_______________________________________________________________________________________
This post can be edited by most users to provide up-to-date information about developments of this thread based on user responses, and user findings. Feel free to add, change or remove information shown here as it becomes available. This includes new coupons, rebates, ideas, thread summary, and similar items.
Once a Thread Wiki is added to a thread, "Create Wiki" button will disappear. If you would like to learn more about Thread Wiki feature, click here.
Leave a Comment
Top Comments
631 Comments
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Oled vs LED is a different tech way different looks. One brighter other better contrast.
Looking and watching a TV needs experts?? This is not 90s. Everyone has multiple TVs from different brands & tech based TVs in home.
Reviewers always a have bias of "not getting a TV from a brand" if Truth is spoken. + Many reviewers have a bias for some brands.
Anyone can revisit old comments in many forums about Pro-Samsung groups about the tirade against OLED. Now they started the same pattern of DV abuse.
If HDR is so great, why they have HDR10 and some???
Looking and watching a TV needs experts?? This is not 90s. Everyone has multiple TVs from different brands & tech based TVs in home.
Reviewers always a have bias of "not getting a TV from a brand" if Truth is spoken. + Many reviewers have a bias for some brands.
Anyone can revisit old comments in many forums about Pro-Samsung groups about the tirade against OLED. Now they started the same pattern of DV abuse.
If HDR is so great, why they have HDR10 and some???
Dolby vision as a format is superior however it is just a format, the tv processing has to do a lot of work to make it look good. The content creators have to do a LOT of work to grade the hdr properly. They often don't. For example when the mandalorian came out they graded the intro text to be the brightest point of the content and this made everything extra dim.
The point is when I say experts I mean people who review TVs for a living talking hdtvtest or stop the fomo level. They buy all the QLED and oleds and test them with objective measurements:
They do side by side comparison sometimes with the same tv. Hdr10 vs Dolby vision side by side same settings and you can observe the difference is not big sometimes Dolby vision looks too dark it's not a reason to skip on an amazing tv.
Your last comment makes me think that you might not understand what HDR10 and Dolby vision really are and how they relate to HDR. Maybe I'm wrong the point stands this is not a reason to skip on this tv put this next to 99 percent of the Dolby vision TVs and most will prefer this tv due to the qdoled colors infinite contrast and brightness.
Also only Samsung was shutting on oled before and the reason was they did not have the panels and neeed to compete market wise NO tv expert would say qled was better. Only in certain situations where your room is very bright with direct sunlight you preferred a qled. Initially oleds were too dim. MLA and QDOLED changed that tho
Attachment 14953837
Attachment 14953840
My company's rewards/bonus program allows you to use points to buy gift cards at various retailers, BB being one of them. Got $600 in gift cards so this puppy only cost me $1,200 plus tax. Not bad for an upgrade from 60" to 77". It's technically too large for my viewing distance, but it also prevented me from buying an 83" or larger TV.
If you are going thru perksatwork, there should also be 9x points, and that should be able to stack with other portals, plus Samsung rewards.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
We waited for the Proper Mounting Kit and Screws to arrive (pay attention to screw length if your going to mount) and used the legs/stands... now now want to wall mount it but the size of the tv coupled with how thin it is leaves us nervous to apply any pressure...
Thanks in advance!
Dolby vision as a format is superior however it is just a format, the tv processing has to do a lot of work to make it look good. The content creators have to do a LOT of work to grade the hdr properly. They often don't. For example when the mandalorian came out they graded the intro text to be the brightest point of the content and this made everything extra dim.
The point is when I say experts I mean people who review TVs for a living talking hdtvtest or stop the fomo level. They buy all the QLED and oleds and test them with objective measurements:
They do side by side comparison sometimes with the same tv. Hdr10 vs Dolby vision side by side same settings and you can observe the difference is not big sometimes Dolby vision looks too dark it's not a reason to skip on an amazing tv.
Your last comment makes me think that you might not understand what HDR10 and Dolby vision really are and how they relate to HDR. Maybe I'm wrong the point stands this is not a reason to skip on this tv put this next to 99 percent of the Dolby vision TVs and most will prefer this tv due to the qdoled colors infinite contrast and brightness.
Also only Samsung was shutting on oled before and the reason was they did not have the panels and neeed to compete market wise NO tv expert would say qled was better. Only in certain situations where your room is very bright with direct sunlight you preferred a qled. Initially oleds were too dim. MLA and QDOLED changed that tho
can & will like your post. It is always the principle, until me doing, it is not good.what I see is More reasons for excuses. I can argue on your points. It's enough.
can & will like your post. It is always the principle, until me doing, it is not good.what I see is More reasons for excuses. I can argue on your points. It's enough.
Just a format. The content grading is much more important
You buy a tv to enjoy the image and trust me if u or anyone gets this tv dials it in and watches a movie they'll be too impressed they won't give a crap about Dolby vision.
Not to say the Dolby vision capable TVs are worse is just that it isn't a big dealll
Answering your other question
They did charged me tax on the final price. The screenshots are just showing the sub-total.
Maybe before you try again try clearing your cookies or using incognito. The only reason we get these slickdeals on Samsung.com is due to the big mess there website is, specially the backend coding they have. Because of the convoluted mess their website is these stacking codes deals are very YMMV.
Good luck, hope you get the deal.
To the slickdeals mods, I apologize about the cashback website talk.
Not sure... which I'll use, the 30 or 35 but the set includes:
M8 x 16mm & M8 x 20mm & M8 x 25mm & M8 x 30mm & M8 x 35mm & M8 x 40mm
Brand was Echogear
Not sure... which I'll use, the 30 or 35 but the set includes:
M8 x 16mm & M8 x 20mm & M8 x 25mm & M8 x 30mm & M8 x 35mm & M8 x 40mm
Brand was Echogear
The G3 is LG's flagship thus the higher price. Is meant to compete with the Sony A95L and Samsung S95C. If price wasn't a factor in my opinion Sony A95L is better than the LG G3, and in last place is the S95C.
The S90C and S89C are cheaper versions of the S95C with the main difference being the wireless input box that no one really cares about, a little brighter image, and a slight better color calibration out of the box, and maybe better audio. However reviews have shown that image quality between the S90C and S89C is negligible. I saw them side by side and I really can't tell the difference. So the S90C has become the better buy.
The G3 price in the other hand is way higher because of the reputation LG has built in the past few years in the OLED TV market, making the demand for it high in that market. Not to mention that LG has to pay Dolby fees for the Dolby Vision and Sound features included. Samsung doesn't includes Dolby with their TV so they can lower the price. The OS Tizen, although is a piece of crap costs less to use for Samsung's TV division mainly because it is used in way more devices than LG's WebOS. Samsung is the number 1TV maker in the market and has had better manufacturing yields than LG. LG is known that has had some problems utilizing their plants at 100% thus increases the costs.
In summary G3 costs more because it is a higher tier TV for LG, with better image processor, Dolby, better reputation, and a brightness good enough thanks to MLA. The S90C is cheaper because it doesn't have Dolby, is Samsung's mid tier TV, Sammy has lower reputation to LG in the OLED market, and I think mainly because Samsung decided that their strategy in the OLED market was to compete in the more affordable tiers.
If you have the money to burn go with the G3 or the Sony A95L for sure. I wish I had that kind of money, would have gotten a Sony long time ago. But for less than $2k this Samsung TV is the undefeated best value.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
Leave a Comment