumer motherboards offer 4 m.2 slots that work at full speed. That's why people move up to Threadripper Pro.
I agree that I wish pricing was better on these drives but to call them "outdated" is just crazy. They all serve their purpose. SATA speed SSDs will be around for a long time. Most consumer applications are perfectly fine on SATA SSDs.
Off the cuff guess would be you'd be more likely to find them on larger form factors, less likely on smaller form factors / ultra-thins. No question though, SATA ports definitely won't be as ubiquitous on laptops as they are on desktop motherboards; just tremendously more specialized / varied / space constrained. You'd think at least a RAM slot would be a given, but not the case...
The SATA interface is more limited than a direct PCIE interface, like NVME, but it still has a place and is not going anywhere soon.
The underlying NAND flash is not different between a 2.5" SSD or a M.2 2280 form factor, so the cost can not be radically different even though the interface has very large differences. You can save on the controller costs however.
Coming from a semiconductor engineer, SATA SSDs can be manufactured on older, far cheaper process nodes than a space constrained NVMe drive. This was super evident with 120GB SATA SSDs as they would literally take up the entire PCB on both sides, whereas 120GB SATA M.2 30mm drives would be on the newest process.