Did this coupon
work for you?
work for you?
Product Name: | PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6750 XT 12GB GDDR6 PCI Express 4.0 ATX Video Card AXRX 6750XT 12GBD6-3DH |
Product Description: | Learn more about the PowerColor AXRX 6750XT 12GBD6-3DH Model Brand PowerColor Series Fighter Model AXRX 6750XT 12GBD6-3DH Interface Interface PCI Express 4.0 Chipset Chipset Manufacturer AMD GPU Series AMD Radeon RX 6000 Series GPU Radeon RX 6750 XT Architecture RDNA 2 Game Clock 2495 MHz Boost Clock 2600 MHz Stream Processors 2560 Stream Processors Memory Effective Memory Clock 18.0 Gbps Memory Size 12GB Memory Interface 192-Bit Memory Type GDDR6 3D API DirectX DirectX 12 Ultimate OpenGL OpenGL 4.6 Ports HDMI 1 x HDMI 2.1 DisplayPort 3 x DisplayPort 1.4 Details Cooler Double Fans Thermal Design Power 250W Recommended PSU Wattage 650W Power Connector 1 x 6-Pin + 1 x 8-Pin Form Factor & Dimensions Form Factor ATX Max GPU Length 243 mm Slot Width 2.2 Slots Additional Information Date First Available December 26, 2023 |
Product SKU: | N82E16814131860 |
The link has been copied to the clipboard.
22 Comments
Your comment cannot be blank.
Featured Comments
FWIW, Tom's Hardware GPU Hierarchy 2024, which is based on a range of 8 games, lists the 1080 at 34.4% the speed of a 4090, with the 6750xt at 66.8% (102.9 fps vs 53.0 fps at 1080p Ultra) (77.2 fps vs 39.4 fps at 1440p Ultra).
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
GPU comparisons are significantly more complex than some percentage difference, especially comparing Nvidia to AMD.
Also, if you aren't comparing raster against raster, it's not a fair comparison anyways.
If you guys want this card, buy it by all means… but don't act like it is some world-beating 4K gaming card. It's not
https://www.techpowerup
GPU comparisons are significantly more complex than some percentage difference, especially comparing Nvidia to AMD.
Also, if you aren't comparing raster against raster, it's not a fair comparison anyways.
If you guys want this card, buy it by all means… but don't act like it is some world-beating 4K gaming card. It's not
https://youtu.be/hmMWNrRHiNY?si=-EaJn3ODFm6pN6Em
This chart has the 6700xt not 6750xt in it. So add 3-5 frames to make up the overclock and extra power draw the 6750xt pulls.
The nice thing about stuff like this is that the raw data is easy to find…now it's even easier!
(Also I originally downvoted your post, and after further reflection, I have rescinded that. The 1080ti is a great card, and IF you already have one, moving to the 6750xt wouldn't be my first choice (6800xt /7800xt would be mine for amd or 3080/4070 for Intel as a 1080p/1440p true successor)
My guess is this will be as fast as the 8600 xt coming out towards the end of the year give or take 5%. If you need a card now, go for it, but if you can wait 4-5 months maybe see what the next gpu line offers. Both will be around the same price probably.
GPU comparisons are significantly more complex than some percentage difference, especially comparing Nvidia to AMD.
Also, if you aren't comparing raster against raster, it's not a fair comparison anyways.
If you guys want this card, buy it by all means… but don't act like it is some world-beating 4K gaming card. It's not
The 1080ti is a legendary card, but holy hell its old. It can about trade blows with a $250 7600 which is pretty amazing, but a 6750xt is vastly superior, as it should be.
GPU comparisons are significantly more complex than some percentage difference, especially comparing Nvidia to AMD.
Also, if you aren't comparing raster against raster, it's not a fair comparison anyways.
If you guys want this card, buy it by all means… but don't act like it is some world-beating 4K gaming card. It's not
Dude. Nobody even implied that this is some amazing 4K GPU. Don't know where you are getting that from.
And referring to that Hardware Unboxed video, I agree the GTX 1080ti is the goat. It was an amazing card at release it is still a solid 1080p gaming card today. But the 12 game comparison at 1080p has the GTX 1080ti at 64 FPS average, while the RX 6700 XT (slightly slower than the 6750) averaged 91 FPS. That makes the Radeon over 42% faster than the GTX 1080ti. That is still a great showing for the old GeForce card, but nowhere near the same performance ballpark. It's not even close.
That 42% difference is about the same as the difference between a RX 6700 XT and an RTX 3080. And nobody would put those two cards in the same performance category.
This chart has the 6700xt not 6750xt in it. So add 3-5 frames to make up the overclock and extra power draw the 6750xt pulls.
The nice thing about stuff like this is that the raw data is easy to find…now it's even easier!
(Also I originally downvoted your post, and after further reflection, I have rescinded that. The 1080ti is a great card, and IF you already have one, moving to the 6750xt wouldn't be my first choice (6800xt /7800xt would be mine for amd or 3080/4070 for Intel as a 1080p/1440p true successor)
Thanks for owning the change. Everyone else on here seems to just be against the idea that older cards can still hold their own in a lot of ways. Reminds me a bit like this:
https://youtube.com/shorts/5-3i86...f1W_4Waq
Also, the point of reference I made was rainbow 6 at 4K for the most apples-to-apples comparison. Still, margin for error needs to be accounted for.
Sign up for a Slickdeals account to remove this ad.
https://youtube.com/shorts/5-3i86...f1W_4Waq
Also, the point of reference I made was rainbow 6 at 4K for the most apples-to-apples comparison. Still, margin for error needs to be accounted for.
The 6750 XT 12 GB is the best performing card for $250-$300 imo.